Cited by 149Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings

BAI, YANG, WELK, GREGORY J., NAM, YOON HO, LEE, JOEY A., LEE, JUNG-MIN, KIM, YOUNGWON, MEIER, NATHAN F., DIXON, PHILIP M.·2016·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the relative validity of different consumer and research activity monitors during semistructured periods of sedentary activity, aerobic exercise, and resistance exercise. METHODS: Fifty-two (28 male and 24 female) participants age 18-65 yr performed 20 min of self-selected sedentary activity, 25 min of aerobic exercise, and 25 min of resistance exercise, with 5 min of rest between each activity. Each participant wore five wrist-worn consumer monitors [Fitbit Flex, Jawbone Up24, Misfit Shine (MS), Nike+ Fuelband SE (NFS), and Polar Loop] and two research monitors [ActiGraph GT3X+ on the waist and BodyMedia Core (BMC) on the arm] while being concurrently monitored with Oxycon Mobile (OM), a portable metabolic measuring system. Energy expenditure (EE) on different activity sessions was measured by OM and estimated by all monitors. RESULTS: Mean absolute percent error (MAPE) values for the full 80-min protocol ranged from 15.3% (BMC) to 30.4% (MS). EE estimates from ActiGraph GT3X+ were found to be equivalent to those from OM (± 10% equivalence zone, 285.1-348.5). Correlations between OM and the various monitors were generally high (ranged between 0.71 and 0.90). Three monitors had MAPE values lower than 20% for sedentary activity: BMC (15.7%), MS (18.2%), and NFS (20.0%). Two monitors had MAPE values lower than 20% for aerobic exercise: BMC (17.2%) and NFS (18.5%). None of the monitors had MAPE values lower than 25% for resistance exercise. CONCLUSION: Overall, the research monitors and Fitbit Flex, Jawbone Up24, and NFS provided reasonably accurate total EE estimates at the individual level. However, larger error was evident for individual activities, especially resistance exercise. Further research is needed to examine these monitors across various activities and intensities as well as under real-world conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000000727

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BAI, Y., WELK, G. J., NAM, Y. H., LEE, J. A., LEE, J.-M., KIM, Y., MEIER, N. F., & DIXON, P. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2016-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
151-158
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346316985
Cited by
149
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 1
FWCI
17.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/3)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
wearable activity trackers, energy expenditure estimation, wrist-worn devices, sedentary activity, aerobic exercise, resistance training, measurement validity, Fitbit, jaw bone, misfit, ActiGraph GT3X+
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise, Resistance Training, Young Adult, Sedentary Behavior, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review