Cited by 156Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsLiver physiology and pathologyProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 9 of the 40 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Expression of suppressors of cytokine signaling during liver regeneration

Open access

Abstract

The cytokines TNF and IL-6 play a critical role early in liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy (PH). Since IL-6 activates signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs), we examined whether the suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) may be involved in terminating IL-6 signaling. We show here that SOCS-3 mRNA is induced 40-fold 2 hours after surgery. SOCS-2 and CIS mRNA are only weakly induced, and SOCS-1 is not detectable. SOCS-3 induction after PH is transient and correlates with a decrease in STAT-3 DNA binding and a loss of tyrosine 705 phosphorylation. This response is markedly reduced in IL-6 knockout (KO) mice. TNF injection induces SOCS-3 mRNA in wild-type mice (albeit weakly compared with the increase observed after PH) but not in TNF receptor 1 or IL-6 KO mice. In contrast, IL-6 injection induces SOCS-3 in these animals, demonstrating a requirement for IL-6 in SOCS-3 induction. IL-6 injection into wild-type mice also induces SOCS-1, -2, and CIS mRNA, in addition to SOCS-3. Together, these results suggest that SOCS-3 may be a key component in downregulating STAT-3 signaling after PH and that SOCS-3 mRNA levels in the regenerating liver are regulated by IL-6.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

After partial hepatectomy, SOCS-3 mRNA and protein are induced transiently in mouse liver, correlating with STAT-3 activation and inactivation. IL-6 is a major regulator of this SOCS-3 induction, while TNF alone induces a weaker, different SOCS profile.

Key findings

  • PH induces SOCS-3 mRNA 40- to 50-fold at 2 hours, sustained for 4 hours, declining by 8 hours and returning to baseline by 24 hours; SOCS-3 protein is detected from 2 hours through 8–10 hours. SOCS-2 and CIS are only weakly induced (four- to tenfold, sometimes undetectable), and SOCS-1 is not induced.
  • STAT-3 tyrosine 705 phosphorylation and DNA binding are transient after PH: phosphorylation is first detected at 2 hours and decreases to background by 8 hours; robust DNA binding appears at 2 hours and disappears between 3 and 6 hours. Sham-operated mice show weaker STAT-3 DNA binding.
  • In IL-6 KO mice after PH, SOCS-3 mRNA induction is severely reduced and SOCS-3 protein is not detected; STAT-3 tyrosine phosphorylation is weaker and DNA binding is impaired. Densitometry showed approximately a threefold induction of SOCS-3 at 2 hours in WT versus IL-6 KO liver.
  • TNF injection induces SOCS-3 in WT mice (<15-fold) but not in TNF-R1 or IL-6 KO mice; IL-6 injection induces SOCS-3 40- to 60-fold in all three strains and also induces SOCS-1, -2, and CIS, unlike PH.

Methods

  • Male C57BL/6 WT, IL-6 KO, and TNF-R1 KO mice underwent two-thirds partial hepatectomy or sham laparotomy; some mice received intraperitoneal mTNF (25 µg/kg) or hIL-6 (1 mg/kg), with saline controls.
  • Liver tissue was analyzed by Northern blot for SOCS-1, -2, -3, and CIS mRNA normalized to cyclophilin, by EMSA for STAT DNA binding and supershift, and by immunoprecipitation/immunoblot for STAT-3 phosphorylation and SOCS-3 protein.
  • Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test; cell culture controls included IL-6-stimulated AML12, HepG2, and RAW 264.7 cells.

Limitations

  • The paper states that more precise analysis of SOCS-3’s role awaits SOCS-3-transgenic or knockout mice, and that such systems require conditional expression because constitutive expression or ablation causes embryonic death.
  • The paper reports that Western blot detection of CIS, SOCS-1, and SOCS-2 proteins was unsuccessful because commercially available antibodies could not detect these proteins in liver lysates.
  • Evident from the text: the main findings are correlative timing and loss-of-function cytokine/receptor models rather than direct SOCS-3 perturbation; the authors also note that a single IL-6 injection does not faithfully reproduce PH signaling and that other cytokines may contribute to SOCS-3 induction after PH.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci11867

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

9 of 40 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 33
42 of 42
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The STAT family of transcription factors mediates the induction of SOCS genes.

    “Importantly, the STAT family of transcription factors mediates the induction of SOCS genes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    SOCS proteins participate in a feedback loop to inhibit STAT activity as well as cytokine signals.

    “Thus, SOCS proteins participate in a feedback loop to inhibit STAT activity as well as cytokine signals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanisms that downregulate or turn off the cytokine signaling pathways during liver regeneration are unclear.

    “However, the mechanisms that downregulate or”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    TNF levels increase after PH, activating NF-kappaB, which upregulates IL-6 mRNA, resulting in elevated serum levels of IL-6.

    “TNF levels increase after PH, activating the transcription factor, NF-κB, which in turn upregulates IL-6 mRNA, resulting in elevated serum levels of IL-6.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    IL-6 stimulates hepatic STAT-3 by inducing phosphorylation at tyrosine 705, which allows nuclear translocation and DNA binding.

    “IL-6 stimulates hepatic STAT-3 by inducing phosphorylation at tyrosine 705, which allows nuclear translocation and DNA binding.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    STAT-3 induces SOCS-3 mRNA, leading to an increase in SOCS-3 protein levels, which downregulate IL-6-stimulated STAT-3.

    “STAT-3 also induces SOCS-3 mRNA leading to an increase in SOCS-3 protein levels, which downregulate IL-6-stimulated STAT-3.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • SOCS-3 protein is both present and absent at 8 hours

    Minor

    The results describe sustained SOCS-3 protein expression through 8 and 10 hours after PH, whereas the discussion says it is no longer detectable by 8 hours.

  • Figure 5 caption contradicts CIS induction in IL-6 KO mice

    Minor

    The caption says TNF induces neither SOCS-3 nor CIS in IL-6 KO liver, but the results state that CIS is induced in those mice.

  • STAT-3 serine phosphorylation site differs between methods and results

    Minor

    The methods identify an antibody against STAT-3 phosphoserine 729, but the results identify the measured signal as phosphorylation of serine 727.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Plumpe, 1999, Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 31, 235
  2. Akerman, 1992, Am J Physiol, 263, G579
  3. Omori, 1996, Lab Invest, 75, 15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 156

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, J. S., Prichard, L., Schaper, F., Schmitz, J., Stephenson-Famy, A., Rosenfeld, M. E., Argast, G. M., Heinrich, P. C., & Fausto, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Corresponding author
Fausto, Nelson
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2001-05-15
Volume
107
Issue
10
Pages
1285-1292
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013349369
Cited by
156
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • National Institutes of Health (1r43ai023226-01, CA23226)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01 CA074131, R37 CA023226, CA 74131, R01CA023226)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-23226)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (F32 DK09920-01, F32DK009920)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (T32-ES07032-23, T32ES007032)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
suppressor of cytokine signaling, SOCS3, SOCS1, SOCS2, liver regeneration, partial hepatectomy, interleukin-6, TNF-α, STAT3 signaling, tyrosine phosphorylation, IL-6 knockout mice, TNF receptor 1
MeSH terms
Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 Protein, Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Hepatectomy, Liver Regeneration, Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Transcription Factors, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Signal Transduction, Trans-Activators, Antigens, CD, Interleukin-6, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Mice, Knockout, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review