Cited by 52Collagen: Extraction and CharacterizationTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

A novel porous collagen scaffold around an implantable biosensor for improving biocompatibility. II. Long‐term in vitro/in vivo sensitivity characteristics of sensors with NDGA‐ or GA‐crosslinked collagen scaffolds

Ju, Young Min, Yu, Bazhang, West, Leigh, Moussy, Yvonne, Moussy, Francis·2010·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

We have developed a new 3D porous and biostable collagen scaffold for implantable glucose sensors. The scaffolds were fabricated around the sensors and crosslinked using nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) or glutaraldehyde (GA) to enhance physical and biological stability. The effect of the scaffolds on sensor function and biocompatibility was examined during long‐term (≥28 days) in vitro and in vivo experiments and compared with control bare sensors. To evaluate the effect of the sensor length on micromotion and sensor function, we also fabricated short and long sensors. 3D porous scaffold application around glucose sensors did not significantly affect the long‐term in vitro sensitivity of the sensors. The scaffolds, crosslinked by either NDGA or GA, remained stable around the sensors during the 4 week in vitro study. In the long‐term in vivo study, the sensitivity of the short sensors was higher than the sensitivity of long sensors presumably because of less micromotion in the subcutis of the rats. The sensors with NDGA‐crosslinked scaffolds had a higher sensitivity than the sensors with GA‐crosslinked scaffolds. Histological examination showed that NDGA‐crosslinked scaffolds retained their physical structure with reduced inflammation when compared with the GA‐crosslinked scaffolds. Therefore, the application of NDGA‐crosslinked collagen scaffolds might be a good method for enhancing the function and lifetime of implantable biosensors by minimizing the in vivo foreign body response. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2010

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.32400

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Histological analysis showed improved biocompatibility of NDGA-crosslinked scaffolds compared with GA-crosslinked scaffolds, with less inflammatory cell localization and infiltration.

    “Histological analysis after the experiment revealed improved biocompatibility of the NDGA-crosslinked compared to the GA-cross-linked scaffolds as evidenced by less inflammatory cell localization and infiltration into the porous membranes.”
  • Despite the histological benefits, the analytical performance of control sensors lacking collagen was better than that of collagen-based sensors.

    “Despite the observed histological benefits, the analytical performance of control sensors (i.e., lacking collagen) was better than that of the collagen-based sensors.148”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ju, Y. M., Yu, B., West, L., Moussy, Y., & Moussy, F.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Moussy, Francis
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-20
Volume
92A
Issue
2
Pages
650-658
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2054261405
Cited by
52
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB001640)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
collagen scaffolds, implantable glucose sensor, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, glutaraldehyde, crosslinking, biocompatibility, foreign body reaction, sensor sensitivity, porous scaffolds, inflammation, subcutaneous implantation, sensor lifetime
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Collagen, Cross-Linking Reagents, Glutaral, Male, Materials Testing, Masoprocol, Biosensing Techniques, Porosity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prostheses and Implants, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review