Cited by 49Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Relationship of exposure to clinically irrelevant emotion cues and obsessive–compulsive symptoms

Allen, Laura B., Barlow, David H.·2009·Behavior Modification

Abstract

Research has highlighted the role of emotion regulation as a common factor underlying emotional disorders. The current study examined the relationship of emotion regulation skills to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. Seven participants with a principal diagnosis of OCD in a multiple-baseline across subjects design were taught the skill of prevention of emotional avoidance in the context of emotion provocation procedures to clinically irrelevant (nonspecific) cues prior to practicing this skill with clinically relevant (OCD-specific) cues. Results suggested successful acquisition of emotion regulation skills (as evidenced by decreased thought suppression and increased acceptance of thoughts and feelings) in clinically irrelevant contexts. Acquisition of this skill was associated with decreases in obsessive-compulsive symptoms, even though clinically relevant cues were not introduced during this phase. Implementation of skills in clinically relevant contexts was associated with greater reductions in OCD symptoms. Discussion focuses on implications for emotion regulatory processes in the maintenance and treatment of emotional disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445509344180

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, L. B., & Barlow, D. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Allen, Laura B.
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2009-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
743-762
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2096734778
Cited by
49
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive symptoms, obsessive-compulsive disorder, emotion regulation, emotion regulation skills, thought suppression, skill acquisition, skill generalization
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Behavior Therapy, Cues, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Personality Assessment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient Selection, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review