Cited by 277Misinformation and Its ImpactsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationMedia Influence and Politics

Do I Think BLS Data are BS? The Consequences of Conspiracy Theories

Einstein, Katherine Levine, Glick, David M.·2015·Political Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11109-014-9287-z

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases trust in governmental institutions, even if the conspiracy theories are unrelated to those institutions.

    “Experiments show that exposure to conspiracy theories decreases trust in governmental institutions, even if the conspiracy theories are unrelated to those institutions (Einstein & Glick, 2015).”

    From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Einstein & Glick, 2015

  • Exposure to conspiracy theories undermines trust in democratic institutions.

    “Exposure to such theories has been shown to undermine trust in democratic institutions (van Prooijen et al., 2022)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Einstein, K. L., & Glick, D. M.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Einstein, Katherine Levine
Venue
Political Behavior
Published
2014-09-04
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
679-701
ISSN
  • 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6687
OpenAlex
W2100098273
Cited by
277
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
FWCI
28.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
conspiracy theories, conspiracy beliefs, public trust in government, belief elicitation, survey experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review