Cited by 67Electrochemical sensors and biosensorsAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

A Miniaturized Nafion-Based Glucose Sensor: in vitro and in vivo evaluation in dogs

Moussy, F., Harrison, D.J., Rajotte, R.V.·1994·The International Journal of Artificial Organs

Abstract

We have developed an implantable glucose sensor based on a new tri-layer membrane configuration. The needle-type sensor integrates a Pt working electrode and a Ag/AgCI reference electrode. Its size is equivalent to a 25 gauge needle (0.5 mm in diamater). Poly (o-phenylenediamine) was used as an inner coating to reduce interference by small compounds present in the body fluids, and the perfluorinated ionomer, Nation as a biocompatible, protective, outer coating. Glucose oxidase trapped in an albumin/glutaraldehyde matrix was sandwiched between these coatings. In vitro tests in buffer showed the sensors had a good selectively, a sensitivity of about 25 nA/mM, and a 90% response time of 33 s. Stabilization of the current following polarization required 10 to 30 min in vitro and 30 to 40 in vivo. Although these sensors remained stable for many weeks in saline solution, their implantation in animals resulted in the degradation of the protective Nation outer coating, which in turn, led to the failure of the incorporated reference electrode. We demonstrated that if unprotected, the AgCI layer of the reference electrode rapidly dissolves in the biological environment. However, we later showed that in vivo degradation of Nation can be prevented by heat curing. When heat cured sensors were subcutaneously implanted in dogs, the sensors' signal closely followed the plasma glucose level during glucose tolerance tests. The response of the sensors implanted in dogs was retained for 10 days.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/039139889401700206

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nafion-coated CGM probes implanted in canines were functional for up to 10 days, but the membranes were unstable, with significant cracking and eventual failure.

    “Moussy et al. implanted Nafion-coated CGM probes into canines that proved functional for up 10 days, but ultimately the membranes were deemed unstable with significant cracking and eventual failure.122”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moussy, F., Harrison, D. J., & Rajotte, R. V.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
The International Journal of Artificial Organs
Published
1994-02
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
88-94
ISSN
  • 0391-3988 (ISSN-L)
  • 1724-6040
OpenAlex
W100441310
Cited by
67
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Artificial Organs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
implantable glucose sensor, Nafion coating, perfluorinated ionomers, poly(o-phenylenediamine), glucose oxidase, Ag/AgCl reference electrode, platinum working electrode, sensor degradation, thermal curing, subcutaneous implantation, glucose tolerance test, dogs
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Blood Glucose, Dogs, Electrodes, Implanted, Fluorocarbon Polymers, Glucose Tolerance Test, Microelectrodes, Monitoring, Physiologic, Biosensing Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review