Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy

Kaine, Sarah, Josserand, Emmanuel·2019·Journal of Industrial Relations
DOI 10.1177/0022185619865480
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The gig economy has captured public and policy interest and is growing as an area of academic inquiry, prompting debate about the future of work, labour regulation, and the impact of technology and job quality. This special issue provides a timely intervention into that debate with this article providing an introductory overview, positioning the articles within a comprehensive literature review of existing scholarship on the gig economy. These articles add to our understanding of the organisation and experience of work in the digitally enabled gig economy in a variety of national settings. They explore aspects such as job quality, forms of collectivity, identity development, and algorithmic management and control. This article also delineates avenues for further research regarding conditions for gig workers, the impact of gig work and information, technology and gig work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022185619865480

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Abhinav K, Dubey A, Jain S, et al. (2017) CrowdAdvisor: A framework for freelancer assessment in online marketplace. In: IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track (ICSE-SEIP) , 20–28 May, Buenos Aires, pp. 93–102. · DOI
  2. 10.1093/oxrep/gry006 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s10551-018-3975-2 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_25 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bajwa U, 2018, Globalization and Health, 14
  7. 10.1111/ntwe.12038 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1177/1086026619846455 · DOI
  10. 10.1057/s11369-018-00106-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-3-319-49454-8_8 · DOI
  12. 10.1287/msom.2017.0618 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2753/JOA0091-3367400106 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/19376812.2019.1607149 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0893318916687397 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.17645/mac.v6i2.1316 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/1461444817729149 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Daher N, 2018, CNBC @Work
  21. De Stefano V, 2016, Industrial Law Journal, 46, 185, 10.1093/indlaw/dww034 · DOI
  22. De Stefano V, 2016, The Rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork, and Labor Protection in the ‘gig economy’
  23. 10.1177/1056492619832119 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/soej.12338 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/hbm.23086 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/0022185618800518 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/0022185619839428 · DOI
  28. Fox MA, 2018, Environment International, 115
  29. 10.4337/roke.2014.02.03 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Gandhi A, Hidayanto A, Sucahyo Y, et al. (2018) Exploring people’s intention to become platform-based gig workers: An empirical qualitative study. In: 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI) , 22–26 October, Conference Proceedings, pp. 266–271. · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1177/0018726718790002 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1177/0022185618817069 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1017/9781108255882.025 · DOI
  34. 10.17979/ejge.2018.7.1.4330 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/0950017018760136 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Jiang L, Wagner C and Nardi B (2015) Not just in it for the money: A qualitative investigation of workers’ perceived benefits of micro-task crowdsourcing. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 5–8 January Conference Proceedings, pp. 773–782. · DOI
  37. Johnston H, 2018, Organizing On-Demand: Representation, Voice, and Collective Bargaining in the Gig Economy
  38. 10.1177/0022185619848461 · DOI
  39. Kaine S, The Research Agenda for the Future of Work
  40. Kaine S, Contemporary Work and the Future of Employment in Developed Societies
  41. 10.1017/jmo.2016.30 · DOI
  42. Leximancer, 2018, Leximancer User Guide, Release 4.5
  43. 10.1177/1440783319837604 · DOI
  44. Manyika J, 2016, Independent Work: Choice, Necessity, and the Gig Economy
  45. 10.1080/17439884.2018.1504792 · DOI
  46. Minifie J, 2016, Peer to peer pressure: Policy for the sharing economy.
  47. 10.1080/13683500.2019.1618249 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s10672-018-9318-8 · DOI
  49. Prudential, 2017, Gig Workers in America
  50. Prudential, 2018, Gig Economy Impact by Generation
  51. 10.1111/jpim.12312 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Renan-Barzilay A, 2017, Seton Hall Law Review, 47, 393
  53. 10.1016/j.tele.2004.11.007 · DOI
  54. Salinesi C, Kusumah I, Rohleder C, et al. (2018) New approach for supporting future collaborative business in automotive industry. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) , Stuttgart, 17–20 June, Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–9. · DOI
  55. Sarasua C, Thimm M. Crowd work CV: Recognition for micro work. InInternational Conference on Social Informatics 2014 Nov 10 (pp. 429–437). Springer, Cham. · DOI
  56. 10.1177/000312240907400104 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1080/13600869.2018.1457001 · DOI
  58. Scholz T, 2017, Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers are Disrupting the Digital Economy
  59. 10.1177/0730888418762263 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.001 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/s10551-017-3484-8 · DOI
  62. 10.1177/1035304617722461 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/j.trb.2019.04.004 · DOI
  64. 10.1080/1046669X.2017.1347003 · DOI
  65. 10.1177/1461444818773727 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1177/1024258917701381 · DOI
  67. 10.1177/0950017019836911 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Wang J, Pan J and Li Y (2018) The optimal strategies of online car-hailing platform based on the cost difference of drivers. In: 2018 15th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM) , Hangzhou, 21–22 July, Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–5. · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.003 · DOI
  70. 10.4159/9780674726123 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1177/0038038519828906 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1111/ntwe.12112 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1177/0022185619854472 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.03.004 · DOI

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Kaine, S., & Josserand, E.
Venue
Journal of Industrial Relations
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2019-08-20
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
479-501
ISSN
  • 0022-1856 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-9296
DOI
10.1177/0022185619865480
OpenAlex
W2969542118
Cited by
294
References
3
FWCI
44.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.