Cited by 1,050Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Can We Increase Translation of Research into Practice? Types of Evidence Needed

Glasgow, Russell E., Emmons, Karen M.·2007·Annual Review of Public Health

Abstract

This review summarizes key factors that have interfered with translation of research to practice and what public health researchers can do to hasten such transfer, focusing on characteristics of interventions, target settings, and research designs. The need to address context and to utilize research, review, and reporting practices that address external validity issues—such as designs that focus on replication, and practical clinical and behavioral trials—are emphasized. Although there has been increased emphasis on social-ecological interventions that go beyond the individual level, interventions often address each component as if it were an independent intervention. Greater attention is needed to connectedness across program levels and components. Finally, examples are provided of evaluation models and current programs that can help accelerate translation of research to practice and policy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 107 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Best A, 2003, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev, 12, 705
  2. 10.1001/jama.274.9.700 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Fiore MC, 2000, Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians
  4. Glasgow RE, 2006, Am. J. Manag. Care, 12, 137
  5. Glynn TM, 1989, How to Help your Patients Stop Smoking: A Manual for Physicians
  6. Green LW, Ottosen JM. 2004. From efficacy to effectiveness to community and back: evidence-based practice vs practice-based evidence. Proc. Clin. Trials Community: Sci. Transl. Diabetes Obes. Res. Natl. Inst. Diabetes Dig. Kidney Dis ., Jan. 12–14, NIH Publ. 04-5540, Bethesda, Maryland
  7. Inst. Med. 2006. Progress in preventing childhood obesity: focus on industry—brief summary: Institute of Medicine Regional Symposium . http://www.iom.edu/CMS/3788/25044/34007.aspx
  8. Kingdon J, 1995, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy
  9. Oldenberg B, 2002, Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice, 312
  10. Shadish WR, 2002, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Generalized Causal Inference
  11. Wagner EH, 1998, Eff. Clin. Pract, 1, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Glasgow, R. E., & Emmons, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Public Health
Published
2007-04-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
413-433
ISSN
  • 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2093
OpenAlex
W2112604521
Cited by
1,050
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 66
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK035524, R01 DK 35524-05)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (3U48 DP 00064-01S1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
research-to-practice translation, evidence-based practice, public health interventions, generalizability, context, replication study, evaluation model, evidence-based policy, research design
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Organizational, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, Policy Making, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Public Health Practice, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review