The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods
Abstract
Does the period over which individuals evaluate outcomes influence their investment in risky assets? Results from this study show that the more frequently returns are evaluated, the more risk averse investors will be. The results are in line with the behavioral hypothesis of “myopic loss aversion,” which assumes that people are myopic in evaluating outcomes over time, and are more sensitive to losses than to gains. The results have relevance for the equity premium puzzle, and also for the marketing strategies of fund managers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Laboratory studies have since demonstrated that humans can show loss aversion for objects such as mugs (22), money (23), and simulated investments (24, 25).”
From Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion (2009) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(85)90061-3 · Cited by 5,764
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (2013) · World Scientific handbook in financial economic series · doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0016 · Cited by 5,379
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118511 · Cited by 2,487
Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking.
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17 · Cited by 2,043
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Samuelson Paul, 1963, Scientia, 108
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 998
Safarzyńska, K. (2017) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-017-0193-9 · Cited by 31
Too Proud to Stop: Regret in Dynamic Decisions
Strack, P., & Viefers, P. (2019) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvz073 · Cited by 30
Preferences predict who commits crime among young men
Epper, T., Fehr, E., Hvidberg, K. B., Kreiner, C. T., Leth‐Petersen, S., & Rasmussen, G. N. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2112645119 · Cited by 31
The Effect of Pre-commitment and Past-Experience on Insurance Choices: An Experimental Study
Papon, T. (2008) · The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review · doi:10.1057/grir.2008.8 · Cited by 30
Experimental Game Theory and Behavior Genetics
Cesarini, D. A., Dawes, C. T., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04505.x · Cited by 29
Myopic risk-taking in tournaments
Eriksen, K. W., & Kvaløy, O. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.10.004 · Cited by 30
The Origin of the Winner's Curse: A Laboratory StudyPreprint
Charness, G. B., & Levin, D. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.932250 · Cited by 29
Ode to the sea: Workplace Organizations and Norms of Cooperation
Uri Gneezy, B., Leibbrandt, A., & List, J. A. (2014) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20234 · Cited by 29
Testing the Waters: Behavior across Participant Pools
Snowberg, E., & Yariv, L. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24781 · Cited by 28
Théroude, V., & Zylbersztejn, A. (2019) · Journal of Public Economic Theory · doi:10.1111/jpet.12366 · Cited by 28
Alan, Ş., & Mumcu, I. (2024) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20230084 · Cited by 28
Investment Behaviour, Risk Sharing and Social Distance
D’Exelle, B., & Verschoor, A. (2015) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12264 · Cited by 28
van Leeuwen, B., Offerman, T., & Schram, A. J. H. C. (2015) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvz001 · Cited by 28
Steimanis, I., Mayer, M., & Vollan, B. (2021) · Climate Risk Management · doi:10.1016/j.crm.2021.100377 · Cited by 29
Demaree, H. A., Burns, K. J., DeDonno, M. A., Agarwala, E. K., & Everhart, D. E. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0025780 · Cited by 27
When mixed options are preferred in multiple-trial decisions
Chen, Y., & Corter, J. E. (2006) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.512 · Cited by 27
Risk preferences, risk perceptions, and risky food
Petrolia, D. R. (2016) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.006 · Cited by 27
Does Presenting Investment Results Asset by Asset Lower Risk Taking?
Anagol, S., & Gamble, K. J. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2013.849253 · Cited by 26
Do the Wealthy Risk More Money? An Experimental Comparison
Bosch‐Domènech, A., & Silvestre, J. (2006) · Studies in economic theory · doi:10.1007/3-540-28161-4_6 · Cited by 26
Risk, Rationality, and Time Diversification
Olsen, R. A., & Khaki, M. (1998) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v54.n5.2212 · Cited by 27
Female leaders and their response to the social environment
Gangadharan, L., Jain, T., Maitra, P., & Vecci, J. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.06.001 · Cited by 26
Klege, R. A., Visser, M., A, M. F. B., & Clarke, R. P. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101662 · Cited by 26
Revealed Preferences over Risk and Uncertainty
Polisson, M., Quah, J. K.-H., & Renou, L. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180210 · Cited by 26
Economic Preferences and Personality Traits Among Finance Professionals and the General Population
Holmén, M., Holzmeister, F., Kirchler, M., Stefan, M., & Wengström, E. (2023) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uead038 · Cited by 26
Anti-social motives explain increased risk aversion for others in decisions from experience
Olschewski, S., Dietsch, M., & Ludvig, E. A. (2019) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002916 · Cited by 26
Responsibility and limited liability in decision making for others – An experimental consideration
Füllbrunn, S., & Luhan, W. J. (2019) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.06.009 · Cited by 26
Cerulli-Harms, A., Goette, L. F., & Sprenger, C. D. (2019) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20170271 · Cited by 26
Neurofinance: Bridging Psychology, Neurology, and Investor BehaviorPreprint
Sapra, S. G., & Zak, P. J. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1323051 · Cited by 28
Can gender differences in distributional preferences explain gender gaps in competition?
Dasgupta, U., Mani, S., Sharma, S., & Singhal, S. (2018) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2018.10.013 · Cited by 25
Portfolio diversification: the influence of herding, status-quo bias, and the gambler’s fallacy
Filiz, I., Nahmer, T., Spiwoks, M., & Bizer, K. (2018) · Financial markets and portfolio management · doi:10.1007/s11408-018-0311-x · Cited by 28
Risk aversion and certification: Evidence from the Nepali tea fields
Mohan, S. A. (2020) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104903 · Cited by 25
Absolute and relative rewards for individuals in team production
Dickinson, D. L., & Isaac, R. M. (1998) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1468(199806/08)19:4/5 · Cited by 38
Does Binding of Feedback Influence Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental AnalysisPreprint
Weber, M., & Langer, T. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 25
Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand
de Quidt, J., Haushofer, J., & Roth, C. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23470 · Cited by 25
Effects of Peers and Rank on Cognition, Preferences, and Personality
Dasgupta, U., Mani, S., Sharma, S., & Singhal, S. (2020) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00966 · Cited by 24
Does Risk Aversion Vary with Decision-Frame? An Empirical Test Using Recent Game Show Data
Mulino, D., Scheelings, R., Brooks, R., & Faff, R. W. (2009) · Review of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1108/19405979200900003 · Cited by 24
Feedback spillovers across tasks, self-confidence and competitiveness
Banerjee, R., Gupta, N. D., & Villeval, M. C. (2020) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2020.07.002 · Cited by 26
On the Trend Recognition and Forecasting Ability of Professional TradersPreprint
Glaser, M., Weber, M., & Langer, T. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.993415 · Cited by 24
Risk attitudes, development, and growth: Macroeconomic evidence from experiments in 30 countriesPreprint
Vieider, F. M., Chmura, T., & Martinsson, P. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 24
When expectations become aspirations: reference-dependent preferences and liquidity constraints
Kramer, B. (2016) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s00199-015-0949-9 · Cited by 25
Behavioral Risk Profiling: Measuring Loss Aversion of Individual Investors
van Dolder, D., & Vandenbroucke, J. (2022) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107293 · Cited by 42
Delay discounting, genetic sensitivity, and leukocyte telomere length
Yim, O. S., Zhang, X., Shalev, I., Monakhov, M. V., Zhong, S., Hsu, M., Chew, S. H., Lai, P. S., & Ebstein, R. P. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1514351113 · Cited by 24
Self-protection against repeated low probability risks
Shafran, A. P. (2011) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-011-9116-2 · Cited by 23
Does the framing of investment portfolios influence risk-taking behavior? Some experimental results
Steul, M. (2006) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2005.12.002 · Cited by 20
Searching for preference stability in a state dependent world
Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., Maitra, P., & Mani, S. (2017) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.001 · Cited by 23
Measuring individual risk preferences
Eckel, C. C. (2019) · IZA World of Labor · doi:10.15185/izawol.454 · Cited by 23
Ertaç, S., Gümren, M., & Gürdal, M. Y. (2019) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.102200 · Cited by 23
Adoption of Environment-Friendly Agricultural Practices with Background Risk: Experimental Evidence
Lefebvre, M., Midler, E., & Bontems, P. (2020) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-020-00431-2 · Cited by 23
The 'Bomb' Risk Elicitation TaskPreprint
Crosetto, P., & Filippin, A. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2100356 · Cited by 24
Time Discounting and Wealth InequalityPreprint
Epper, T., Fehr, E., Fehr-Duda, H., Kreiner, C. T., Lassen, D. D., Leth‐Petersen, S., & Rasmussen, G. N. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3465413 · Cited by 23
Evaluation periods and asset prices: Myopic loss aversion at the financial marketplace
Kliger, D., & Levit, B. (2009) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.03.020 · Cited by 21
Goal Bracketing and Self-Control
Hsiaw, A. (2016) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.06.005 · Cited by 26
Common fate motivates cooperation: The influence of risks on contributions to public goods
Zhang, H. (2018) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2018.10.012 · Cited by 26
Blake, D. P., Wright, D., & Zhang, Y. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1964686 · Cited by 22
Designing and Conducting Laboratory Experiments
Katok, E. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119138341.ch1 · Cited by 23
The modulating effects of brain stimulation on emotion regulation and decision-making
Choi, K. M., Scott, D. T., & Lim, S.-L. (2016) · Neuropsychiatric Electrophysiology · doi:10.1186/s40810-016-0018-z · Cited by 25
Are risk preferences explaining gender differences in investment behavior?
Holden, S. T., & Tilahun, M. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101949 · Cited by 23
An Experimental Examination of Portfolio Choice
Ackert, L. F., Church, B. K., & Qi, L. (2015) · European Finance Review · doi:10.1093/rof/rfv036 · Cited by 21
Competitive Preferences and Ethnicity: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh
Siddique, A., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2019) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uez063 · Cited by 19
Bönte, W., Procher, V., Urbig, D., & Voracek, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00238 · Cited by 21
Webb, E. C., & Shu, S. B. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006252 · Cited by 21
International Evidence on the Equity Premium Puzzle and Time Discounting
Rieger, M. O., Hens, T., & Wang, M. (2013) · Multinational Finance Journal · doi:10.17578/17-3/4-2 · Cited by 21
Measuring Risk Aversion in a Name-Your-Own-Price Channel
Abbas, A. E., & Hann, I.-H. (2010) · Decision Analysis · doi:10.1287/deca.1100.0173 · Cited by 19
Decision Rights: Freedom, Power, and InterferencePreprint
Neri, C., & Rommeswinkel, H. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2485107 · Cited by 21
By chance or by choice? Biased attribution of others’ outcomes when social preferences matter
Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Koh, B. H. (2021) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-021-09731-w · Cited by 20
Angerer, S. V., Bolvashenkova, J., Glätzle‐Rützler, D., Lergetporer, P., & Sutter, M. (2023) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104837 · Cited by 20
The long-term effects of genocide on antisocial preferences
Gangadharan, L., Islam, A., Ouch, C., & Wang, L. C. (2022) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106068 · Cited by 21
Competition, information, and the erosion of morals
Bénistant, J., Galeotti, F., & Villeval, M. C. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.008 · Cited by 20
When winter is over, its cold remains: Early-life famine experience breeds risk aversion
Chen, X., Hu, X., & Xu, J. (2023) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106289 · Cited by 20
Are decisions under risk malleable?
Fong, C. M., & McCabe, K. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.19.10927 · Cited by 20
How Negative Interest Rates Affect the Risk-Taking of Individual Investors: Experimental Evidence
Baars, M., Cordes, H., & Mohrschladt, H. (2018) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.035 · Cited by 21
Female and male role models and competitiveness
Schier, U. K. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.001 · Cited by 20
Focal random selection closes the gender gap in competitiveness
Berger, J. L., Osterloh, M., & Rost, K. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb2142 · Cited by 21
Appreciating Stockbroking: Constructing Conceptions to Make Sense of Performance
Blomberg, J. (2003) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00425.x · Cited by 20
'Old' Money Matters: The Sensitivity of Mutual Fund Redemption Decisions to Past PerformancePreprint
Ivkovich, Z., & Weisbenner, S. J. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.903792 · Cited by 20
Willinger, M., Bchir, M. A., & Heitz, C. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 20
Ellis, A. W., & Freeman, D. J. (2024) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20210877 · Cited by 33
Social Identity, Behavior, and Personality: Evidence from India
Dasgupta, U., Mani, S., Sharma, S., & Singhal, S. (2022) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2022.2139607 · Cited by 24
The role of affective biasing in commercializing new ideas
Adomdza, G. K., & Baron, R. A. (2013) · Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/08276331.2013.771864 · Cited by 19
He, P., Veronesi, M., & Engel, S. (2016) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2017.1336542 · Cited by 26
Room composition effects on risk taking by gender
Castillo, M. E., Leo, G., & Petrie, R. (2019) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-019-09635-w · Cited by 18
The Effect of an Interruption on Risk Decisions
Kupor, D. M., Liu, W. J., & Amir, O. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx092 · Cited by 19
Dunford, B. B., Oler, D. K., & Boudreau, J. W. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00128.x · Cited by 19
Informal Risk-Sharing in an Infinite-Horizon ExperimentPreprint
Charness, G. B., & Garance Genicot, A. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.510862 · Cited by 19
Participation in Competitive Sports Closes Gender Gaps in Competition and in Risk Taking
Willinger, M., Dubois, D., & Bravaccini, S. (2022) · Journal of Sports Economics · doi:10.1177/15270025221108189 · Cited by 18
Dopamine and risk choices in different domains: Findings among serious tournament bridge players
Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Wernerfelt, N., Garcia, J. R., Vilar, M. G., Lum, J. K., & Zeckhauser, R. (2011) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-011-9119-z · Cited by 18
Creativity and Financial Incentives
Charness, G. B., & Grieco, D. (2014) · Cited by 18
Is the Preference for Certainty Always So Certain?
Duke, K. E., Goldsmith, K., & Amir, O. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/695776 · Cited by 21
Fetene, G. M., Kaplan, S., Sebald, A., & Prato, C. G. (2016) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.020 · Cited by 18
Time Preferences and Their Life Outcome Correlates: Evidence from a Representative Survey
Horn, D., & Kiss, H. J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236486 · Cited by 18
The gender leadership gap: insights from experiments
Eckel, C. C., Gangadharan, L., Grossman, P. J., & Xue, N. (2021) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781789909852.00014 · Cited by 19
Eliciting risk preferences that predict risky health behavior: A comparison of two approaches
Yang, M., Roope, L. S. J., Buchanan, J. P., Attema, A. E., Clarke, P., Walker, A. S., & Wordsworth, S. (2022) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4486 · Cited by 18
Broad bracketing for low probability events
Chaudhry, S. J., Hand, M., & Kunreuther, H. C. (2020) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-020-09343-4 · Cited by 19
Continuous Gender Identity and Economics
Brenøe, A., Heursen, L., Ranehill, E., & Weber, R. A. (2022) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.20221083 · Cited by 18
Group member characteristics and risk taking by consensus
Nieboer, J. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2015.05.001 · Cited by 17
Loss Aversion and Learning to Bid
Dittrich, D. A. V., Güth, W., Kocher, M. G., & Pezanis‐Christou, P. (2011) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2011.00892.x · Cited by 18
Narrow Framing and Long-Term Care InsurancePreprint
Gottlieb, D., & Mitchell, O. S. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2652264 · Cited by 18
Chapman, J., Snowberg, E., Wang, S., & Camerer, C. F. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4978692 · Cited by 16
Time in Office and the Changing Gender Gap in Dishonesty: Evidence from Local Politics in India
Chaudhuri, A., Iversen, V., Jensenius, F. R., & Maitra, P. (2020) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12733 · Cited by 17
The effects of income mobility and tax persistence on income redistribution and inequality
Agranov, M., & Palfrey, T. R. (2020) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103372 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Gneezy, U., & Potters, J.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- ORCID
- Potters, J.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 631-645
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W1565295770
- Cited by
- 1,288
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Keywords
- risk-taking, evaluation period, myopic loss aversion, loss aversion, risky asset investment, behavioral finance, equity premium puzzle, investor risk aversion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review