The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: Psychology as a Science of Design
Abstract
▪ Abstract Human-computer interaction (HCI) study is the region of intersection between psychology and the social sciences, on the one hand, and computer science and technology, on the other. HCI researchers analyze and design specific user interface technologies (e.g. pointing devices). They study and improve the processes of technology development (e.g. task analysis, design rationale). They develop and evaluate new applications of technology (e.g. word processors, digital libraries). Throughout the past two decades, HCI has progressively integrated its scientific concerns with the engineering goal of improving the usability of computer systems and applications, which has resulted in a body of technical knowledge and methodology. HCI continues to provide a challenging test domain for applying and developing psychological and social theory in the context of technology development and use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
The critical incident technique.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0061470 · Cited by 8,191
Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments
Brunswik, E. (1956) · doi:10.1525/9780520350519 · Cited by 2,974
The Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages
Shneiderman (1983) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.1983.1654471 · Cited by 1,939
Interface Metaphors and User Interface Design
Carroll, J. M., Mack, R. L., & Kellogg, W. A. (1988) · Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-70536-5.50008-7 · Cited by 345
Self-citationBlocking Learner Error States in a Training-Wheels System
Carroll, J. M., & Carrithers, C. (1984) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088402600402 · Cited by 132
Self-citationIdentifying potential CSCW applications by means of activity theory concepts: a case example
Kuutti, K., & Arvonen, T. (1992) · Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '92 · doi:10.1145/143457.150955 · Cited by 120
Cited by
Hong, S., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009 · Cited by 955
Baker, R. S. J. D., D'Mello, S. K., Rodrigo, M. M. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.12.003 · Cited by 936
Blackwell, S. E., & Holmes, E. A. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1680 · Cited by 196
Optimizing Students’ Mental Health and Academic Performance: AI-Enhanced Life Crafting
Dekker, I., De Jong, E. M., Schippers, M. C., De Bruijn-Smolders, M., Alexiou, A., & Giesbers, B. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01063 · Cited by 176
Lyon, A. R., Brewer, S. K., & Areán, P. A. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000652 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Carroll, J. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-83
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2163509922
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
