Cited by 1,288Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods

Gneezy, U., Potters, J.·1997·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

DOI 10.1162/003355397555217

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Does the period over which individuals evaluate outcomes influence their investment in risky assets? Results from this study show that the more frequently returns are evaluated, the more risk averse investors will be. The results are in line with the behavioral hypothesis of “myopic loss aversion,” which assumes that people are myopic in evaluating outcomes over time, and are more sensitive to losses than to gains. The results have relevance for the equity premium puzzle, and also for the marketing strategies of fund managers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355397555217

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Choices, values, and frames.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
The equity premium: A puzzle
Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(85)90061-3 · Cited by 5,764
Choices, Values, and Frames
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (2013) · World Scientific handbook in financial economic series · doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0016 · Cited by 5,379
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118511 · Cited by 2,487
Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking.
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17 · Cited by 2,043

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Samuelson Paul, 1963, Scientia, 108

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 998

Regulatory performance of audit tournaments and compliance observability
Cason, T. N., Friesen, L., & Gangadharan, L. (2016) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.009 · Cited by 50
Behavioral finance: insights from experiments I: theory and financial markets
Duxbury, D. (2015) · Review of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1108/rbf-03-2015-0011 · Cited by 62
Clumped or Piecewise? Evidence on Preferences for Information
Zimmermann, F. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1884 · Cited by 47
The Impact of Asset Repurchases and Issues in an Experimental Market
Haruvy, E. E., NOUSSAIR, C. N., & Powell, O. (2013) · European Finance Review · doi:10.1093/rof/rft007 · Cited by 50
Multiple Switching and Data Quality in the Multiple Price List
Yu, C. W., Zhang, Y. J., & Zuo, S. X. (2020) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00895 · Cited by 49
How does investor confidence lead to trading? Linking investor return experiences, confidence, and investment beliefs
Hoffmann, A. O. I., & Post, T. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2016.09.003 · Cited by 49
Stereotypes and false consensus: How financial professionals predict risk preferences
Roth, B., & Voskort, A. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.05.006 · Cited by 47
Closing the gender gap in competitiveness through priming
Balafoutas, L., Fornwagner, H., & Sutter, M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06896-6 · Cited by 47
Religion, minority status, and trust: Evidence from a field experiment
Gupta, G., Mahmud, M., Maitra, P., Mitra, S., & Neelim, A. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.028 · Cited by 47
Risk Attitude and Market Behavior: Evidence from Experimental Asset MarketsPreprint
Fellner-Röhling, G., & Maciejovsky, B. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.390105 · Cited by 47
Do casinos pay their customers to become risk-averse? Revising the house money effect in a field experiment
Rüdisser, M., Flepp, R., & Franck, E. P. (2016) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-016-9509-9 · Cited by 48
Volatility Inadaptability: Investors Care About Risk, but Cannot Cope with Volatility
Ehm, C., Kaufmann, C., & Weber, M. (2013) · European Finance Review · doi:10.1093/rof/rft032 · Cited by 47
Measuring risk aversion and the wealth effect
Heinemann, F. W. (2008) · Research in experimental economics · doi:10.1016/s0193-2306(08)00005-7 · Cited by 44
On the role of monetary incentives in risk preference elicitation experiments
Hackethal, A., Kirchler, M., Laudenbach, C., Razen, M., & Weber, A. (2022) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-022-09377-w · Cited by 50
Income and Consumption: A Micro Semistructural Analysis with Pervasive Heterogeneity
Alan, Ş., Browning, M., & Ejrnæs, M. (2018) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/699186 · Cited by 44
In Sickness but Not in Wealth
Galizzi, M. M., Miraldo, M., & Stavropoulou, C. (2016) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x15626406 · Cited by 44
Collusion through communication in auctions
Agranov, M., & Yariv, L. (2017) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2017.10.021 · Cited by 43
EXPERIMENTAL AND SELF‐REPORTED MEASURES OF RISK TAKING AND DIGIT RATIO (2D:4D): EVIDENCE FROM A LARGE, SYSTEMATIC STUDY
Brañas‐Garza, P., Galizzi, M. M., & Nieboer, J. (2018) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/iere.12299 · Cited by 51
New Directions for IPE: Drawing From Behavioral Economics
Elms, D. (2008) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00772.x · Cited by 43
Framing effects and impatience: Evidence from a large scale experiment
van der Heijden, E., Klein, T. J., Müller, W., & Potters, J. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.09.017 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Household Bargaining and Spending on Children: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania
Ringdal, C., & Sjursen, I. H. (2020) · Economica · doi:10.1111/ecca.12353 · Cited by 43
From boom ‘til bust: How loss aversion affects asset prices
Berkelaar, A., & Kouwenberg, R. R. P. (2008) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.10.019 · Cited by 41
Estimating risky behavior with multiple-item risk measures
Menkhoff, L., & Sakha, S. (2017) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2017.02.005 · Cited by 43
Behavioral Finance: An IntroductionPreprint
Baltussen, G. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1488110 · Cited by 46
Improving the National Flood Insurance Program
Kunreuther, H. C. (2018) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.26 · Cited by 42
Prospect Theory and the Brain
Fox, C. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-416008-8.00042-5 · Cited by 48
Higher-order risk preferences in social settings
Heinrich, T., & Mayrhofer, T. (2017) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-017-9541-4 · Cited by 44
Self-control and crime revisited: Disentangling the effect of self-control on risk taking and antisocial behavior
Friehe, T., & Schildberg-Hörisch, H. (2016) · International Review of Law and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.irle.2016.11.001 · Cited by 47
Psychology-based Models of Asset Prices and Trading VolumePreprint
Barberis, N. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3177616 · Cited by 43
Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution
Ranehill, E., & Weber, R. A. (2022) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8 · Cited by 45
Does Market Experience Attenuate Risk Aversion? Evidence from Landed Farm Households in Ethiopia
Melesse, M. B., & Cecchi, F. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.011 · Cited by 39
Risk taking on behalf of others: The role of social distance
Montinari, N., & Rancan, M. (2018) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-018-9286-2 · Cited by 43
The role of psychological resilience and positive affect in risky decision‐making
Xing, C., & Sun, J. (2012) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.729840 · Cited by 46
Aspirations as reference points: an experimental investigation of risk behavior over time
Hoffmann, A. O. I., Henry, S. F., & Kalogeras, N. (2012) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-012-9323-6 · Cited by 40
Using Insights From Behavioral Economics and Social Psychology to Help Patients Manage Chronic Diseases
Mogler, B. K., Shu, S. B., Fox, C. R., Goldstein, N. J., Victor, R. G., Escarce, J. J., & Shapiro, M. F. (2012) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2261-8 · Cited by 43
Do financial advisors exhibit myopic loss aversion?
Eriksen, K. W., & Kvaløy, O. (2009) · Financial markets and portfolio management · doi:10.1007/s11408-009-0124-z · Cited by 41
Causes, consequences, and cures of myopic loss aversion - An experimental investigation
Fellner-Röhling, G., & Sutter, M. (2005) · Econstor (Econstor) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1083998 · Cited by 39
Gender effects for loss aversion: Yes, no, maybe?
Bouchouicha, R., Deer, L., Eid, A. G., McGee, P. J., Schoch, D., Stojić, H., Ygosse-Battisti, J., & Vieider, F. M. (2019) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-019-09315-3 · Cited by 45
Varieties of risk preference elicitation
Friedman, D., Habib, S., James, D., & Williams, B. (2022) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2022.02.002 · Cited by 39
Revealing a Preference for Mixtures: An Experimental Study of Risk
Feldman, P., & Rehbeck, J. (2020) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3543826 · Cited by 39
The Loss Aversion/Narrow Framing Approach to the Equity Premium Puzzle
Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044450899-7.50011-7 · Cited by 36
Professional identity and the gender gap in risk-taking. Evidence from field experiments with scientists
Drupp, M. A., Khadjavi, M., Riekhof, M., & Voss, R. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.020 · Cited by 38
oTree: The “bomb” risk elicitation task
Holzmeister, F., & Pfurtscheller, A. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2016.03.004 · Cited by 38
Gender, risk tolerance, and false consensus in asset allocation recommendations
Bollen, N. P. B., & Posavac, S. S. (2017) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.10.016 · Cited by 38
When fairness neither satisfies nor motivates: The role of risk aversion and uncertainty reduction in attenuating and reversing the fair process effect
Desai, S. D., Sondak, H., & Diekmann, K. A. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.06.004 · Cited by 40
How Price Path Characteristics Shape Investment Behavior
Nolte, S., & Schneider, J. C. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.07.018 · Cited by 38
Identity, Overconfidence, and Investment DecisionsPreprint
D’Acunto, F. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2641182 · Cited by 38
Beliefs and Utility: Experimental Evidence on Preferences for InformationPreprint
Falk, A., & Zimmermann, F. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2851750 · Cited by 39
Experimenting with Measurement Error: Techniques with Applications to the Caltech Cohort Study
Gillen, B., Snowberg, E., & Yariv, L. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21517 · Cited by 38
Stake effects on ambiguity attitudes for gains and losses
Bouchouicha, R., Martinsson, P., Medhin, H., & Vieider, F. M. (2017) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-016-9585-5 · Cited by 39
On the priming of risk preferences: The role of fear and general affect
Alempaki, D., Starmer, C., & Tufano, F. (2019) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2018.12.011 · Cited by 38
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents
König-Kersting, C., Pollmann, M. M. H., Potters, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2020) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-020-09773-1 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Do women panic more than men? An experimental study of financial decisions
Kiss, H. J., Rodríguez-Lara, I., & Rosa-García, A. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2014.06.003 · Cited by 37
Misperceiving the value of information in predicting the performance of others
Loewenstein, G. F., Moore, D. A., & Weber, R. A. (2006) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9128-y · Cited by 37
Overcoming the winner's curse: an adaptive learning perspective
Bereby‐Meyer, Y., & Brit Grosskopf, A. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.566 · Cited by 35
Risk-taking on behalf of others
Eriksen, K. W., Kvaløy, O., & Luzuriaga, M. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100283 · Cited by 36
Beliefs and Utility: Experimental Evidence on Preferences for InformationPreprint
Falk, A., & Zimmermann, F. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2834222 · Cited by 36
Myopic loss aversion, reference point, and money illusion
He, X. D., & Zhou, X. Y. (2014) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/14697688.2014.917805 · Cited by 33
Can simple advice eliminate the gender gap in willingness to compete?
Kessel, D., Möllerström, J., & van Veldhuizen, R. (2021) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103777 · Cited by 35
Cultural evolutionary behavioural science in public policy
Schimmelpfennig, R., & Muthukrishna, M. (2023) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2022.40 · Cited by 36
Multiple prospect framing and decision behavior: The mediational roles of perceived riskiness and perceived ambiguity
Venkatraman, S., Aloysius, J. A., & Davis, F. D. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.006 · Cited by 37
The Aversion to the Sequential Resolution of Uncertainty
Palacios‐Huerta, I. (1999) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1023/a:1007897312164 · Cited by 32
Myopic Loss Aversion: Information Feedback vs. Investment FlexibilityPreprint
Bellemare, C., Krause, M. U., Kröger, S., & Zhang, C. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.557822 · Cited by 35
Can Myopic Loss Aversion Explain the Equity Premium Puzzle? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Professional Traders
Larson, F., List, J. A., & Metcalfe, R. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w22605 · Cited by 39
Neural Correlates of Direct Access Trading in a Real Stock Market: An fMRI Investigation
Raggetti, G., Ceravolo, M. G., Fattobene, L., & Dio, C. D. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00536 · Cited by 36
Evolution and consumer psychology
Durante, K. M., & Griskevicius, V. (2017) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1001 · Cited by 41
Rainfall shocks and risk aversion: Evidence from Southeast Asia
Liebenehm, S., Degener, N., & Strobl, E. (2018) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12403 · Cited by 27
Protecting the ego: Motivated information selection and updating
Castagnetti, A., & Schmacker, R. (2022) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.104007 · Cited by 35
Generality, repetition, and the role of descriptive learning models
Erev, I., & Haruvy, E. E. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2005.06.009 · Cited by 34
Prior interaction, identity, and cooperation in the Inter-group Prisoner's Dilemma
Cason, T. N., Lau, S. P., & Mui, V. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.08.002 · Cited by 34
A Note on Loss Aversion and Futures Hedging
Lien, D. (2001) · Journal of Futures Markets · doi:10.1002/fut.1704 · Cited by 32
Nudges and signposts: The effect of smart defaults and pictographic risk information on retirement saving investment choices
Camilleri, A. R., Cam, M., & Hoffmann, R. F. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2122 · Cited by 37
Individual versus group choices of repeated game strategies: A strategy method approach
Cason, T. N., & Mui, V. (2019) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.01.003 · Cited by 33
Context matters
Zhou, W., & Hey, J. D. (2017) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-017-9546-z · Cited by 33
Narrow Framing and Long-Term Care Insurance
Gottlieb, D., & Mitchell, O. S. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21048 · Cited by 33
Behavior when the chips are down: An experimental study of wealth effects and exchange media
Stivers, A., Tsang, M., Deaves, R., & Hoffer, A. J. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100323 · Cited by 32
Transcranial direct current stimulation over prefrontal cortex diminishes degree of risk aversion
Ye, H., Chen, S., Huang, D., Wang, S., Jia, Y., & Luo, J. (2015) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.04.050 · Cited by 35
Risk Management Roles of the Public and Private Sector
Kousky, C., & Kunreuther, H. C. (2018) · Risk Management and Insurance Review · doi:10.1111/rmir.12096 · Cited by 32
Converging evidence for greater male variability in time, risk, and social preferences
Thöni, C., & Volk, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2026112118 · Cited by 36
On probabilities and loss aversion
Zank, H. (2008) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-008-9117-z · Cited by 30
Am I My Peer's Keeper? Social Responsibility in Financial Decision MakingPreprint
Füllbrunn, S., & Luhan, W. J. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2618439 · Cited by 32
Sensitivity towards Fear of Electric Shock in Passive Threat Situations
Ring, P., & Kaernbach, C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120989 · Cited by 31
Can Risk‐Averse Households Make Risky Investments? The Role of Trust in Others
Bucciol, A., Cavasso, B., & Zarri, L. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/sjoe.12278 · Cited by 31
oTree: Ready-made apps for risk preference elicitation methods
Holzmeister, F. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2017.08.003 · Cited by 31
Dishonesty under scrutiny
van de Ven, J., & Villeval, M. C. (2015) · Journal of the Economic Science Association · doi:10.1007/s40881-015-0002-6 · Cited by 28
Risk taking of executives under different incentive contracts: Experimental evidence
Lefèbvre, M., & Vieider, F. M. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.10.008 · Cited by 31
I did it your way. An experimental investigation of peer effects in investment choices
Delfino, A., Luigi Marengo, B., & Ploner, M. (2016) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2016.03.005 · Cited by 36
"Last-place Aversion": Evidence and Redistributive Implications
Kuziemko, I., Buell, R. W., Reich, T., & Norton, M. I. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w17234 · Cited by 31
Narrow Bracketing and Dominated ChoicesPreprint
Rabin, M., & Weizsäcker, G. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1013517 · Cited by 31
‘What do we have to lose?’: Local economic decline, prospect theory, and support for Brexit
Carreras, M. (2019) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102094 · Cited by 31
Risk Aversion in a Dynamic Asset Allocation Experiment
Brocas, I., Carrillo, J. D., Giga, A., & Zapatero, F. (2018) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109018001151 · Cited by 29
Gender differences in preferences of adolescents: Evidence from a large-scale classroom experiment
Horn, D., Kiss, H. J., & Lénárd, T. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.015 · Cited by 24
Creativity and Corporate Culture*
Charness, G. B., & Grieco, D. (2023) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uead012 · Cited by 30
Investment preferences and risk perception: Financial agents versus clients
Kling, L., König-Kersting, C., & Trautmann, S. T. (2022) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106489 · Cited by 30
Do people care about loss probabilities?
Zeisberger, S. (2022) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-022-09391-y · Cited by 34
Anti-social behaviour and economic decision-making: Panel experimental evidence in the wake of COVID-19
Lohmann, P. M., Gsottbauer, E., You, J., & Kontoleon, A. V. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.007 · Cited by 53
Myopic loss aversion: Demystifying the key factors influencing decision problem framing
Hardin, A. M., & Looney, C. A. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.005 · Cited by 29
Effect of Descriptive Information and Experience on Automation Reliance
Yuviler-Gavish, N., & Gopher, D. (2011) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811406725 · Cited by 30
Decision Under Risk
Fox, C. R., Erner, C., & Walters, D. J. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch2 · Cited by 34
Investment under uncertainty: Testing the options model with professional tradersPreprint
Haigh, M. S., & List, J. A. (n.d.) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 30

Authors: Gneezy, U., & Potters, J.
Affiliations: Tilburg University (NL)
ORCID: Potters, J.
Venue: The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published: 1997-05-01
Volume: 112
Issue: 2
Pages: 631-645
ISSN: 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
1531-4650
DOI: 10.1162/003355397555217
OpenAlex: W1565295770
Cited by: 1,288
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 50 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 38
FWCI: 5.34
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords: risk-taking, evaluation period, myopic loss aversion, loss aversion, risky asset investment, behavioral finance, equity premium puzzle, investor risk aversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks