Cited by 1,288Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods

Gneezy, U., Potters, J.·1997·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

DOI 10.1162/003355397555217

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Does the period over which individuals evaluate outcomes influence their investment in risky assets? Results from this study show that the more frequently returns are evaluated, the more risk averse investors will be. The results are in line with the behavioral hypothesis of “myopic loss aversion,” which assumes that people are myopic in evaluating outcomes over time, and are more sensitive to losses than to gains. The results have relevance for the equity premium puzzle, and also for the marketing strategies of fund managers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355397555217

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Choices, values, and frames.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
The equity premium: A puzzle
Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(85)90061-3 · Cited by 5,764
Choices, Values, and Frames
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (2013) · World Scientific handbook in financial economic series · doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0016 · Cited by 5,379
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118511 · Cited by 2,487
Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking.
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17 · Cited by 2,043

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Samuelson Paul, 1963, Scientia, 108

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 998

Risk taking and information aggregation in groups
Bougheas, S., Nieboer, J., & Sefton, M. (2015) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2015.08.001 · Cited by 11
A New Method of Measuring Financial Risk Aversion Using Hypothetical Investment Preferences: What Does It Say in the Case of Gender Differences?
Meziani, A. S., & Noma, E. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2018.1431888 · Cited by 13
Risk Aversion, Prudence and Temperance: It Is a Matter of Gap Between Moments
Colasante, A., & Riccetti, L. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2019.100262 · Cited by 13
Hidden Skewness: On the Difficulty of Multiplicative Compounding Under Random Shocks
Ensthaler, L., Nottmeyer, O., Weizsäcker, G., & Zankiewicz, C. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2618 · Cited by 11
Time-inconsistent risk preferences in a laboratory experiment
Ko, K. J., & Huang, Z. J. (2011) · Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting · doi:10.1007/s11156-011-0264-x · Cited by 11
Endowment effects in the risky investment game?
Holden, S. T., & Tilahun, M. (2021) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-021-09821-4 · Cited by 11
The effects of social information and luck on risk behavior of small-scale fishers at Lake Victoria
Dannenberg, A., Diekert, F., & Händel, P. D. (2022) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2022.102493 · Cited by 11
Preventing (panic) bank runs
Kiss, H. J., Rodríguez-Lara, I., & Rosa-García, A. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100697 · Cited by 11
Gender differences in risk attitudes
Filippin, A. (2022) · IZA World of Labor · doi:10.15185/izawol.100.v2 · Cited by 11
Expressive suppression and financial risk taking: A mediated moderation model
Li, Z., Sang, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.005 · Cited by 12
Fairness versus efficiency: how procedural fairness concerns affect coordination
Kurz, V., Orland, A., & Posadzy, K. (2017) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-017-9540-5 · Cited by 11
Do Longer or Shorter Budget Temporal Frames Matter? Numerosity Effects, Mental Budgets, and Purchase Intentions
Liu, H., & Chou, H. (2016) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2016.1204887 · Cited by 12
Risk taking after absolute and relative wealth changes: The role of reference point adaptation
Chao, H., Ho, C., & Qin, X. (2017) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-017-9257-z · Cited by 12
Evaluations of Single‐ and Repeated‐Play Gambles
Wedell, D. H. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0670 · Cited by 10
Genetic Correlates of Economic and Social Risk TakingPreprint
Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Wernerfelt, N., Montgomery, C., & Malhotra, D. K. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2141601 · Cited by 11
Preferences for Observable Information in a Strategic Setting: An ExperimentPreprint
Zylbersztejn, A., Babutsidze, Z., & Hanaki, N. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3506838 · Cited by 11
Too Proud to Stop: Regret in Dynamic DecisionsPreprint
Viefers, P., & Strack, P. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2473538 · Cited by 13
A Theoretical and Experimental Appraisal of Five Risk Elicitation MethodsPreprint
Crosetto, P., & Filippin, A. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2253819 · Cited by 11
Narrow Framing and Long-Term Care InsurancePreprint
Gottlieb, D., & Mitchell, O. S. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2580488 · Cited by 11
Dynamic Inconsistency in Risky Choice: Evidence from the Lab and FieldPreprint
Heimer, R. Z., Iliewa, Z., Imas, A., & Weber, M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4351897 · Cited by 13
Safe options and gender differences in risk attitudes
Crosetto, P., & Filippin, A. (2023) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-022-09400-0 · Cited by 10
Looming Large or Seeming Small? Attitudes Towards Losses in a Representative Sample
Chapman, J., Snowberg, E., Wang, S. W., & Camerer, C. (2025) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdae093 · Cited by 10
How many games are we playing? An experimental analysis of choice bracketing in games
Bland, J. R. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.011 · Cited by 13
The Intergenerational Behavioural Consequences of a Socio-Political Upheaval
Booth, A. L., Meng, X., Fan, E. T., & Zhang, D. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.033 · Cited by 14
Modeling Synchronization Risk among Sustainable Exchange Trade Funds: A Statistical and Network Analysis Approach
Magner, N. S., Lavín, J. F., & Valle, M. A. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10193598 · Cited by 10
Risk-Taking and Asymmetric Learning in Boom and Bust Markets
Kieren, P., Müller-Dethard, J., & Weber, M. (2022) · European Finance Review · doi:10.1093/rof/rfac072 · Cited by 10
Pay all subjects or pay only some? An experiment on decision-making under risk and ambiguity
Aydogan, I., Berger, L., & Théroude, V. (2024) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2024.102757 · Cited by 10
Probability weighting in different domains: The role of affect, fungibility, and stakes
Krawczyk, M. W. (2015) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2015.06.006 · Cited by 10
Myopic loss aversion and market experience
Mayhew, B. W., & Vitalis, A. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.10.007 · Cited by 10
The risk of male success and failure: How performance outcomes along with a high-status identity affect gender identification, risk behavior, and self-esteem
Reinhard, M.-A., Schindler, S., & Stahlberg, D. (2014) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430213507319 · Cited by 10
Curating social image: Experimental evidence on the value of actions and selfies
Holm, H. J., & Samahita, M. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.008 · Cited by 10
Sudden-death aversion: Avoiding superior options because they feel riskier.
Walker, J., Risen, J. L., Gilovich, T. D., & Thaler, R. H. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000106 · Cited by 10
Probability weighting for losses and for gains among smallholder farmers in Uganda
Verschoor, A., & D’Exelle, B. (2020) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-020-09796-8 · Cited by 10
COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION IN A TWO‐STAGE GAME
Bjedov, T., Madiès, T., & Villeval, M. C. (2016) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12325 · Cited by 10
Does age affect the relation between risk and time preferences? Evidence from a representative sample
Wang, Z., Rafaï, I., & Willinger, M. (2022) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/soej.12662 · Cited by 13
Coordination and communication during bank runs
Shakina, E., & Angerer, M. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2018.09.002 · Cited by 10
Early Attentional Modulation by Working Memory Training in Young Adult ADHD Patients during a Risky Decision-Making Task
Jaquerod, M. E., Mesrobian, S. K., Villa, A. E. P., Bader, M., & Lintas, A. (2020) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci10010038 · Cited by 11
Portfolio Composition Choice: A Behavioral Approach
Ben‐Zion, U., & Yagil, J. (2003) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1207/s15427579jpfm0402_05 · Cited by 10
Risk Aversion, Overconfidence and Private Information as Determinants of Majority Thresholds
Attanasi, G., Corazzini, L., Georgantzís, N., & Passarelli, F. (2014) · Pacific Economic Review · doi:10.1111/1468-0106.12070 · Cited by 12
Social Preferences under Risk: the Role of Social DistancePreprint
Montinari, N., & Rancan, M. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 10
Volatility Inadaptability: Investors Care About Risk, But Can't Cope with VolatilityPreprint
Ehm, C., Laudenbach, C., & Weber, M. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1942440 · Cited by 10
Myopic Loss Aversion Revisited: the Effect of Probability Distortions in Choice Under RiskPreprint
Blavatskyy, P. R., & Pogrebna, G. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.754644 · Cited by 10
Behavioral Changes of MTurkers during the COVID-19 PandemicPreprint
Aksoy, B., Chadd, I., Osun, E. B., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3920502 · Cited by 10
Information Aversion
Andries, M., & Haddad, V. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23958 · Cited by 11
Debiasing through experience sampling: The case of myopic loss aversion
Hueber, L., & Schwaiger, R. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.03.026 · Cited by 9
Stated preferences outperform elicited preferences for predicting reported compliance with COVID-19 prophylactic measures
Rafaï, I., Blayac, T., Dubois, D., Duchêne, S., Phu Nguyen-van, B., Ventelou, B., & Willinger, M. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2023.102089 · Cited by 9
Willingness to take risks for sustainability during the COVID-19 pandemic
Meyer, J. (2023) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104796 · Cited by 6
Risk Preferences and Predictions about Others: No Association with 2D:4D Ratio
de Miranda, K. L., Neyse, L., & Schmidt, U. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00009 · Cited by 8
The Effect of Competition on Risk Taking in Contests
Spadoni, L., & Potters, J. (2018) · Games · doi:10.3390/g9030072 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Experimental Economics: A Test-Bed for the Unconditional Basic Income?
Füllbrunn, S., Delsen, L., & Vyrastekova, J. (2019) · Contributions to economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30044-9_7 · Cited by 9
The Creation of Social Norms under Weak Institutions
Diekert, F., Eymess, T., Luomba, J., & Waichman, I. (2022) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/720287 · Cited by 9
Past performance framing and investors’ belief updating: Is seeing long-term returns always associated with smaller belief updates?
Gerhard, P., Hoffmann, A. O. I., & Post, T. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2017.07.007 · Cited by 9
When a nudge is (not) enough: Experiments on social information and incentives
Chen, J., Fonseca, M. A., & Grimshaw, S. B. (2021) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103711 · Cited by 9
Overclaiming is not related to dark triad personality traits or stated and revealed risk preferences
Keller, L., Bieleke, M., Koppe, K. M., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255207 · Cited by 9
The Willingness to Pay for Diversification
Mahmoud, O. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4122 · Cited by 9
Testing the Hayek hypothesis: Recent theoretical and experimental evidence
Al‐Ubaydli, O., Boettke, P. J., & Albrecht, B. C. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270489 · Cited by 8
A Study of Outcome Reporting Bias Using Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes
Crosetto, P., Filippin, A., & Heider, J. (2014) · CESifo Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifu029 · Cited by 9
Belief Bracketing: Can Partitioning Information Change Consumer Judgments?
Shu, S. B., & Wu, G. (2004) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 9
An Axiomatization of Linear Cumulative Prospect Theory with Applications to Portfolio Selection and Insurance DemandPreprint
Schmidt, U., & Zank, H. (2002) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9
Too Proud to Stop: Regret in Dynamic DecisionsPreprint
Viefers, P., & Strack, P. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2465840 · Cited by 10
Psychological and environmental determinants of myopic loss aversionPreprint
Hopfensitz, A., & Wranik, T. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9
Gender and Redistribution: Experimental EvidencePreprint
Buser, T., & Putterman, L. G. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2828087 · Cited by 9
The Spillover Effects of Affirmative Action on Competitiveness and Unethical BehaviorPreprint
Banerjee, R., & Villeval, M. C. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2875822 · Cited by 9
Do Professional Norms in the Banking Industry Favor Risk-Taking?Preprint
Cohn, A., Fehr, E., & Maréchal, M. A. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2929450 · Cited by 9
To pay or not to pay: Measuring risk preferences in lab and fieldPreprint
Brañas‐Garza, P., Mohedano, L. E., Jorrat, D., Orozco-Olvera, V., & Ramirez, E. G. R. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8hknv · Cited by 9
From Boom 'til Bust: How Loss Aversion Affects Asset PricesPreprint
Berkelaar, A., & Kouwenberg, R. R. P. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.229548 · Cited by 9
Myopic Loss Aversion and Investment Decisions: from the Laboratory to the Field
Iqbal, K., Islam, A., List, J. A., & Nguyen, V. T. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28730 · Cited by 9
Ultimatum Game Behavior in a Social-Preferences Vacuum ChamberPreprint
Benndorf, V., Brinkhaus, T. G., & von Siemens, F. A. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3916641 · Cited by 9
The State Dependence of Economic Preferences: Evidence from Daily Structural ElicitationPreprint
Goossens, J. T. G., & Knoef, M. G. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4109220 · Cited by 10
Incentive design for reference-dependent preferences
Jimenez, V. G. (2024) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.03.005 · Cited by 9
Framing the Default Option Right
Meunier, L., Bashirzadeh, Y., & Ohadi, S. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2395 · Cited by 9
Climate change, collective shocks, and intra-community cooperation: Evidence from a public good experiment with farmers and pastoralists
Krendelsberger, A., Alpízar, F., Syll, M. M. A., & van Dijk, H. (2025) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106941 · Cited by 8
Taking gambles at face value: Effects of emotional expressions on risky decisions
Winkielman, P., Trujillo, J. L., Bornemann, B., Knutson, B. D., & Paulus, M. P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958918 · Cited by 11
The predictive power of risk elicitation tasks
Garagnani, M. (2023) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-023-09408-0 · Cited by 8
How beautiful people see the world: Cooperativeness judgments of and by beautiful people
Zylbersztejn, A., Babutsidze, Z., Hanaki, N., & Hopfensitz, A. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.12.020 · Cited by 8
Myopic Loss Aversion under Ambiguity and Gender Effects
Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Ponti, G., & Tomás, J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161477 · Cited by 8
Measuring risk attitudes of smallholder farmers in Uganda: How consistent are results of different methods?
Ihli, H. J., Chiputwa, B., Bauermeister, G.-F., & Mußhoff, O. (2013) · Cited by 8
Enhancing Autonomy to Motivate Effort: An Experiment on the Delegation of Contract Choice
Chaudhry, S. J., & Klinowski, D. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0193-230620160000019005 · Cited by 8
Risky health choices and the Balloon Economic Risk Protocol
Fairley, K., Parelman, J. M., Jones, M., & Carter, R. M. (2019) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.04.005 · Cited by 8
Betting on the lord: Lotteries and religiosity in Haiti
Auriol, E., Delissaint, D., Fourati, M., Miquel‐Florensa, J., & Seabright, P. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105441 · Cited by 9
Background Risk and Small-Stakes Risk Aversion
Mu, X., Pomatto, L., Strack, P., & Tamuz, O. (2024) · American Economic Review Insights · doi:10.1257/aeri.20220480 · Cited by 12
Improving Risky-Choice Predictions Using Response Times
Alós‐Ferrer, C., & Garagnani, M. (2023) · Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics · doi:10.1086/728666 · Cited by 8
The 2D:4D ratio and Myopic Loss Aversion (MLA): An experimental investigation
Teixeira, A. M., Tabak, B. M., & Cajueiro, D. O. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2015.02.005 · Cited by 8
Applying Psychology to Economic Policy Design: Using Incentive Preserving Rebates to Increase Acceptance of Critical Peak Electricity Pricing
Letzler, R. (2007) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 8
Dishonest or professional behavior? Can we tell? A comment on: Cohn et al. 2014, Nature 516, 86–89, “Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry”
Stöckl, T. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2015.10.003 · Cited by 8
Experimenting with new combinations of old ideas
Linde, J. (2012) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 8
Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Matter? Evidence from Rural UgandaPreprint
Ihli, H. J., Chiputwa, B., & Mußhoff, O. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.158146 · Cited by 8
Consistency of Risk Preference Measures and the Role of Ambiguity: An Artefactual Field Experiment from ChinaPreprint
He, P., Veronesi, M., & Engel, S. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2748707 · Cited by 8
Turnover and VolatilityPreprint
Dorn, D., & Huberman, G. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.971132 · Cited by 8
Identity and Choice Under RiskPreprint
D’Acunto, F. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3263787 · Cited by 8
Broad Bracketing for Low Probability Events
Chaudhry, S. J., Hand, M., & Kunreuther, H. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27319 · Cited by 8
Blameable and imperfect: A study of risk-taking and accountability
Aimone, J. A., & Pan, X. S. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.02.007 · Cited by 7
Waterfall Illusion in Risky Choice – Exposure to Outcome-Irrelevant Gambles Affects Subsequent Valuation of Risky Gambles
Guo, J., & Tymula, A. A. (2021) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103889 · Cited by 9
Rather doomed than uncertain: risk attitudes and transmissive behavior under asymptomatic infection
Matthies, K., & Toxvaerd, F. (2022) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s00199-022-01448-y · Cited by 7
Consumer impatience: A key motive for Covid-19 vaccination
Guillon, M., Phu Nguyen-van, B., Ventelou, B., & Willinger, M. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2024.102190 · Cited by 7
A Tale of Two Tails: On the Coexistence of Overweighting and Underweighting of Rare Extreme Events
Epper, T., & Fehr-Duda, H. (2017) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · Cited by 7
Effects of choice observability on risk taking: The role of norms
Grimm, S. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.003 · Cited by 7
Exploration in Teams and the Encouragement Effect: Theory and Experimental Evidence
von Essen, E., Huysentruyt, M., & Miettinen, T. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3494 · Cited by 7
Frame It Again: New Tools for Rational Decision-Making
Bermúdez, J. L. (2020) · Cited by 7
Nudging for Lockdown
Blayac, T., Dubois, D., Duchêne, S., Phu Nguyen-van, B., Rafaï, I., Ventelou, B., & Willinger, M. (2022) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000483 · Cited by 7

Authors: Gneezy, U., & Potters, J.
Affiliations: Tilburg University (NL)
ORCID: Potters, J.
Venue: The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published: 1997-05-01
Volume: 112
Issue: 2
Pages: 631-645
ISSN: 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
1531-4650
DOI: 10.1162/003355397555217
OpenAlex: W1565295770
Cited by: 1,288
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 50 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 38
FWCI: 5.34
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords: risk-taking, evaluation period, myopic loss aversion, loss aversion, risky asset investment, behavioral finance, equity premium puzzle, investor risk aversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks