Cited by 273Aging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Causal beliefs, social participation, and loneliness among older adults: A longitudinal study

Abstract

Loneliness can be seen as a social failure subject to causal search: Why am I lonely? Why do I lack friends? According to attribution theory, answers to these questions can influence emotions, motivation, and behaviours. This study examined the relationships between various affiliative causal beliefs (i.e., beliefs about loneliness and friendship development), social participation, and loneliness among older adults (72+ years). Cross-sectional and longitudinal (over five years) results showed that more strongly endorsing internal/controllable causal beliefs (i.e., believing that making friends depends on effort) related to greater social participation. Moreover, greater social participation related to less loneliness. External/uncontrollable causal beliefs predicted greater loneliness. In fully addressing loneliness, it may be important to focus on people's causal beliefs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0265407509106718

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative social expectations tend to elicit behaviors from others that confirm the lonely persons' expectations, setting in motion a self-fulfilling prophecy in which lonely people actively distance themselves from would-be social partners even as they believe that the cause of the social distance is attributable to others and is beyond their own control.

    “Negative social expectations tend to elicit behaviors from others that confirm the lonely persons’ expectations, thereby setting in motion a self-fulfilling prophecy in which lonely people actively distance themselves from would-be social partners even as they believe that the cause of the social distance is attributable to others and is beyond their own control [37].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1521/soco.1985.3.1.16 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.127 · DOI
  3. 10.1521/soco.1991.9.2.149 · DOI
  4. Arbuckle, J.L., 1995, Amos for windows. Analysis of moment structures
  5. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00020-5 · DOI
  6. Byrne, B., 2001, Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming
  7. 10.1017/S0714980800010990 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.119 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/01973530701330843 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0164027505279712 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/S0962-1849(99)80008-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/geronb/54B.4.P231 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0146167201273002 · DOI
  14. 10.1353/cja.2004.0022 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00501.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1017/CBO9780511527852 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1353/cja.2004.0023 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/13548500500266607 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Menec, V.H., 1999, Journals of Gerontology: Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 54, 85
  21. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00607.x · DOI
  22. Moore, D., 1987, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 215
  23. 10.1093/geront/21.5.551 · DOI
  24. Peplau, L.A., 1978, Dying, and Death, 2, 207
  25. Peplau, L.A., Russell, D. & Heim, M. (1979). The experience of loneliness. In I. H. Frieze, D. Bar-Tal, & J. S. Carroll (Eds.), New approaches to social problems: Applications of attribution theory (pp. 53-78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  26. 10.1353/cja.2004.0025 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/BF00992156 · DOI
  28. Pinquart, M., 2001, Advances in Psychology Research, 19, 111
  29. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02566.x · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0146167284101007 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0265407588053001 · DOI
  32. Solano, C.H., 1987, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 201
  33. 10.1002/gps.930090502 · DOI
  34. 10.1037/0022-0663.75.4.530 · DOI
  35. Weiner, B., 1971, Perceiving the causes of success and failure
  36. Weiss, R.S., 1973, Loneliness: The experience of social and emotional isolation
  37. 10.1353/cja.2004.0028 · DOI
  38. 10.1017/S0144686X00003457 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Newall, N. E., Chipperfield, J. G., Clifton, R. A., Perry, R. P., Swift, A. U., & Ruthig, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Newall, Nancy E.
Venue
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2009-03
Volume
26
Issue
2-3
Pages
273-290
ISSN
  • 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3608
OpenAlex
W2047673943
Cited by
273
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
loneliness, causal beliefs, attribution theory, social participation (health and rehabilitation), older adults, friendship development, internal-external locus of control, social failure, aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review