Cited by 234Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

How consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research

Open access
Wright, Stephen P., Hall Brown, Tyish S., Collier, Scott R., Sandberg, Kathryn·2017·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

A sedentary lifestyle and lack of physical activity are well-established risk factors for chronic disease and adverse health outcomes. Thus, there is enormous interest in measuring physical activity in biomedical research. Many consumer physical activity monitors, including Basis Health Tracker, BodyMedia Fit, DirectLife, Fitbit Flex, Fitbit One, Fitbit Zip, Garmin Vivofit, Jawbone UP, MisFit Shine, Nike FuelBand, Polar Loop, Withings Pulse O 2 , and others have accuracies similar to that of research-grade physical activity monitors for measuring steps. This review focuses on the unprecedented opportunities that consumer physical activity monitors offer for human physiology and pathophysiology research because of their ability to measure activity continuously under real-life conditions and because they are already widely used by consumers. We examine current and potential uses of consumer physical activity monitors as a measuring or monitoring device, or as an intervention in strategies to change behavior and predict health outcomes. The accuracy, reliability, reproducibility, and validity of consumer physical activity monitors are reviewed, as are limitations and challenges associated with using these devices in research. Other topics covered include how smartphone apps and platforms, such as the Apple ResearchKit, can be used in conjunction with consumer physical activity monitors for research. Lastly, the future of consumer physical activity monitors and related technology is considered: pattern recognition, integration of sleep monitors, and other biosensors in combination with new forms of information processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.00349.2016

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a positive trend in wearable studies, underlining growing interest in wearables in health research.

    “Overall, we have identified a positive trend in wearable studies, underlining the growing interest in wearables in health research, in line with other reviews [3,224-226].”
  • These vital signs and device types seem to become the standard in wearable research.

    “These vital signs and device types seem to become the standard in wearable research [3,27,31,224,225].”
  • Open access to wearables' raw data or source codes is another aspect, as companies might change the source code and implement algorithms without obligation to announce or detail changes that might lead to bias and inconsistency of data.

    “Another aspect is open access to the wearables’ raw data or source codes, as companies might change the source code and implement algorithms without the obligation to announce or detail changes that might lead to bias and inconsistency of data [224].”
  • Most medical fields represented in the included studies showed similarities with other reviews, for example, studies often focusing on cardiology, sports medicine, and neurology.

    “Most medical fields represented in the included studies showed similarities with other reviews [224], for example, studies often focusing on cardiology, sports medicine, and neurology.”
  • Similar to other reviews, most devices were wrist-worn fitness trackers and accelerometers, and most were from Fitbit, measuring PA, HR, and sleep.

    “Similar to other reviews, most devices were wrist-worn fitness trackers and accelerometers, and most of them are from the company Fitbit, measuring PA, HR, and sleep [3,27,31,224,225].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1a.Actigraph Corporation Quick Start Guide ActiGraph GT9X Link + ActiLife. Pensacola, FL: Actigraph, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. [39]Ledger D, McCaffrey D. Inside Wearables: How the Science of Human Behavior Change Offers the Secret to Long-Term Engagement. Cambridge, MA: Endeavour Partners; https://endeavourpartners.net/white-papers/, 2014, p. 1–17. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, S. P., Hall Brown, T. S., Collier, S. R., & Sandberg, K.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, D.C.; and
  • Appalachian State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, Stephen P.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2017-03-01
Volume
312
Issue
3
Pages
R358-R367
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2570277196
Cited by
234
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 5
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) (TL1-TR001431, UL1-TR001409)
  • HHS | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHBLI) (R01-HL119380)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
wearable activity trackers, step count accuracy, pathophysiology, sedentary lifestyle, behaviour change interventions, health outcome prediction, mobile application, biosensors, pattern recognition, chronic disease risk
MeSH terms
Fitness Trackers, Equipment Design, Humans, Physiology, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Exercise, Telemedicine, Equipment Failure Analysis, Biomedical Research, Actigraphy, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review