The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Magical Mystery Four: How Is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?
Open accessAbstract
Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed. The ability to repeat information depends on task demands but can be distinguished from a more constant, underlying mechanism: a central memory store limited to 3 to 5 meaningful items for young adults. I discuss why this central limit is important, how it can be observed, how it differs among individuals, and why it may exist.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cowan argues that working memory has a central storage limit of about 3–5 meaningful items or chunks in young adults, observable when rehearsal, grouping, and sensory memory are controlled. The limit predicts thought and individual differences, but its underlying reasons remain unresolved.
Key findings
- A central working memory store is limited to about 3–5 chunks in young adults; in running span, only the last 3–5 digits can be recalled, and with rehearsal prevented individuals remembered only about 3 units whether items were singletons or learned pairs.
- In a dual-modality array task, people remembered about 4 squares when attending only to squares; when attending to both squares and spoken digits, they remembered fewer squares but about 4 items in all, but only when a mask wiped out sensory memory.
- Age differences appeared in storage: 7-year-olds stored about 1.5 items versus about 3.0 for older children or adults; the attention advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults when the total field was small (4 items).
- Proposed explanations split into capacity limits as weaknesses (neural timing, interference, or neuron limits) versus strengths (efficient search, chunking, and learning imperfect rules).
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis of prior behavioral studies; no new primary experiment is reported.
- Describes tasks including running span, brief simultaneous spatial arrays, unattended auditory input, articulatory suppression, paired-word chunk learning, and visual/auditory dual arrays with masks and attention conditions.
- Capacity was estimated using a hit/false-alarm formula (Cowan, 2001), with comparisons across age, attention, modality, and chunk type.
Limitations
- Stated: the reasons for the central 3–5 chunk limit remain unclear; the hypotheses are not necessarily incompatible; and precise predictions cannot yet be made for every possible task.
- Stated: some key cited results were in press at the time (e.g., Chen & Cowan; Cowan et al.), limiting available detail.
- Evident: as a review, the conclusions depend on selected prior studies and task-specific controls, with no formal meta-analysis or new data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
25 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 3 Own result
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan et al., in press
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when verbal rehearsal was prevented by having the participant repeat the word “the” throughout the trial, individuals remembered only about 3 units, no matter whether those were singletons or learned pairs.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen and Cowan (in press)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young adults can recall 3 to 5 chunks from a presented list no matter whether these are learned pairs or singletons.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults, provided that the total number of items in the field was small (4).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundary conditions are also of practical use to predict performance when the material is too brief, long, or complex to allow processing strategies such as rehearsal or grouping.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This fixed capacity limit was obtained, though, only if the items to be recalled were followed by a jumble of meaningless, mixed visual and acoustic stimuli (a mask) so that sensory memory would be wiped out and the measure of working memory would be limited to central memory.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tests of working memory demonstrate practical limits that vary, depending on whether the test circumstances allow processes such as grouping or rehearsal, focusing of attention on just the material relevant to the task, and the use of modality- or material-specific stores to supplement a central store.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies indicate that working memory capacity varies among people, predicts individual differences in intellectual ability, and changes across the life span (Cowan, 2005).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Working memory is used in mental tasks, such as language comprehension (for example, retaining ideas from early in a sentence to be combined with ideas later on), problem solving (in arithmetic, carrying a digit from the ones to the tens column while remembering the numbers), and planning (determining the best order in which to visit the bank, library, and grocery).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was also an advantage for the test of the shape to be remembered, compared to the shape to be ignored; attention helped greatly.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage-specific capacity is a more analytic concept and stays constant across a much wider variety of circumstances.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some ways, the existing limits may be ideal, or nearly so, for humans.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are probably factors of biological economy limiting central capacity”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The reasons for the central working memory storage limit of 3–5 chunks remain unclear but Cowan (2005) reviewed a variety of hypotheses.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > WHY THE STORAGE CAPACITY LIMIT?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“if they were asked to attend to both squares and digits, they could remember fewer squares, but about 4 items in all.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That central memory is especially important because it underlies problem-solving and abstract thought.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Other work suggests that storage and processing capacities both make important, partly separate and partly overlapping contributions to intelligence and development (Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recall limit is important because it measures what is termed working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960), the few temporarily active thoughts.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“He demonstrated that one can repeat back a list of no more than about seven randomly ordered, meaningful items or chunks”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller (1956)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.
“Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, the limited processing capacity of a learner's working memory (WM) is considered a bottleneck (Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956); for new, yet to be learned information, its processing capacity is limited to only 4±1 elements (Cowan 2010)”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Cowan 2010
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Self-citationPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Brown, R. W. (1960) · Language · doi:10.2307/411065 · Cited by 3,525
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
Baddeley, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · Cited by 2,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04171 · Cited by 1,367
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 977
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
Enhancing Multiple Object Analysis Skills Across Early and Late Adulthood Through Diverse Tasks
Tagliabue, C. F., Fornari, C., Varesio, G., & Mazza, V. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Enhancement · doi:10.1007/s41465-024-00295-0 · Cited by 1
Schmid, L., & Hardieß, G. (2024) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.24.8.2 · Cited by 1
Understanding Color Interaction Effects in Accommodation Listing Images
Barnes, S. J. (2024) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875241301717 · Cited by 1
The Controversy About Risks and Threats in Artificial Intelligence
Kreissl, R., & von Laufenberg, R. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-45708-2_9 · Cited by 1
Less can be More: Effects of a Forgetting Function on an AI-based Policy Capturing Tool Performance
Lavoie-Hudon, L., Bureau, C., Lafond, D., & Tremblay, S. (2025) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813251358264 · Cited by 1
What is the level of precision of phonological representations in working memory?
Bouffier, M., Remouchamps, R., & Majerus, S. (2025) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01768-z · Cited by 1
Cheung, H. C. K. C. K., Zhong, L. S., Wall, S. L., & Lisk, K. (2025) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.70150 · Cited by 1
Wyzwania branży pieczarkarskiej w Polsce oraz jej rozwój przez badania i innowacje
Sakson, N., & Hreczuch, W. (2025) · Annales Horticulturae · doi:10.24326/ah.2025.5567 · Cited by 1
COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS OF CHILDREN IN GRADES 5-8 – CASE STUDY
Telejko, M., Zender-Świercz, E. J., Galiszewska, B., & Wojcieszak, R. (2025) · Structure and Environment · doi:10.30540/sae-2025-014 · Cited by 1
The role of working memory for learning with context-personalized tasks in elementary school
Laufs, A.-K., Meyer, A., Krüger, M., & Kempert, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1671810 · Cited by 1
Identifying the necessary conditions for large populations to enhance cumulative culture
Walker, B., & Fay, N. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-40973-x · Cited by 1
Virtual Reality in Education: A Stratified Meta-Analysis of Experimental Rigor and Bias
Layadi, S., Huguet, P., Pavic, K., & Chevalère, J. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10130-x · Cited by 2
Human Factors for Pilots and Aviation Specialists
Kapela, A. (2026) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003515418 · Cited by 1
Senja, Q. S., Shan, W., Ma, X., Yi, Q., & Yan, H. (2026) · Life · doi:10.3390/life16050836 · Cited by 1
Dai, S., & Peng, X. (2026) · The Educational Review USA · doi:10.26855/er.2026.03.006 · Cited by 1
Good things come in threes: evaluating clinical utility of machine learning-derived clusters
Lisik, D., de Kok, J. W. T. M., Barón, N. B., Vanfleteren, L. E. G. W., Nwaru, B. I., & Basna, R. (2026) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag098 · Cited by 1
Ekizer, F. N., & Asma, B. (2026) · Hacettepe University Journal of Education · doi:10.16986/hunefd.1755298 · Cited by 1
Zhang, T. (2026) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2026.102322 · Cited by 1
Capacity limits in oscillatory networks: Implications for sensory coding
Rao, A. R., & Cecchi, G. (2013) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2013.6706847 · Cited by 1
Automaticity and Unconsciousness: What Are They and What’s the Difference?
Wasserman, T. H., & Wasserman, L. D. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30910-1_8 · Cited by 1
Richardson, J. C., & Kozan, K. (2016) · Educational media and technology yearbook · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45001-8_6 · Cited by 1
Simultanagnosia does not affect processes of auditory Gestalt perception
Rennig, J., Bleyer, A. L., & Karnath, H. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.026 · Cited by 1
Development and Applications of the Capacity Function that also Measures Accuracy
Altieri, N. A. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804315-8.00006-9 · Cited by 1
Tradução de teste de capacidade de memória de trabalho do inglês para o português brasileiro
Rigatti, P. C., Fontes, A. B. A. D. L., Magagnin, K. P., & Finger, I. (2018) · Letrônica · doi:10.15448/1984-4301.2017.2.26434 · Cited by 1
“Fear” Is a Book of Fiction Mixed with Real Events
Paniagua, F. A. (2018) · Open Journal of Political Science · doi:10.4236/ojps.2019.91006 · Cited by 1
The Effect of Users’ Working Memory on Preference and Performance in Authentication Mechanisms
Belk, M., Fidas, C. A., Germanakos, P., & Samaras, G. (2012) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2012.62 · Cited by 1
Embracing cognitive factors and fuzzy logic in adaptive interactive systems
Papatheocharous, E. (2013) · International Journal of Engineering · Cited by 1
Krist, S., Noll, K., Pick, R., Pielstick, A., Sayeed, S., Schmid, L., & Schneider, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45062-8_5 · Cited by 1
Wei, H., Jin, X., & Su, Z. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12050547 · Cited by 1
Young, J. (2022) · Time and Mind · doi:10.1080/1751696x.2022.2103727 · Cited by 2
Hiraoka, K., Kodama, K., Tani, E., Tatsumi, M., & Tomoi, T. (2023) · Somatosensory & Motor Research · doi:10.1080/08990220.2023.2173166 · Cited by 1
Zhang, Y. (2023) · Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.54097/ehss.v8i.4678 · Cited by 2
Distributional Prototypical Methods for Reliable Explanation Space Construction
Joo, H., Kim, J., Han, H., & Lee, J. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3264794 · Cited by 1
Towards Measuring the Cognitive Loads of Different Dialog Acts through Dependency Distance
Qi, D., & Liu, H. (2022) · International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval (NLPIR) · doi:10.1145/3582768.3582775 · Cited by 1
Interference causes forgetting relevant information while driving much more strongly than decay
Baur, L., & Vollrath, M. (2023) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2023.07.013 · Cited by 1
Hosseini, S. M., & Papoli, A. F. (2023) · German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research · doi:10.1007/s12662-023-00898-3 · Cited by 1
Palmiotto, A., Winburn, A. P., Pink, C., Brown, C. A., & LeGarde, C. B. (2023) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2023.12.004 · Cited by 1
Tan, A. S. L., Lau, R. C., Anderson, P. J., Gathercole, S. E., Bellgrove, M. A., Wiley, J. F., & Spencer‐Smith, M. M. (2024) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.348 · Cited by 2
Risiken und Gefahren der ‚Künstlichen‘ ‚Intelligenz‘
Kreissl, R., & von Laufenberg, R. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-43521-9_10 · Cited by 1
Slavuljica, A., Bektaş, K., Strecker, J. R., & Mayer, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3655599 · Cited by 1
Individuelles Lernen beim Arbeiten
Hacker, W., & Pohlandt, A. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s41449-024-00442-5 · Cited by 1
Artistry in Scientific Writing
Wang, C. S., & Chung, K. C. (2024) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000011555 · Cited by 1
The Impact of Modern Technology on Photographic Memory: Evidence from African Rural University
Chrispo, M. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24oct1717 · Cited by 1
Sporda Bilişsel Esneklik Kavramının Değerlendirilmesi
Aksoy, S., & ÖZDAYI, N. (2024) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub636.c2752 · Cited by 1
González, K. N., Espinosa-Otalora, G., Goñi, J., & Naranjo-M, F. (2025) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2025.130363 · Cited by 1
Thematic World Maps in the News: How Effective are They on Smartphones?
Oesch, J., Schöttler, S., Kelén, J., & Çöltekin, A. (2025) · The Cartographic Journal · doi:10.1080/00087041.2024.2447628 · Cited by 1
席, 尊. (2025) · Advances in Education · doi:10.12677/ae.2025.1591746 · Cited by 1
Good Newbie or Poor Newbie? Determinants of Video Game Skill Acquisition at an Early Stage
Koban, K., Liebold, B., & Ohler, P. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_57 · Cited by 1
Emergence of active consciousness in working memory
Osaka, N. (2016) · Transactions of the Japan Academy · doi:10.2183/tja.70.3_135 · Cited by 1
The Significance Of The Low Complexity Dimension In Music Similarity Judgements.
Ens, J., Riecke, B. E., & Pasquier, P. (2017) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1416399 · Cited by 1
PassHue: Introducing Analog Authentication
Gurary, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91238-7_42 · Cited by 1
Korean wh-Island Sentences: Individual Differences in Acceptability Judgments and Working Memory
Hahn, H.-R. (2019) · 어학연구 · doi:10.30961/lr.2019.55.2.379 · Cited by 1
Zhigulina, P. E., Ushakov, V., Kartashov, S., Malakhov, D. G., Orlov, V. A., Novikov, K., Короткова, А. Ю., Anokhin, K. V., & Nourkova, V. V. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.164 · Cited by 1
Lasaponara, S., Pinto, M., PELLEGRINO, M. A., Caratelli, L., Rossi‐Arnaud, C., Cestari, V., Costanzi, M., & Doricchi, F. (2020) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-020-05862-3 · Cited by 1
New Understandings of Instructional Theory: Finding the Instructional ‘Sweet Spot’
Bentley, B. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6667-7_6 · Cited by 1
Roos, B. H., & Schreck, J. S. (2021) · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups · doi:10.1044/2021_persp-21-00008 · Cited by 1
Ullrich, & Nicholas, J. (2021) · Cited by 1
STM-GOMS Model: A Security Model for Authentication Schemes in Mobile Smart Device Environments *
Shin, S., & Kwon, T. (2012) · 정보보호학회논문지 · Cited by 1
Bawa, P. (2021) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3710-0.ch044 · Cited by 1
Norme esthétique, norme psycholinguistique : le cas de la Tmèse
Watine, M.-A. (2017) · Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.pufc.37627 · Cited by 1
Working Memory Performance for Differentially Conditioned Stimuli
Ward, R. T., Lotfi, S., Stout, D. M., Mattson, S., Lee, H., & Larson, C. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.811233 · Cited by 1
Becker‐Carus, C., & Wendt, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53006-1_8 · Cited by 1
Ce que le cerveau n’a pas dans la tête. Socialisation, histoire et cognition
Millet, M. (2022) · Socio-logos · doi:10.4000/socio-logos.5409 · Cited by 1
Roussel, S. (2021) · Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité · doi:10.4000/apliut.8422 · Cited by 1
Branaghan, R. J., O’Brian, J. S., Hildebrand, E. A., & Foster, L. B. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64433-8_7 · Cited by 1
Algorithmic Cognition and the Computational Nature of the Mind
Zenil, H., & Gauvrit, N. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6883-1_707 · Cited by 1
Clinical Ambiguity in the Intelligent Machine Era (Treats Breaks and Discharges)
Miller, D. D. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04935-4_20 · Cited by 1
Why mind mapping is a vital software tool for the modern worker?
Guerrero, J. M. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820119-0.00005-4 · Cited by 1
Zani, I. A. I., Hamid, A. I. A., & Senik, M. H. (2023) · Neuroscience Research Notes · doi:10.31117/neuroscirn.v6i1.179 · Cited by 1
A Human Factors Evaluation of the Space Shuttle Cockpit Avionics Upgrade
Westenhaver, M. S. (2012) · Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School) · Cited by 1
Exploring the relationship between working memory deficits and reading difficulties
Vaagen, N. (2015) · University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · Cited by 1
Effects of observing and producing deictic gestures on memory and learning in different age groups
Ouwehand, K. (2016) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 1
Accessing the mind: relating metacognition to attention, memory, and cognitive function
Matthews, J. (2019) · Figshare · doi:10.26180/5c5a1486c5372 · Cited by 1
Kirk, P. A., Robinson, O. J., & Gilbert, S. J. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/m6twq · Cited by 1
Sinanan, R. (2022) · Digital Commons - Andrews University (Andrews University) · doi:10.32597/dissertations/1774/ · Cited by 1
Formica, S., Palenciano, A. F., Vermeylen, L., Myers, N. E., Braß, M., & González‐García, C. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/87djt · Cited by 1
Burgoyne, A. P., Frank, D. J., & Macnamara, B. N. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02721-6 · Cited by 1
Kinosada, Y., Furukawa, Y., Wakai, T., & Nakashima, K. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vnfdx_v2 · Cited by 1
Aha! under pressure: Is the Aha! experience constrained by cognitive loadPreprint
Stuyck, H., Axel Cleeremans, B., & den Bussche, E. V. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ty6cn · Cited by 1
The "Physics of Diagrams": Revealing the scientific basis of graphical representation designPreprint
Pissierssens, S., Claes, J., & Poels, G. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.05941 · Cited by 1
Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Differentiating Between ?If?, ?What? and ?When? Outcomes Occur
Blackburn, M. (2012) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 1
Utforskning av en ny metode for presentasjon av subliminale stimuli og dens effekt på holdninger
Nordahl, D., & Lindgård, T. (2012) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Cognitive Processes in Craving: From the Laboratory to the Real World.
Skorka-Brown, J. (2015) · PEARL (University of Plymouth) · doi:10.24382/3887
Mamun, A. A. (2015) · Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology)
Beaulac, G. (2014) · Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Development of a Child Abuse Level Management (CALM) Guide for Research with Young Children
Lewin, L. C., & Schim, S. M. (2015) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2015.10.001
Assessing Capacity and Control of Visual Working Memory
Magnotti, J. F. (2012)
Speech in noise ability, outer hair cell function, and working memory for trained flute players.
Caldwell, K. A. (2015) · ProQuest Demo Repository
Individual Differences in Cognitive Strategy During Reactive Task-Set Switching
Martini, M. C., González, C. A., & Youmans, R. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931214581212
Perceptual Discriminability in Conceptual Modeling
Stark, J. (2016) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39567-8_7
The Symbolism as a Cheap Channel Code: The Symbolic Language’s Role in Cognition
Teixeira, M. H. D. S. (2016) · Psychology and Cognitive Sciences - Open Journal · doi:10.17140/pcsoj-2-109
Encoding sex ratio information: automatic or effortful?
Dillon, H. (2015) · K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University)
Out with the old? The role of selective attention in retaining targets in partial report
Lindsey, D. R. B., Bundesen, C., Kyllingsbæk, S., Petersen, A., & Logan, G. D. (2016) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1214-4
Prior knowledge and age effects in memory:Implications for episodic and short-term/immediate memory
Daniel, L. C. (2015) · City Research Online (City University London)
Understanding flow and chunking constructs in self service technologies
Esterhuyse, J. (2013) · UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)
Leveraging attention focus for effective reinforcement learning in complex domains
Rus, C., & Carlos, L. (2013) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology)
Perceptions of effort and risk assessment
Vangsness, L. (2017) · K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University)
Alyami, M. M., Alyami, H., Sundram, F., & Haarhoff, B. (2017) · ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · doi:10.12691/education-5-6-2
Lim, D., & Ro, Y. (2015) · Audiology and Speech Research · doi:10.21848/audiol.2015.11.3.233
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowan, Nelson
- ORCID
- Cowan, Nelson
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2864034
- OpenAlex
- W2134598164
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f52d0f7bdb639a9ea900f7d1fecb39468358b00
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021338)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, storage capacity, short-term memory, individual differences, memory span
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
