Cited by 65Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Social norm processing in adult social phobia: atypically increased ventromedial frontal cortex responsiveness to unintentional (embarrassing) transgressions

Open access
Blair, Karina S., Geraci, Marilla, Hollon, Nick, Otero, Marcela, DeVido, Jeffrey, Majestic, Catherine, Jacobs, Madeline, Blair, R.J.R. +1 more·2010·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the neural underpinnings of generalized social phobia, which is defined by a persistent heightened fear of social disapproval. Using event-related functional MRI (fMRI), the authors examined whether the intent of an event, which mediates the neural response to social disapproval in healthy individuals, differentially affects response in generalized social phobia. METHOD: Sixteen patients with generalized social phobia and 16 healthy comparison subjects group-matched on age, gender, and IQ underwent fMRI scans while reading stories that involved neutral social events, unintentional social transgressions (e.g., choking on food at a party and coughing it up), or intentional social transgressions (e.g., disliking food at a party and spitting it out). RESULTS: Significant group-by-transgression interactions were observed in ventral regions of the medial prefrontal cortex. Healthy individuals tended to show increased blood-oxygen-level-dependent responses to intentional relative to unintentional transgressions. Patients with generalized social phobia, however, showed significantly increased responses to the unintentional transgressions. They also rated the unintentional transgressions as significantly more embarrassing than did the comparison subjects. Results also revealed significant group main effects in the amygdala and insula bilaterally, reflecting elevated generalized social phobia responses in these regions to all event types. CONCLUSIONS: These results further implicate the medial prefrontal cortex in the pathophysiology of generalized social phobia, specifically through its involvement in distorted self-referential processing. These results also further underscore the extended role of the amygdala and insula in the processing of social stimuli more generally in generalized social phobia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09121797

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is growing emphasis on stimuli with putatively greater ecological validity, such as imagining feared social situations, anticipation of public speaking, performance evaluation, and exposure to social criticism.

    “there has been a growing emphasis on other types of stimuli with putatively greater ecological validity such as imagining feared social situations (Blair et al., 2010; Boehme et al., 2014; Nakao et al., 2011), anticipation of public speaking (Boehme et al., 2013; Cremers et al., 2015), performance evaluation (Gimenez et al., 2012; Koric et al., 2012; Pujol et al., 2013), and exposure to social cr”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]First M Spitzer R Gibbon M Williams J Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blair, K. S., Geraci, M., Hollon, N., Otero, M., DeVido, J., Majestic, C., Jacobs, M., Blair, R. J. R., & Pine, D. S.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • From the Mood and Anxiety Program, NIMH.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-12
Volume
167
Issue
12
Pages
1526-1532
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2167835436
Cited by
65
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
generalized social phobia, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, embarrassment, social disapproval, amygdala, insula, self-referential processing, social rejection
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Emotions, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Phobic Disorders, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review