Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 934

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interstitial-lymphatic mechanisms in the control of extracellular fluid volume

Aukland, K., Reed, R. K.·1993·Physiological Reviews
DOI 10.1152/physrev.1993.73.1.1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

While the study of the physiochemical composition and structure of the interstitium on a molecular level is a large and important field in itself, the present review centered mainly on the functional consequences for the control of extracellular fluid volume. As pointed out in section I, a biological monitoring system for the total extracellular volume seems very unlikely because a major part of that volume is made up of multiple, separate, and functionally heterogeneous interstitial compartments. Even less likely is a selective volume control of each of these compartments by the nervous system. Instead, as shown by many studies cited in this review, a local autoregulation of interstitial volume is provided by automatic adjustment of the transcapillary Starling forces and lymph flow. Local vascular control of capillary pressure and surface area, of special importance in orthostasis, has been discussed in several recent reviews and was mentioned only briefly in this article. The gel-like consistency of the interstitium is attributed to glycosaminoglycans, in soft connective tissues mainly hyaluronan. However, the concept of a gel phase and a free fluid phase now seems to be replaced by the quantitatively more well-defined distribution spaces for glycosaminoglycans and plasma protein, apparently in osmotic equilibrium with each other. The protein-excluded space, determined mainly by the content of glycosaminoglycans and collagen, has been measured in vivo in many tissues, and the effect of exclusion on the oncotic buffering has been clarified. The effect of protein charge on its excluded volume and on interstitial hydraulic conductivity has been studied only in lungs and is only partly clarified. Of unknown functional importance is also the recent finding of a free interstitial hyaluronan pool with relatively rapid removal by lymph. The postulated preferential channels from capillaries to lymphatics have received little direct support. Thus the variation of plasma-to-lymph passage times for proteins may probably be ascribed to heterogeneity with respect to path length, linear velocity, and distribution volumes. Techniques for measuring interstitial fluid pressure have been refined and reevaluated, approaching some concensus on slightly negative control pressures in soft connective tissues (0 to -4 mmHg), zero, or slightly positive pressure in other tissues. Interstitial pressure-volume curves have been recorded in several tissues, and progress has been made in clarifying the dependency of interstitial compliance on glycosaminoglycan-osmotic pressure, collagen, and microfibrils.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physrev.1993.73.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Aukland, K., & Reed, R. K.
Venue
Physiological Reviews
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
1993-01-01
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
1-78
ISSN
  • 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1210
DOI
10.1152/physrev.1993.73.1.1
OpenAlex
W2181049752
Cited by
934
References
0
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.