Cited by 85Muscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and DisordersClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Exogenous amino acids stimulate human muscle anabolism without interfering with the response to mixed meal ingestion

Paddon-Jones, Douglas, Sheffield-Moore, Melinda, Aarsland, Asle, Wolfe, Robert R., Ferrando, Arny A.·2005·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

We sought to determine whether ingestion of a between-meal supplement containing 30 g of carbohydrate and 15 g of essential amino acids (CAA) altered the metabolic response to a nutritionally mixed meal in healthy, recreationally active male volunteers. A control group (CON; n = 6, 38 ± 8 yr, 86 ± 10 kg, 179 ± 3 cm) received a liquid mixed meal [protein, 23.4 ± 1.0 g (essential amino acids, 14.7 ± 0.7 g); carbohydrate, 126.6 ± 4.0 g; fat, 30.3 ± 2.8 g] every 5 h (0830, 1330, 1830). The experimental group (SUP; n = 7, 36 ± 10 yr, 87 ± 12 kg, 180 ± 3 cm) consumed the same meals but, in addition, were given CAA supplements (1100, 1600, 2100). Net phenylalanine balance (NB) and fractional synthetic rate (FSR) were calculated during a 16-h primed constant infusion of l-[ ring-2 H 5]phenylalanine. Ingestion of a combination of CAA supplements and meals resulted in a greater mixed muscle FSR than ingestion of the meals alone (SUP, 0.099 ± 0.008; CON, 0.076 ± 0.005%/h; P < 0.05). Both groups experienced an improvement in NB after the morning (SUP, −2.2 ± 3.3; CON, −1.5 ± 3.5 nmol·min−1·100 ml leg volume−1) and evening meals (SUP, −9.7 ± 4.3; CON, −6.7 ± 4.1 nmol·min−1·100 ml leg volume−1). NB after CAA ingestion was significantly greater than after the meals, with values of 40.2 ± 8.5 nmol·min−1·100 ml leg volume−1. These data indicate that CAA supplementation produces a greater anabolic effect than ingestion of intact protein but does not interfere with the normal metabolic response to a meal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.00291.2004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paddon-Jones, D., Sheffield-Moore, M., Aarsland, A., Wolfe, R. R., & Ferrando, A. A.
Affiliations
Shriners Hospitals for Children (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2005-04
Volume
288
Issue
4
Pages
E761-E767
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2101500226
Cited by
85
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG024832)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-00073, M01RR000073)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
essential amino acids, muscle protein synthesis, muscle anabolism, fractional synthesis rate, protein supplementation, amino acid metabolism, skeletal muscle
MeSH terms
Adult, Amino Acids, Essential, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Proteins, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review