The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods
Abstract
Does the period over which individuals evaluate outcomes influence their investment in risky assets? Results from this study show that the more frequently returns are evaluated, the more risk averse investors will be. The results are in line with the behavioral hypothesis of “myopic loss aversion,” which assumes that people are myopic in evaluating outcomes over time, and are more sensitive to losses than to gains. The results have relevance for the equity premium puzzle, and also for the marketing strategies of fund managers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Laboratory studies have since demonstrated that humans can show loss aversion for objects such as mugs (22), money (23), and simulated investments (24, 25).”
From Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion (2009) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(85)90061-3 · Cited by 5,764
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (2013) · World Scientific handbook in financial economic series · doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0016 · Cited by 5,379
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118511 · Cited by 2,487
Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking.
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17 · Cited by 2,043
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Samuelson Paul, 1963, Scientia, 108
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 998
How Performance Incentives Shape Individual Exploration and Exploitation: Evidence from Microdata
Lee, S., & Meyer‐Doyle, P. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1104 · Cited by 122
Preferences for One-Shot Resolution of Uncertainty and Allais-Type Behavior
Dillenberger, D. (2010) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta8219 · Cited by 110
Myopic loss aversion: Information feedback vs. investment flexibility
Bellemare, C., Krause, M., Kröger, S., & Zhang, C. (2005) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2004.12.011 · Cited by 120
Sutter, M. (2007) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.02.031 · Cited by 108
Narrow Framing and Long‐Term Care Insurance
Gottlieb, D., & Mitchell, O. S. (2019) · Journal of Risk & Insurance · doi:10.1111/jori.12290 · Cited by 119
On the Size of the Gender Difference in Competitiveness
Saccardo, S., Pietrasz, A., & Uri Gneezy, B. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2673 · Cited by 112
Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study
Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Kammoun, H. (2011) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-011-9282-3 · Cited by 119
Three Risk-elicitation Methods in the Field: Evidence from Rural Senegal
Charness, G. B., & Viceisza, A. (2016) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1561/105.00000046 · Cited by 109
Corruption, investments and contributions to public goods: Experimental evidence from rural Liberia
Beekman, G., Bulte, E., & Nillesen, E. (2014) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.004 · Cited by 116
Losses, gains, and brains: Neuroeconomics can help to answer open questions about loss aversion
Rick, S. I. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.04.004 · Cited by 113
Eriksen, K. W., & Kvaløy, O. (2009) · European Finance Review · doi:10.1093/rof/rfp019 · Cited by 112
Does commitment or feedback influence myopic loss aversion?
Langer, T., & Weber, M. (2007) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.019 · Cited by 104
Uri Gneezy, B., & Imas, A. (2016) · Handbook of economic field experiments · doi:10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.08.003 · Cited by 106
Gender Differences in Willingness to Compete: The Role of Culture and Institutions
Booth, A., Fan, E. T., Meng, X., & Zhang, D. (2018) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12583 · Cited by 106
Bracha, A., Uri Gneezy, B., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2015) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/678494 · Cited by 105
Transmission of risk preferences from mothers to daughters
Alan, Ş., Baydar, N., Boneva, T., Crossley, T. F., & Ertaç, S. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.014 · Cited by 102
A News-Utility Theory for Inattention and Delegation in Portfolio Choice
Pagel, M. (2018) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta14417 · Cited by 99
Risk tolerance in the present and the future: an experimental study
NOUSSAIR, C. N., & Wu, P. C. (2006) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.1278 · Cited by 97
Social Influences on Risk Attitudes: Applications in Economics
Trautmann, S. T., & Vieider, F. M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_22 · Cited by 93
Ode to the Sea: Workplace Organizations and Norms of Cooperation
Uri Gneezy, B., Leibbrandt, A., & List, J. A. (2014) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12209 · Cited by 97
Charness, G., & Grieco, D. (2018) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvx055 · Cited by 89
Informal Risk Sharing in an Infinite‐Horizon Experiment
Charness, G. B., & Garance Genicot, A. (2009) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02248.x · Cited by 91
U-shaped relation between plasma oxytocin levels and behavior in the trust game
Zhong, S., Monakhov, M., Mok, H. P., Tong, T., Lai, P. S., Chew, S. H., & Ebstein, R. P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051095 · Cited by 90
Reference-Dependent Preferences
O’Donoghue, T., & Sprenger, C. D. (2018) · Handbook of behavioral economics · doi:10.1016/bs.hesbe.2018.07.003 · Cited by 95
Mindsets Affect Risk Perception and Risk-Taking Behavior
Keller, L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2017) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000304 · Cited by 89
Risk taking by agents: The role of ex-ante and ex-post accountability
Pollmann, M. M. H., Potters, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2014) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2014.04.004 · Cited by 87
Self-citationUsing Field Experiments in Accounting and Finance
Floyd, E., & List, J. A. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12113 · Cited by 96
Financial education and digital asset management: What's in the black box?
Litterscheidt, R., & Streich, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2020.101573 · Cited by 90
Blake, D. P., Wright, D., & Zhang, Y. (2012) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2012.08.001 · Cited by 84
Andries, M., & Haddad, V. (2019) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/705668 · Cited by 86
Worries of the poor: The impact of financial burden on the risk attitudes of micro-entrepreneurs
Dalton, P. S., Nhung, N., & Rüschenpöhler, J. (2020) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.102198 · Cited by 84
Integrating Behavioral Theories in Agent-Based Models for Agricultural Drought Risk Assessments
Schrieks, T., Botzen, W. J. W., Wens, M., Haer, T., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Water · doi:10.3389/frwa.2021.686329 · Cited by 94
Portfolio Choice and Risk Attitudes: An ExperimentPreprint
Charness, G. B., & Uri Gneezy, B. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.397300 · Cited by 82
Attention Triggers and Investors' Risk-Taking
Arnold, M., Pelster, M., & Subrahmanyam, M. G. (2020) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.031 · Cited by 79
Cognitive ability and risk aversion: A systematic review and meta analysis
Lilleholt, L. (2019) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004307 · Cited by 82
Insurance demand and social comparison: An experimental analysis
Friedl, A., de Miranda, K. L., & Schmidt, U. (2014) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-014-9189-9 · Cited by 78
Myopic risk-seeking: The impact of narrow decision bracketing on lottery play
Haisley, E., Mostafa, R., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2008) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-008-9041-1 · Cited by 76
Myopic prospect theory vs. myopic loss aversion: how general is the phenomenon?
Langer, T., & Weber, M. (2004) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2003.01.005 · Cited by 75
Does Aggregated Returns Disclosure Increase Portfolio Risk Taking?
Beshears, J. L., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2016) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhw086 · Cited by 77
On the Trend Recognition and Forecasting Ability of Professional Traders
Glaser, M., Langer, T., & Weber, M. (2007) · Decision Analysis · doi:10.1287/deca.1070.0099 · Cited by 75
Monetary and non-monetary incentives in real-effort tournaments
Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Koh, B. H. (2017) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.10.021 · Cited by 74
Measuring Information Preferences
Ho, E., Hagmann, D., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3543 · Cited by 73
Rank matters–The impact of social competition on portfolio choice
Dijk, O., Holmen, M., & Kirchler, M. (2014) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.11.010 · Cited by 73
Myopic Loss Aversion, Personality, and Gender
Durand, R. B. B., Fung, L., & Limkriangkrai, M. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2018.1511562 · Cited by 76
Limited farsightedness in network formation
Kirchsteiger, G., Mantovani, M., Mauleón, A., & Vannetelbosch, V. J. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.016 · Cited by 72
Measuring preferences for competition with experimentally-validated survey questions
Fallucchi, F., Nosenzo, D., & Reuben, E. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.028 · Cited by 71
China's Sex Ratio and Crime: Behavioral Change or Financial Necessity?
Cameron, L., Meng, X., & Zhang, D. (2019) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12561 · Cited by 58
Which Is Better: Simultaneous or Sequential Choice?
Read, D., Antonides, G., van den Ouden, L., & Trienekens, H. W. J. M. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2917 · Cited by 71
The Bull of Wall Street: Experimental Analysis of Testosterone and Asset Trading
Nadler, A., Jiao, P., Johnson, C. J., Alexander, V., & Zak, P. J. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2836 · Cited by 65
Selection, tournaments, and dishonesty
Faravelli, M., Friesen, L., & Gangadharan, L. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.019 · Cited by 70
Chapman, J., Snowberg, E., Wang, S., & Camerer, C. F. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.3386/w25072 · Cited by 62
Information gaps for risk and ambiguity.
Golman, R., Gurney, N., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000252 · Cited by 68
Androgens and competitiveness in men.
Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., Gray, P. B., Hoffman, M., Little, A. C., & Campbell, B. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/a0021979 · Cited by 69
Risk-taking in social settings: Group and peer effects
Bougheas, S., Nieboer, J., & Sefton, M. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.06.010 · Cited by 65
Foregone with the Wind: Indirect Payoff Information and its Implications for Choice
Brit Grosskopf, A., Erev, I., & Yechiam, E. (2006) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/s00182-006-0015-8 · Cited by 68
RISK TAKING FOR ONESELF AND OTHERS: A STRUCTURAL MODEL APPROACH
Vieider, F. M., Villegas‐Palacio, C., Martinsson, P., & Mejía, M. (2015) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12290 · Cited by 68
Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in InvestmentPreprint
Charness, G. B., & Uri Gneezy, B. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.648735 · Cited by 68
Assessment and Estimation of Risk Preferences
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2014) · Handbook of risk and uncertainty · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53685-3.00004-0 · Cited by 69
Looney, C. A., & Hardin, A. M. (2009) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1052 · Cited by 60
When do we observe a gender gap in competition entry? A meta-analysis of the experimental literature
Markowsky, E., & Beblo, M. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.03.030 · Cited by 63
Tolerance for Failure and Incentives for Collaborative Innovation
Hutchison‐Krupat, J., & Chao, R. O. (2013) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12092 · Cited by 66
Read, D., Loewenstein, G. F., Rabin, M., Keren, G. B., & Laibson, D. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_7 · Cited by 68
Lying and age: An experimental study
Glätzle‐Rützler, D., & Lergetporer, P. (2014) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2014.11.002 · Cited by 62
CREATING A LAB IN THE FIELD: ECONOMICS EXPERIMENTS FOR POLICYMAKING
Viceisza, A. (2015) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12118 · Cited by 62
Do Professional Norms in the Banking Industry Favor Risk-taking?
Cohn, A., Fehr, E., & Maréchal, M. A. (2017) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhx003 · Cited by 62
Comprehension and Risk Elicitation in the Field: Evidence from Rural SenegalPreprint
Charness, G. B., & Viceisza, A. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 62
The Missing Link: Unifying Risk Taking and Time DiscountingPreprint
Epper, T., & Fehr-Duda, H. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2175461 · Cited by 62
The Heat of the Moment: Modeling Interactions Between Affect and Deliberation
Loewenstein, G. F., & O’Donoghue, T. (2007) · Cited by 61
Behavioral finance: insights from experiments II: biases, moods and emotions
Duxbury, D. (2015) · Review of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1108/rbf-09-2015-0037 · Cited by 68
History-dependent risk attitude
Dillenberger, D., & Rozen, K. (2015) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2015.01.020 · Cited by 57
Community-Driven Development and Social Capital: Evidence from Morocco
Nguyen, T. C., & Rieger, M. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.013 · Cited by 61
Beaud, M., & Willinger, M. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1868 · Cited by 60
The Loss Aversion / Narrow Framing Approach to the Equity Premium Puzzle
Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2006) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w12378 · Cited by 63
Closing a Mental Account: The Realization Effect for Gains and Losses
Merkle, C., Müller-Dethard, J., & Weber, M. (2018) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-020-09663-x · Cited by 60
Kocher, M. G., Cherry, T. L., Kroll, S., Netzer, R. J., & Sutter, M. (2007) · Cited by 59
Sampson, R. C., & Shi, Y. L. Z. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3158 · Cited by 63
Social Reference Points and Risk Taking
Schwerter, F. (2023) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.4698 · Cited by 57
Complexity in risk elicitation may affect the conclusions: A demonstration using gender differences
Charness, G. B., Eckel, C. C., Uri Gneezy, B., & Kajackaite, A. (2018) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-018-9274-6 · Cited by 56
Overconfidence and gender gaps in redistributive preferences: Cross-Country experimental evidence
Buser, T., Grimalda, G. F., Putterman, L. G., & van der Weele, J. J. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.005 · Cited by 58
On the Generality of Age Differences in Social and Nonsocial Decision Making
Rieger, M., & Mata, R. (2013) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbt088 · Cited by 58
Are Risk Premium Anomalies Caused by Ambiguity?
Olsen, R. A., & Troughton, G. H. (2000) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v56.n2.2341 · Cited by 54
Dopamine and Risk Choices in Different Domains: Findings Among Serious Tournament Bridge PlayersPreprint
Zeckhauser, R., Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Wernerfelt, N., Garcia, J. R., & Lum, J. K. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 57
To pay or not to pay: Measuring risk preferences in lab and field
Brañas‐Garza, P., Mohedano, L. E., Jorrat, D., Orozco, V., & Ramirez, E. G. R. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008433 · Cited by 56
A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk AttitudesPreprint
Filippin, A., & Crosetto, P. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2402139 · Cited by 54
Phan, T. C., Rieger, M. O., & Wang, M. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2018.04.001 · Cited by 59
Beck, A., Kerschbamer, R., Qiu, J., & Sutter, M. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.09.008 · Cited by 55
Lab and life: Does risky choice behaviour observed in experiments reflect that in the real world?
Verschoor, A., D’Exelle, B., & Pérez-Viana, B. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.009 · Cited by 55
Revealed Preferences over Risk and Uncertainty
Renou, L. (2019) · Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) · Cited by 54
Myopic loss aversion and stock investments: An empirical study of private investors
Lee, B., & Veld‐Merkoulova, Y. V. (2016) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.04.008 · Cited by 58
Hunter-gatherer males are more risk-seeking than females, even in late childhood
Apicella, C. L., Crittenden, A. N., & Tobolsky, V. A. (2017) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.003 · Cited by 54
Gender differences in willingness to compete: The role of public observability
Buser, T., Ranehill, E., & van Veldhuizen, R. (2021) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102366 · Cited by 51
The spillover effects of affirmative action on competitiveness and unethical behavior
Banerjee, R., Gupta, N. D., & Villeval, M. C. (2017) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.10.022 · Cited by 52
The 'Ostrich Effect': Selective Attention to Information About InvestmentsPreprint
Karlsson, N., Seppi, D. J., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.772125 · Cited by 51
The Loss Aversion/Narrow Framing Approach to the Equity Premium PuzzlePreprint
Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.912776 · Cited by 52
Think twice before running! Bank runs and cognitive abilities
Kiss, H. J., Rodríguez-Lara, I., & Rosa-García, A. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2015.01.006 · Cited by 53
Mitigating the Gender Gap in the Willingness to Compete: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment
Alan, Ş., & Ertaç, S. (2018) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvy036 · Cited by 49
The Uncertainty Effect: When a Risky Prospect Is Valued Less Than Its Worst Possible Outcome
Uri Gneezy, B., List, J. A., & Wu, G. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.121.4.1283 · Cited by 52
Öncüler, A., & Croson, R. T. A. (2005) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/0951629805056895 · Cited by 52
Prosociality Predicts Health Behaviors during the COVID-19 PandemicPreprint
Campos‐Mercade, P., Meier, A. N., Schneider, F., & Wengström, E. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3604094 · Cited by 50
What Is Really Behavioral in Behavioral Health Policy? And Does It Work?
Galizzi, M. M. (2014) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppt036 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Gneezy, U., & Potters, J.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- ORCID
- Potters, J.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 631-645
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W1565295770
- Cited by
- 1,288
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Keywords
- risk-taking, evaluation period, myopic loss aversion, loss aversion, risky asset investment, behavioral finance, equity premium puzzle, investor risk aversion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
