The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods
Abstract
Does the period over which individuals evaluate outcomes influence their investment in risky assets? Results from this study show that the more frequently returns are evaluated, the more risk averse investors will be. The results are in line with the behavioral hypothesis of “myopic loss aversion,” which assumes that people are myopic in evaluating outcomes over time, and are more sensitive to losses than to gains. The results have relevance for the equity premium puzzle, and also for the marketing strategies of fund managers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Laboratory studies have since demonstrated that humans can show loss aversion for objects such as mugs (22), money (23), and simulated investments (24, 25).”
From Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion (2009) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(85)90061-3 · Cited by 5,764
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (2013) · World Scientific handbook in financial economic series · doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0016 · Cited by 5,379
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118511 · Cited by 2,487
Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking.
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17 · Cited by 2,043
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Samuelson Paul, 1963, Scientia, 108
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 998
Demand for information by gender: An experimental study
Sharma, K., & Castagnetti, A. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.012 · Cited by 7
Equity Concerns Are Narrowly Framed
Exley, C. L., & Kessler, J. B. (2024) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20220266 · Cited by 17
Income Tax Avoidance and Evasion
degl’Innocenti, D. G., & Rablen, M. D. (2016) · Public Finance Review · doi:10.1177/1091142116676362 · Cited by 7
Wendy, W., & Asri, M. (2012) · Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (Universitas Gadjah Mada) · doi:10.22146/jieb.6243 · Cited by 8
Markle, A. B., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2918 · Cited by 7
Challenge-seeking and the gender wage gap: A lab-in-the-field experiment with cleaning personnel
von Bieberstein, F., Jaussi, S., & Vogel, C. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.037 · Cited by 7
Return smoothing in life insurance from a client perspective
Ruß, J., & Schelling, S. (2021) · Insurance Mathematics and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.03.012 · Cited by 7
Escalating commitment to a failing course of action — A re-examination
Martens, N., & Orzen, H. (2021) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103811 · Cited by 6
Solving some financial puzzles with prospect theory and mental accounting : a survey
Broihanne, M., Merli, M., & Roger, P. (2008) · Revue d économie politique · doi:10.3917/redp.184.0475 · Cited by 10
Improving decisions with market information: an experiment on corporate prediction markets
Dianat, A., & Siemroth, C. (2020) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-020-09654-y · Cited by 7
Negative Recency, Randomization Device Choice, and Reduction of Compound LotteriesPreprint
Kaivanto, K., & Kroll, E. B. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1810941 · Cited by 7
To Look or Not to Look: Financial Attention and Online Account LoginsPreprint
Sicherman, N., Loewenstein, G. F., Seppi, D. J., & Utkus, S. P. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2120955 · Cited by 7
Risk in Time: The Intertwined Nature of Risk Taking and Time Discounting
Epper, T., & Fehr-Duda, H. (2023) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvad041 · Cited by 83
Casal, S., Ploner, M., & Sproten, A. N. (2018) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12575 · Cited by 6
Measurement of risk preference
Filiz, I., Nahmer, T., Spiwoks, M., & Gubaydullina, Z. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100355 · Cited by 4
Effects of lockdowns in shaping socioeconomic behaviors
Bao, Z., Cao, J., Gangadharan, L., Huang, D., & Lin, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2405934121 · Cited by 6
Negociación y preferencias económicas por género: evidencia experimental en México
Arceo-Gómez, E. O., Campos-Vázquez, R. M., Cortina, E. M. M., & Grajales, R. V. (2018) · El Trimestre Económico · doi:10.20430/ete.v85i339.523 · Cited by 6
Taking more risk tomorrow: time horizons and investment decisions
Rieger, M. O., Nguyen, T. M., Schnur, B., & Wang, M. (2020) · Applied Economics Letters · doi:10.1080/13504851.2020.1761522 · Cited by 6
When are two portfolios better than one? A prospect theory approach
Meunier, L., & Ohadi, S. (2022) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-022-09901-z · Cited by 7
Background risk and risk-taking – evidence from the field
Kleemann, L., & Riekhof, M. (2022) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x22000274 · Cited by 6
Coutts, A. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.11.027 · Cited by 9
Skill, Effort, Luck: The Impact of Rankings on Risk-Taking in a Social Setting
Krull, S., Pelster, M., & Steinorth, P. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100924 · Cited by 7
Gender Differences in Advice Giving
Osun, E. B. (2021) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-024-09846-w · Cited by 6
Holt-Laury as a gumball machine
Vasco, M., & Francisco, M. J. V.-D. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0320576 · Cited by 6
VALUATIONS OF CHANGES IN RISKS: THE REFERENCE STATE AND EVIDENCE OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE MEASURES
Zong, J., & Knetsch, J. L. (2013) · The Singapore Economic Review · doi:10.1142/s021759081350001x · Cited by 6
Expectations-Based Reference-Dependent Consumption and Portfolio Choice: Evidence from the Lab
Pagel, M., & Zeppenfeld, C. (2013) · Cited by 6
Esteky, S., Wineman, J., & Wooten, D. B. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1024 · Cited by 6
Lazarev, E., & Mironova, V. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.005 · Cited by 6
Can self-assessed risk attitudes predict behavior under risk? Evidence from a field study in China
He, P. (2018) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2018.08.043 · Cited by 6
Kinek nincs ma bankszámlája Magyarországon?
Horn, D., & Kiss, H. J. (2019) · Hitelintézeti szemle · doi:10.25201/hsz.18.4.3554 · Cited by 6
Brunette, M., & Poufoun, J. N. (2021) · The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review · doi:10.1057/s10713-021-00062-7 · Cited by 6
Investing other People’s Money
Füllbrunn, S., Kvaløy, O., & Luhan, W. J. (2021) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3970404 · Cited by 6
Adaptive Portfolio Allocation with Options
Ben‐Zion, U., Haruvy, E. E., & Shavit, T. (2004) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1207/s15427579jpfm0501_5 · Cited by 6
An endowment effect for risk levels: Evidence from a Ugandan lab
Clist, P., D’Exelle, B., & Verschoor, A. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.013 · Cited by 7
How Investors Face Financial Risk: Loss Aversion and Wealth Allocation
Rengifo, E. W., & Trifan, E. (2010) · Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra (JCC) The Business and Economics Research Journal · doi:10.7835/jcc-berj-2010-0037 · Cited by 6
MarketversusResidence Principle: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of a Financial Transaction Tax
Huber, J., Kirchler, M., Kleinlercher, D., & Sutter, M. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12339 · Cited by 6
Aloysius, J. A. (2005) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.006 · Cited by 7
Implications of behavioral decision theory for health marketing
Jones, S. C. (2007) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593107073846 · Cited by 6
Decisions in financial economics: An experimental study of discount rates
Ben‐Zion, U., & Yagil, J. (2004) · Advances in financial economics · doi:10.1016/s1569-3732(02)07002-0 · Cited by 6
Faurie, C., Mettling, C., Bchir, M. A., Hadmoko, D. S., Heitz, C., Lestari, E. D., Michel Raymond, A., & Willinger, M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep37745 · Cited by 6
International Evidence on the Equity Premium Puzzle and Time Discounting
Rieger, M. O., Wang, M., & Hens, T. (2020) · World Scientific series in finance · doi:10.1142/9789811221958_0012 · Cited by 6
Behavioral Portfolio Theory and Investment Management
Rengifo, E. W., Trendafilov, R., & Trifan, E. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118813454.ch23 · Cited by 7
Sometimes Less Is More – The Influence of Information Aggregation on Investment DecisionsPreprint
Laudenbach, C., & Weber, M. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2159648 · Cited by 6
THE IMPACT OF DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS ON SUBJECTIVE FINANCIAL RISK TOLERANCE: A SOUTH AFRICAN STUDY
Metherell, C. (2011) · ResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal) · Cited by 6
MTurk ‘Unscrubbed’: Exploring the Good, the ‘Super’, and the Unreliable on Amazon's Mechanical TurkPreprint
Deetlefs, J., Chylinski, M., & Ortmann, A. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2654056 · Cited by 6
When Expectations Become Aspirations: Reference-Dependent Preferences and Liquidity ConstraintsPreprint
Kramer, B. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2669001 · Cited by 6
A Stream of Prospects or a Prospect of Streams: On the Evaluation of Intertemporal Risks
James Andreoni, A., Feldman, P., & Sprenger, C. D. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24075 · Cited by 6
Higher Order Risk Preferences: New Experimental Measures, Determinants and Field BehaviorPreprint
Schneider, S. O., & Sutter, M. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3687122 · Cited by 6
This Time Is Different: On Similarity and Risk Taking After Experienced Gains and LossesPreprint
Heinke, S., Leuenberger, A., & Rieskamp, J. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3691829 · Cited by 5
Do Gender Preference Gaps Impact Policy Outcomes?Preprint
Ranehill, E., & Weber, R. A. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3071682 · Cited by 6
Gender Differences in Willingness to Compete: The Role of Public ObservabilityPreprint
Buser, T., Ranehill, E., & van Veldhuizen, R. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2997071 · Cited by 6
Dynamic Inconsistency in Risky Choice: Evidence from the Lab and Field
Heimer, R. Z., Iliewa, Z., Imas, A., & Weber, M. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w30910 · Cited by 6
How Ethical Should AI Be? How AI Alignment Shapes the Risk Preferences of LLMsPreprint
Ouyang, S., Yun, H., & Zheng, X. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4851711 · Cited by 6
Investor Valuation for Socially Responsible Assets: A Willingness to Pay Experiment
Brodback, D., Guenster, N. K., Pouget, S., & Wang, R. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.01349 · Cited by 43
Behavioral consequences of religious schooling
Siddique, A. (2023) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103237 · Cited by 20
Nigus, H. Y., Mohnen, P., & Nillesen, E. (2024) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbae033 · Cited by 7
Social norm uncertainty: Measurement using coordination games and behavioral relevance
Schmidt, R. J. (2025) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106937 · Cited by 7
Does the Color of Feedback Affect Investment Decisions?
Shavit, T., Rosenboim, M., & Cohen, C. (2013) · International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics · doi:10.4018/ijabe.2013070102 · Cited by 5
Optimal frequency of portfolio evaluation in a choice experiment with ambiguity and loss aversion
Bellemare, C., Kröger, S., & Sossou, K. M. (2020) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.11.003 · Cited by 4
Insurance demand experiments: Comparing crowdworking to the lab
Jaspersen, J. G., Ragin, M. A., & Sydnor, J. (2022) · Journal of Risk & Insurance · doi:10.1111/jori.12402 · Cited by 5
Jelschen, H., & Schmidt, U. (2023) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-023-09411-5 · Cited by 8
Cerroni, S., Bozzola, M., & Rippo, R. (2023) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781800622289.0006 · Cited by 5
Peer effects through receiving advice in job search: An experimental study
Horváth, G. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.10.024 · Cited by 5
Risk preferences and risk perceptions in insurance experiments: some methodological challenges
Harrison, G. W. (2024) · The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review · doi:10.1057/s10713-024-00097-6 · Cited by 5
The equity premium puzzle: new evidence on the optimal holding period and optimal asset allocation
Zervoudi, E. K., & Spyrou, S. I. (2016) · Review of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1108/rbf-12-2014-0052 · Cited by 6
For whom does social comparison induce risk-taking?
Dijk, O. (2016) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-016-9578-4 · Cited by 7
Are financial retirement incentives more effective if pension knowledge is high?
Giesecke, M. N., & Yang, G. (2017) · Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance · doi:10.1017/s1474747217000439 · Cited by 5
Waichman, I., & von Blanckenburg, K. (2019) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.06.004 · Cited by 5
Gender Differences in Willingness to Compete: The Role of Culture and Institutions
Booth, A. L., Fan, E. T., Meng, X., & Zhang, D. (2016) · ANU Press eBooks · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2872621 · Cited by 5
Focusing on volatility information instead of portfolio weights as an aid to investor decisions
Ehm, C., Laudenbach, C., & Weber, M. (2017) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-017-9537-0 · Cited by 5
Alan, Ş., Ertaç, S., & Gümüş, İ. (2021) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.13001 · Cited by 5
Relative risk taking and social curiosity
Celse, J., Karakostas, A., & Zizzo, D. J. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.04.016 · Cited by 5
Elicitation of risk preferences through satisficing
Ranganathan, K., & Lejarraga, T. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100570 · Cited by 5
How do antitrust regimes impact on cartel formation and managers’ labor market? An experiment
Fonseca, M. A., Gonçalves, R., Pinho, J., & Tabacco, G. A. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.031 · Cited by 5
Loss aversion in the control of attention
Kim, S., Beck, M. R., & Cho, Y. S. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02287-1 · Cited by 5
Understanding mathematics anxiety: loss aversion and student engagement
Shabab, C. R. (2023) · Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA · doi:10.1093/teamat/hrad008 · Cited by 15
Modeling of Policyholder Behavior for Life Insurance and Annuity Products
Campbell, J., Chan, M., Li, K., Lombardi, L. J., Lombardi, L., Purushotham, M., & Rao, A. (2014) · Cited by 5
As you like it: Explaining the popularity of life‐cycle funds with multi cumulative prospect theory
Graf, S., Ruß, J., & Schelling, S. (2019) · Risk Management and Insurance Review · doi:10.1111/rmir.12122 · Cited by 5
Household bargaining and spending on children: Experimental evidence from Tanzania
Ringdal, C., & Sjursen, I. H. (2017) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2017/354-7 · Cited by 5
Can Rationing Rules for Common Resources Impact Self-insurance Decisions?
Lefebvre, M. (2013) · Strategic Behavior and the Environment · doi:10.1561/102.00000029 · Cited by 5
Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing on a Risk-Value WorldPreprint
Franke, G., & Weber, M. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.313979 · Cited by 4
Digit Ratio and Risk Taking: Evidence from a Large, Multi-Ethnic SamplePreprint
Brañas‐Garza, P., Galizzi, M. M., & Nieboer, J. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 5
A Portfolio of Dilemmas: Experimental Evidence on Choice Bracketing in a Mini-Trust GamePreprint
Ding, J. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2041155 · Cited by 6
Active and Passive Risk-Taking
König-Kersting, C. (2021) · AEA Randomized Controlled Trials · doi:10.1257/rct.7271-1.0 · Cited by 5
Think Twice Before Running! Bank Runs and Cognitive AbilitiesPreprint
Kiss, H. J., Rodríguez-Lara, I., & Rosa-García, A. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2522472 · Cited by 5
Rank Matters - The Impact of Social Competition on Portfoilio ChoicePreprint
Dijk, O., Holmén, M., & Kirchler, M. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2205616 · Cited by 5
Superstars Need Social Benefits: An Experiment on Network FormationPreprint
van Leeuwen, B., Offerman, T., & Schram, A. J. H. C. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2307837 · Cited by 5
Looming Large or Seeming Small? Attitudes Towards Losses in a Representative SamplePreprint
Chapman, J., Snowberg, E., Wang, S., & Camerer, C. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4154089 · Cited by 6
Dynamic Inconsistency in Risky Choice: Evidence from the Lab and FieldPreprint
Heimer, R. Z., Iliewa, Z., Imas, A., & Weber, M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4349543 · Cited by 5
The Weight of Personal Experience: an Experimental MeasurementPreprint
Maniadis, Z., & Miller, J. B. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 5
Vassalos, M., Hu, W., Woods, T. A., Schieffer, J., & Dillon, C. R. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.142506 · Cited by 5
Understanding Gender Differences in Leadership
Alan, Ş., Ertaç, S., Kubilay, E., & Lóránth, G. (2019) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uez050 · Cited by 4
Schuch, E., Nhim, T., & Richter, A. P. (2022) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108547 · Cited by 4
Initially contestable property rights and Coase: Evidence from the lab
Friesen, L., MacKenzie, I. A., & Nguyen, M. P. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102842 · Cited by 4
Nhim, T., Schuch, E., & Richter, A. P. (2023) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107932 · Cited by 4
The Signals We Give: Performance Feedback, Gender, and Competition
Coutts, A., Koh, B. H., & Murad, Z. (2026) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2024.05001 · Cited by 4
Are women more risk-Averse than men regarding investment decision?
Sengupta, S., & Mitra, S. (2024) · Journal of Management Research and Analysis · doi:10.18231/j.jmra.2024.020 · Cited by 8
Controlling for initial endowment and experience in binary choice tasks
Fatás, E., Jiménez, F. J., & Morales, A. J. (2011) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-011-9128-y · Cited by 5
Coping with complexity – Experimental evidence for narrow bracketing in multi-stage contests
Stracke, R., Kerschbamer, R., & Sunde, U. (2017) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.07.001 · Cited by 4
Understanding Investor Behaviour
Cruciani, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68234-1_1 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Gneezy, U., & Potters, J.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- ORCID
- Potters, J.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 631-645
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W1565295770
- Cited by
- 1,288
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Keywords
- risk-taking, evaluation period, myopic loss aversion, loss aversion, risky asset investment, behavioral finance, equity premium puzzle, investor risk aversion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review