Cited by 937

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement

Bakker, Arnold B, Tims, Maria, Derks, Daantje·2012·Human Relations

Abstract

The article examines the role of proactive personality in predicting work engagement and job performance. On the basis of the literature on proactive personality and the job demands–resources model, we hypothesized that employees with a proactive personality would be most likely to craft their own jobs, in order to stay engaged and perform well. Data were collected among 95 dyads of employees ( N = 190), who were working in various organizations. The results of structural equation modeling analyses offered strong support for the proposed model. Employees who were characterized by a proactive personality were most likely to craft their jobs (increase their structural and social job resources, and increase their job challenges); job crafting, in turn, was predictive of work engagement (vigor, dedication, and absorption) and colleague-ratings of in-role performance. These findings suggest that, to the extent that employees proactively adjust their work environment, they manage to stay engaged and perform well.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0018726712453471

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Arbuckle JL, 2005, Amos 6.0 User’s Guide
  2. 10.1177/109442819800100104 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/0963721411414534 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1108/13620430810870476 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/a0017525 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/1359432X.2010.485352 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/job.4030140202 · DOI
  8. Bindl U, 2011, Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice, 385
  9. Browne MW, 1993, Personnel Selection in Organizations, 35
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1214 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00221.x · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.532 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200002)21:1<63::AID-JOB8>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  14. 10.1177/0018726706064171 · DOI
  15. Demerouti E, 2010, Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, 147
  16. 10.5465/19416520802211503 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/0149206307308911 · DOI
  20. Fuller JB, 2010, Journal of Managerial Issues, 22, 35
  21. Ghitulescu B (2006) Job crafting and social embeddedness at work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
  22. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01180.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00250.x · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Halbesleben JRB, 2010, Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, 102
  26. 10.1080/02678370802383962 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/109442819923002 · DOI
  28. Hoyle RH, 1995, Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications
  29. 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.002 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/hrdq.20034 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s10869-008-9080-2 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.927 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Marsh HW, 1996, Advanced Structural Equation Modeling, Issues and Techniques, 315
  34. 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.272 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/02678370801979430 · DOI
  36. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000009 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0149206308321554 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/1359432X.2010.532869 · DOI
  39. Parker SK, 2008, Work Motivation: Past, Present, and Future, 233
  40. 10.1177/0149206310363732 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.5465/amj.2006.20786079 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/0013164405282471 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1002/job.595 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1023/A:1015630930326 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Schaufeli WB, 2001, De Psycholoog, 36, 422
  46. Schneider B, 1997, Handbook of Selection and Appraisal, 393
  47. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x · DOI
  48. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1011 · DOI
  50. 10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1080/02678370802393672 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1177/014920639101700305 · DOI
  53. 10.2307/259118 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 937

Metadata

Authors
Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
Venue
Human Relations
Published
2012-09-11
Volume
65
Issue
10
Pages
1359-1378
ISSN
  • 0018-7267
  • 1741-282X
Cited by
937
References
16
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review