Cited by 426Cultural Competency in Health CareRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs

Open access
Vela, Monica B., Erondu, Amarachi I., Smith, Nichole A., Peek, Monica E., Woodruff, James N., Chin, Marshall H.·2022·Annual Review of Public Health

Abstract

Health care providers hold negative explicit and implicit biases against marginalized groups of people such as racial and ethnic minoritized populations. These biases permeate the health care system and affect patients via patient–clinician communication, clinical decision making, and institutionalized practices. Addressing bias remains a fundamental professional responsibility of those accountable for the health and wellness of our populations. Current interventions include instruction on the existence and harmful role of bias in perpetuating health disparities, as well as skills training for the management of bias. These interventions can raise awareness of provider bias and engage health care providers in establishing egalitarian goals for care delivery, but these changes are not sustained, and the interventions have not demonstrated change in behavior in the clinical or learning environment. Unfortunately, the efficacy of these interventions may be hampered by health care providers’ work and learning environments, which are rife with discriminatory practices that sustain the very biases US health care professions are seeking to diminish. We offer a conceptual model demonstrating that provider-level implicit bias interventions should be accompanied by interventions that systemically change structures inside and outside the health care system if the country is to succeed in influencing biases and reducing health inequities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of the systematic review.
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of the systematic review.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Interactions between structural determinants and provider implicit bias. The vicious cycle: Structural determinants of implicit bias in the practice environment support biased decision making. Structural determinants of health in the community further impair outcomes in marginalized populations, leading to confirmation of the practitioner’s implicit bias. Health disparities are exacerbated. The virtuous cycle: A favorable practice environment regarding structural determinants of implicit bias supports unbiased clinical decision making. Favorable structural determinants of health in the community further enhance patient outcomes, positively reinforcing unbiased practice. Health disparities are reduced.
Figure 2 Interactions between structural determinants and provider implicit bias. The vicious cycle: Structural determinants of implicit bias in the practice environment support biased decision making. Structural determinants of health in the community further impair outcomes in marginalized populations, leading to confirmation of the practitioner’s implicit bias. Health disparities are exacerbated. The virtuous cycle: A favorable practice environment regarding structural determinants of implicit bias supports unbiased clinical decision making. Favorable structural determinants of health in the community further enhance patient outcomes, positively reinforcing unbiased practice. Health disparities are reduced.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Figure 2. Percentage of applicants to U.S. medical schools by race/ethnicity (alone), academic year 2018–2019
  2. Blanchard J, 2004, J. Fam. Pract., 53, 721
  3. Hinton PR., 1993, The Perception of People
  4. Lee M, 2021, Can. Med. Educ. J., 12, e7
  5. National Academy of Sciences (US) NtAoEU, and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, 2007, Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering
  6. Osta K, Implicit bias and structural racialization
  7. Poustchi Y, 2013, Fam. Med., 45, 345
  8. Staats C, 2015, State of the science: implicit bias review 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 426

Metadata

Authors
Vela, M. B., Erondu, A. I., Smith, N. A., Peek, M. E., Woodruff, J. N., & Chin, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Public Health
Published
2022-04-05
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
477-501
ISSN
  • 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2093
OpenAlex
W4206528627
Cited by
426
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 176 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 9
FWCI
14.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092949)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
implicit bias, explicit bias, healthcare workers, racial and ethnic minorities, health disparities, bias interventions, patient-clinician communication, clinical decision-making, organizational discrimination, structural change, conceptual model
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Health Personnel, Humans, Bias, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review