Cited by 48Fatty Acid Research and HealthTreatment of Major DepressionTryptophan and brain disorders

Effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on mood and emotional information processing in recovered depressed individuals

Antypa, Niki, Smelt, August HM, Strengholt, Annette, Van der Does, AJ Willem·2012·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acids have been reported for several psychiatric disorders, particularly for depression. Association studies show a relationship between omega-3 intake and depression risk. Meta-analyses of clinical trials have shown a moderate effect of supplementation on depressive symptoms, but not on normal mood states. Few studies have investigated effects on cognition. The purpose of this study was to examine effects of omega-3 supplements on cognition and mood of recovered depressed individuals. Seventy-one participants were randomized to receive either omega-3 or placebo for four weeks in a randomized double-blind design. Results showed small effects of omega-3 supplementation on aspects of emotional decision-making and on self-reported states of depression and tension. Some of the effects were confounded by learning effects. No significant effects were observed on memory, attention, cognitive reactivity and depressive symptoms. While inconclusive, the present findings may indicate that omega-3 supplementation has selective effects on emotional cognition and mood in recovered depressed participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881111424928

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in an RCT was effective in improving aspects of emotional information processing in individuals recovered from major depressive disorder.

    “However, supplementation with n-3 PUFAs in an RCT was effective in improving aspects of emotional information processing in individuals recovered from MDD [140].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antypa, N., Smelt, A. H., Strengholt, A., & Van der Does, A. W.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Leiden University, Institute of Psychology, Leiden, The Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-10-16
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
738-743
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2025219503
Cited by
48
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, dietary supplementation, depression, recovered depression, mood, emotional processing, emotional decision-making, cognitive reactivity, memory, attention, tension, learning effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Cognition, Decision Making, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Dietary Supplements, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review