Cited by 40Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

Private–public mappings in human prefrontal cortex

Open access
Bang, Dan, Ershadmanesh, Sara, Nili, Hamed, Fleming, Stephen M·2020·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A core feature of human cognition is an ability to separate private states of mind - what we think or believe - from public actions - what we say or do. This ability is central to successful social interaction - with different social contexts often requiring different mappings between private states and public actions in order to minimise conflict and facilitate communication. Here we investigated how the human brain supports private-public mappings, using an interactive task which required subjects to adapt how they communicated their confidence about a perceptual decision to the social context. Univariate and multivariate analysis of fMRI data revealed that a private-public distinction is reflected in a medial-lateral division of prefrontal cortex - with lateral frontal pole (FPl) supporting the context-dependent mapping from a private sense of confidence to a public report. The concept of private-public mappings provides a promising framework for understanding flexible social behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.56477

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an fMRI study of social coordination about random dot motion judgments, vmPFC (specifically pgACC) covaried with private estimates of propositional confidence, whereas lateral frontopolar cortex carried information about the extent to which a private-public mapping should be adjusted when communicating a public judgment.

    “In an fMRI study of such social coordination about random dot motion judgments, it was found that whereas vmPFC (specifically, pgACC) covaried with private estimates of propositional confidence, as found in previous work, lateral frontopolar cortex additionally carried information about the extent to which a private-public mapping should be adjusted when communicating a public judgment (Bang et al”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Bang et al. 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Josephs O Howseman AM Friston KJ Turner R 1997 Physiological noise modelling for multi-slice EPI fMRI using SPM Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of ISMRM

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bang, D., Ershadmanesh, S., Nili, H., & Fleming, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IR)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Bang, Dan
Venue
eLife
Published
2020-07-23
Volume
9
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044389258
Cited by
40
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome (213630/Z/18/Z, 206648/Z/17/Z)
  • Royal Society (206648/Z/17/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, perceptual decision making, social environment, social cognition, metacognition
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review