The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management
Abstract
Because new product development (NPD) teams are engaged in knowledge creation, NPD management should emphasize cognitive team processes rather than purely social processes. Using the notions of tacit knowledge and distributed cognition as a basis, the authors propose that the T-shaped skills, shared mental models, and NPD routines of team members, as well as the A-shaped skills of the team leader, are key design variables when creating NPD teams. The authors propose that trust in team orientation, trust in technical competence, information redundancy, and rich personal interaction are important process variables for the effective and efficient creation of new knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 2×
“Tn a similar vein, Kogut and Zander (1992) differentiate between information (e.g., facts) and know-how (e.g., how to organize factories).”
BackgroundOrganizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science
Hacking, I. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814563 · Cited by 4,814
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426 · cited 1×
“Analysis: Following the guidelines available in the literature (e.g., Eisenhardt, 1989 ), we conducted semi-structured interviews with team members.”
MethodOn Coase, Competence, and the Corporation
(1988) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036942 · Cited by 422
Group intelligence: why some groups are better than others
Williams, W. M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0160-2896(88)90002-5 · Cited by 196
An Approach to a Science of Administration
Stene, E. O. (1940) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1948193 · Cited by 166
Cited by
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.413 · Cited by 2,385
Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0094 · Cited by 1,311
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451 · Cited by 1,152
Designing Virtual Customer Environments for New Product Development: Toward a Theory
Nambisan, S. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389914 · Cited by 1,026
Situated Knowledge and Learning in Dispersed Teams
Sole, D., & Edmondson, A. (2002) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.13.s2.3 · Cited by 452
Buyer-Supplier Collaboration in Product Development Projects
Hoegl, M., & Wagner, S. M. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206304272291 · Cited by 312
The quality of group tacit knowledge
Erden, Z., von Krogh, G., & Nonaka, I. (2008) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2008.02.002 · Cited by 238
The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential
Grant, R., & Phene, A. (2022) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1399 · Cited by 180
Figueroa-Armijos, M., Clark, B. B., & da Motta Veiga, S. P. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05166-2 · Cited by 164
Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management
Hamdoun, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Ben Othman, H. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.031 · Cited by 163
Fieldwork and data collection in qualitative marketing research
Alam, I. (2005) · Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522750510575462 · Cited by 127
Coordinated Exploration for Grand Challenges: The Role of Advocacy Groups in Search Consortia
Olsen, A. Ø., Sofka, W., & Grimpe, C. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0730 · Cited by 110
Product-Service System Design for Sustainability
Vezzoli, C., Kohtala, C., Srinivasan, A., Diehl, J., Fusakul, S. M., Xin, L., & Sateesh, D. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781351278003 · Cited by 66
Amann, J., & Rubinelli, S. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7406 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Madhavan, R., & Grover, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W1982052652
- Cited by
- 1,002
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 17.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
