Cited by 25Smoking Behavior and CessationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Effects of acute tyrosine depletion on subjective craving and selective processing of smoking-related cues in abstinent cigarette smokers

Munafó, Marcus R., Mannie, Zola N., Cowen, Philip J., Harmer, Catherine J., McTavish, Sarah B.·2007·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

We investigated the impact of the administration of a tyrosine-depleting amino acid mixture compared to a balanced mixture on measures of mood, craving and selective processing of smoking-related cues in healthy cigarette smokers instructed to abstain from smoking for 12 h prior to, and during, the experiment. A modified stroop task was used to index selective processing of smoking-related cues. We observed evidence for an increase in subjective craving among males, and an attenuation of the selective processing of smoking-related cues compared to control cues among females, in the tyrosine-depleting condition compared to the balanced condition. No effects of mixture were observed on measures of subjective mood. These results tentatively support for the role of dopaminergic neurotransmission in mediating the response of cigarette smokers to smoking-related cues. In addition, these results also provide further evidence for sex differences in the factors that maintain cigarette smoking, in particular with respect to conditioned reinforcement of smoking behaviour, and suggest that the relationship between subjective craving and selective processing of smoking-related cues may differ in males and females.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881107077216

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munafó, M. R., Mannie, Z. N., Cowen, P. J., Harmer, C. J., & McTavish, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK,
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2007-11
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
805-814
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W1971149187
Cited by
25
References
49
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
cigarette craving, smoking-related cues, cigarette smokers, smoking abstinence, dopamine signaling, sex differences, conditioned reinforcement, mood, amino acid mixtures
MeSH terms
Adult, Cues, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Characteristics, Smoking, Tyrosine, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review