Cited by 928Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 162 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 112 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Microglia in Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Sarlus, Heela, Heneka, Michael T.·2017·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Microglia are brain-resident myeloid cells that mediate key functions to support the CNS. Microglia express a wide range of receptors that act as molecular sensors, which recognize exogenous or endogenous CNS insults and initiate an immune response. In addition to their classical immune cell function, microglia act as guardians of the brain by promoting phagocytic clearance and providing trophic support to ensure tissue repair and maintain cerebral homeostasis. Conditions associated with loss of homeostasis or tissue changes induce several dynamic microglial processes, including changes of cellular morphology, surface phenotype, secretory mediators, and proliferative responses (referred to as an "activated state"). Activated microglia represent a common pathological feature of several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cumulative evidence suggests that microglial inflammatory activity in AD is increased while microglial-mediated clearance mechanisms are compromised. Microglia are perpetually engaged in a mutual interaction with the surrounding environment in CNS; thus, diverse microglial reactions at different disease stages may open new avenues for therapeutic intervention and modification of inflammatory activities. In this Review, the role of microglia in the pathogenesis of AD and the modulation of microglia activity as a therapeutic modality will be discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci90606

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 112 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 59 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 35
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 4
38 of 38
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Aging strongly affects innate immunity and is a major risk factor for Alzheimer's disease.

    “Given that age has a dramatic impact on innate immunity and represents a major risk factor for AD, more longitudinal studies need to be performed and the overall outcome of immune modulation needs to be tested in aged animals.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Existing mouse models do not show clear neurodegeneration or human-like tau pathology unless a tau mutation is used to induce the disease.

    “One limitation of current mouse models is the absence of clear neurodegeneration and human-like tau pathology unless the disease is induced by a tau mutation.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • COX-2 treatment result conflicts with the proposed disease-stage effect

    Minor

    The paper places slow decliners earlier in the disease trajectory and says the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib benefited them. It later suggests that blocking COX-2 in early phases may be harmful.

  • C5a blockade effect conflicts with the cited reference title

    Minor

    The text says blocking C5a increased Aβ levels and associates complement blockade with increased neurodegeneration, citing reference 124. That reference's title instead reports decreased pathology after antagonizing the C5a receptor.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 162 references

1 of the 162 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-051116-052358 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 928

Metadata

Authors
Sarlus, H., & Heneka, M. T.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Heneka, Michael T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
127
Issue
9
Pages
3240-3249
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2750718695
Cited by
911
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 7
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
microglia, Alzheimer's disease, microglial activation, neuroinflammation, phagocytosis, neuroprotection, microglial receptors, neurodegeneration, brain homeostasis
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Central Nervous System, Complement System Proteins, Humans, Immune System, Inflammation, Macrophages, Phagocytosis, Cytokines, Microglia, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Cell Proliferation, Toll-Like Receptors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review