The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Magical Mystery Four: How Is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?
Open accessAbstract
Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed. The ability to repeat information depends on task demands but can be distinguished from a more constant, underlying mechanism: a central memory store limited to 3 to 5 meaningful items for young adults. I discuss why this central limit is important, how it can be observed, how it differs among individuals, and why it may exist.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cowan argues that working memory has a central storage limit of about 3–5 meaningful items or chunks in young adults, observable when rehearsal, grouping, and sensory memory are controlled. The limit predicts thought and individual differences, but its underlying reasons remain unresolved.
Key findings
- A central working memory store is limited to about 3–5 chunks in young adults; in running span, only the last 3–5 digits can be recalled, and with rehearsal prevented individuals remembered only about 3 units whether items were singletons or learned pairs.
- In a dual-modality array task, people remembered about 4 squares when attending only to squares; when attending to both squares and spoken digits, they remembered fewer squares but about 4 items in all, but only when a mask wiped out sensory memory.
- Age differences appeared in storage: 7-year-olds stored about 1.5 items versus about 3.0 for older children or adults; the attention advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults when the total field was small (4 items).
- Proposed explanations split into capacity limits as weaknesses (neural timing, interference, or neuron limits) versus strengths (efficient search, chunking, and learning imperfect rules).
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis of prior behavioral studies; no new primary experiment is reported.
- Describes tasks including running span, brief simultaneous spatial arrays, unattended auditory input, articulatory suppression, paired-word chunk learning, and visual/auditory dual arrays with masks and attention conditions.
- Capacity was estimated using a hit/false-alarm formula (Cowan, 2001), with comparisons across age, attention, modality, and chunk type.
Limitations
- Stated: the reasons for the central 3–5 chunk limit remain unclear; the hypotheses are not necessarily incompatible; and precise predictions cannot yet be made for every possible task.
- Stated: some key cited results were in press at the time (e.g., Chen & Cowan; Cowan et al.), limiting available detail.
- Evident: as a review, the conclusions depend on selected prior studies and task-specific controls, with no formal meta-analysis or new data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
25 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 3 Own result
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan et al., in press
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when verbal rehearsal was prevented by having the participant repeat the word “the” throughout the trial, individuals remembered only about 3 units, no matter whether those were singletons or learned pairs.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen and Cowan (in press)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young adults can recall 3 to 5 chunks from a presented list no matter whether these are learned pairs or singletons.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults, provided that the total number of items in the field was small (4).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundary conditions are also of practical use to predict performance when the material is too brief, long, or complex to allow processing strategies such as rehearsal or grouping.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This fixed capacity limit was obtained, though, only if the items to be recalled were followed by a jumble of meaningless, mixed visual and acoustic stimuli (a mask) so that sensory memory would be wiped out and the measure of working memory would be limited to central memory.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tests of working memory demonstrate practical limits that vary, depending on whether the test circumstances allow processes such as grouping or rehearsal, focusing of attention on just the material relevant to the task, and the use of modality- or material-specific stores to supplement a central store.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies indicate that working memory capacity varies among people, predicts individual differences in intellectual ability, and changes across the life span (Cowan, 2005).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Working memory is used in mental tasks, such as language comprehension (for example, retaining ideas from early in a sentence to be combined with ideas later on), problem solving (in arithmetic, carrying a digit from the ones to the tens column while remembering the numbers), and planning (determining the best order in which to visit the bank, library, and grocery).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was also an advantage for the test of the shape to be remembered, compared to the shape to be ignored; attention helped greatly.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage-specific capacity is a more analytic concept and stays constant across a much wider variety of circumstances.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some ways, the existing limits may be ideal, or nearly so, for humans.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are probably factors of biological economy limiting central capacity”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The reasons for the central working memory storage limit of 3–5 chunks remain unclear but Cowan (2005) reviewed a variety of hypotheses.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > WHY THE STORAGE CAPACITY LIMIT?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“if they were asked to attend to both squares and digits, they could remember fewer squares, but about 4 items in all.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That central memory is especially important because it underlies problem-solving and abstract thought.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Other work suggests that storage and processing capacities both make important, partly separate and partly overlapping contributions to intelligence and development (Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recall limit is important because it measures what is termed working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960), the few temporarily active thoughts.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“He demonstrated that one can repeat back a list of no more than about seven randomly ordered, meaningful items or chunks”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller (1956)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.
“Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, the limited processing capacity of a learner's working memory (WM) is considered a bottleneck (Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956); for new, yet to be learned information, its processing capacity is limited to only 4±1 elements (Cowan 2010)”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Cowan 2010
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Self-citationPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Brown, R. W. (1960) · Language · doi:10.2307/411065 · Cited by 3,525
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
Baddeley, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · Cited by 2,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04171 · Cited by 1,367
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 977
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,000
Developing a General Construal Questionnaire
Yin, Y., Barrett, R., Williams, M., Wiesenfeld, B. M., & Wakslak, C. J. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251321318 · Cited by 4
Wendt, C., & Hesselmann, G. (2025) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103900 · Cited by 4
A pilot comparison of the retention rates of FAST and BEFAST stroke warning-sign mnemonics
Guo, S., & Saver, J. L. (2025) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1624800 · Cited by 4
Linking motor working memory to explicit and implicit motor learning
Hillman, H., McClure, T., & McDougle, S. D. (2025) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00105.2025 · Cited by 4
Decoding Auditory Working Memory Load From EEG Alpha Oscillations
Yuan, Y., Gayet, S., Wisman, D. C., der Stigchel, S. V., & der Stoep, N. V. (2025) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.70210 · Cited by 4
Shared Minds: The Cognitive Parallels Between Humans and Artificial Intelligence
Tremblay, S., Marois, A., Zare, M., & Lafond, D. (2026) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/9946143 · Cited by 5
A Cognitive Load Perspective to Instructional Design for Online Learning
Dönmez, O. (2021) · Advances in mobile and distance learning book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8701-0.ch019 · Cited by 4
Tsuji, T., Nagata, K., Sasaki, K., Matsukane, R., Ishida, S., Kawashiri, T., Suetsugu, K., Watanabe, H., Hirota, T., & Ieiri, I. (2022) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences · doi:10.1186/s40780-022-00254-x · Cited by 4
Report on Smart Education in Hungary
Molnár, G., & Csapó, B. (2023) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-7319-2_7 · Cited by 4
Lee, C. (2023) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/10870547231161527 · Cited by 5
Training semantic long-term memory retrieval transfers to executive function and reading fluency
Haobo, Z., Henderson, L. M., Ji, X., Zhang, Q., Bin, Z., Xiangtao, H., Ren, M., & Ma, X. (2024) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108789 · Cited by 4
Cognitive Function of Climbers: An Exploratory Study of Working Memory and Climbing Performance
Garrido-Palomino, I., Giles, D., Fryer, S. M., Montesinos, J. L. G., & España‐Romero, V. (2024) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2024.25 · Cited by 4
MemFusionMap: Working Memory Fusion for Online Vectorized HD Map Construction
Song, J., Chen, X., Lu, L., Li, J., & Skinner, K. A. (2025) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00896 · Cited by 4
Random Tree Model of Meaningful Memory
Zhong, W., Can, T., Georgiou, A., Shnayderman, I., Katkov, M., & Tsodyks, M. V. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/g1cz-wk1l · Cited by 4
Potential antecedents and consequences of online confusion in tourism industry
Ranjbarian, B., Abdollahi, S. M., & Ghorbani, H. (2016) · International Conference on e-Commerce in Developing Countries: with focus on e-Tourism (ECDC) · doi:10.1109/ecdc.2016.7492984 · Cited by 4
Structural phase transitions in isotropic magnetic elastomers
Meilikhov, E. Z., & Farzetdinova, R. M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1134/s1063776116060170 · Cited by 4
Syntactic Hierarchy Depth: Distribution, Interrelation and Cross-Linguistic Properties
Yang, J. (2018) · Journal of Quantitative Linguistics · doi:10.1080/09296174.2018.1453962 · Cited by 4
High Working Memory Capacity at the Cost of Precision?
Vellage, A., Müller, P., Schmicker, M., Hopf, J., & Müller, N. G. (2019) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci9090210 · Cited by 4
Persistence and Accumulation of Visual Memories for Objects in Scenes in 12-Month-Old Infants
Guillory, S. B., & Káldy, Z. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02454 · Cited by 4
Wilbiks, J. M. P., Pavilanis, A. D. S., & Rioux, D. M. (2020) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01882-6 · Cited by 5
Training and transfer effects of long-term memory retrieval training
Ma, X., Zhang, H., Zhao, X., & Zhou, A. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2020.1814306 · Cited by 4
Priority setting: Consensus for Australia's infant safe sleeping public health promotion programme
Cole, R., Young, J., Kearney, L. N., & Thompson, J. (2020) · Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health · doi:10.1111/jpc.15178 · Cited by 4
Collister, L., & Cantrell, M. (2021) · Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication · doi:10.7710/2162-3309.2395 · Cited by 4
Complexity in insurance selection: Cross-classified multilevel analysis of experimental data
Beşliu, C. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100713 · Cited by 4
Barch, D. M., Boudewyn, M. A., Carter, C. S., Erickson, M. A., Frank, M. J., Gold, J. M., Luck, S. J., MacDonald, A. W., Ragland, J. D., Ranganath, C., et al. (2022) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2022_391 · Cited by 4
Looney, L., Wong, E. H., Rosales, K. P., Rosales, F., & Tirado, G. (2022) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/01430343221122454 · Cited by 4
Working memory capacity: the role of parameters of spiking neural network model
Kovaleva, N., Matrosov, V., & Mishchenko, M. A. (2023) · Izvestiya VUZ Applied Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.18500/0869-6632-003022 · Cited by 4
Units of Translation and the Limited Capacity of Working Memory
Ruiz, M. N., & Ospina, D. L. G. (2023) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1001996 · Cited by 4
The role of brain oscillations in feature integration
Cobos, M. I., Melcón, M., Esteban, P. R.-S., Capilla, A., & Chica, A. B. (2023) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14467 · Cited by 4
Wang, S., Wong, L. L. N., & Chen, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992027.2024.2305685 · Cited by 4
Boness, C. L., Stevens, J. E., Steinley, D., Trull, T. J., & Sher, K. J. (2018) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000249 · Cited by 4
A Case Study of Peer Instruction
Porter, L., & Simon, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.031 · Cited by 4
Distinct Neural Processes for Memorizing Form and Meaning Within Sentences
Mascelloni, M., Zamparelli, R., Vespignani, F., Gruber, T., & Mueller, J. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00412 · Cited by 4
Hood, J., Graber, C., & Brase, G. L. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02986 · Cited by 4
Does conflict resolution rely on working memory?
Moss, M. E., Kikumoto, A., & Mayr, U. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000801 · Cited by 4
Superimposed Text Size and Contrast Effects in DTC TV Advertising
Paquin, R. S., O’Donoghue, A. C., Kelly, B., Betts, K. R., Johnson, M., Davis, C. N., Jordan, A. M., & Williams, P. N. (2020) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2020-021 · Cited by 4
Arbeitsgestaltung als Informationsmanagement
Hacker, W. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s41449-020-00229-4 · Cited by 4
Romine, W. L., Schroeder, N. L., Edwards, A., & Banerjee, T. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68790-8_8 · Cited by 4
Current Movement Follows Previous Nontarget Movement With Somatosensory Stimulation
Oda, H., Sawaguchi, Y., Kunimura, H., Kawasaki, T., & Hiraoka, K. (2021) · Motor Control · doi:10.1123/mc.2020-0057 · Cited by 4
Simulations of working memory spiking networks driven by short-term plasticity
Tiddia, G., Golosio, B., Fanti, V., & Paolucci, P. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2022.972055 · Cited by 4
Teichroeb, J. A., Smeltzer, E. A., Mathur, V., Anderson, K. A., Fowler, E. J., Adams, F. V., Vasey, E. N., Kumpan, L. T., Stead, S. M., & Arseneau‐Robar, T. J. M. (2023) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.23565 · Cited by 5
Halterman, T. (2013) · USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco) · Cited by 4
Vieillissement de la population active
Levasseur, S. (2015) · Revue de l'OFCE/La Revue de l'OFCE · doi:10.3917/reof.142.0339 · Cited by 6
Improving worker productivity in advanced manufacturing environments
Gleeson, F., Goodman, L., Hargaden, V., & Coughlan, P. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) · doi:10.1109/ice.2017.8279902 · Cited by 4
Tripp, J. F. (2019) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68837-4_5 · Cited by 4
A survey on Information Visualization in light of Vision and Cognitive sciencesPreprint
Junior, J. F. R., Zaina, L. A. M., de Oliveira, M. C. F., & Traina, A. J. M. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Algorithms at the Bedside: Moving Past Development and Validation*
Fackler, J. C., Ghobadi, K., & Gürses, A. P. (2024) · Pediatric Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000003437 · Cited by 4
An investigation of the diachronic trend of dependency distance minimization in magazines and news
Zhang, R., & Zhou, G. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279836 · Cited by 3
Hearing fearful prosody impairs visual working memory maintenance
Thiffault, F., Cinq-Mars, J., Brisson, B., & Blanchette, I. (2024) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112338 · Cited by 3
Raz, S., & Breitkopf, D. (2024) · Global Journal of Ecology · doi:10.17352/gje.000106 · Cited by 3
Forsberg, A., Belletier, C., Graham, A. J., Rhodes, S., Barrouillet, P., Camos, V., Cowan, N., Naveh‐Benjamin, M., & Logie, R. H. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218251351307 · Cited by 3
Self-citationUnexpected higher resilience to distraction during visual working memory in schizophrenia
Zhang, R., Zhao, Y.-J., Zhang, L., Ran, X., Ji, C., & Ku, Y. (2025) · Schizophrenia · doi:10.1038/s41537-025-00631-z · Cited by 3
D'Angiò, M., Chiarella, S. G., Simione, L., Pace, E. D., van Leeuwen, C., & Raffone, A. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106445 · Cited by 3
Virtual Characters Help K–12 Students Learn and Improve Motivation: A Meta-Analysis
Schroeder, N. L., Zhang, S., Jaldi, C. D., Gladstone, J. R., López, A. A., & Dorley, E. (2025) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543251389930 · Cited by 3
Counting on automatization: The automatized counting theory of mental arithmetic
Prado, J., & Thévenot, C. (2026) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2026.101252 · Cited by 3
Multi-Level Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Human-Centered AI
Schoenherr, J. R., & Michael, K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3658-0_100 · Cited by 3
The Level of Passive Voice Comprehension in the 4–5 Years Old Russian Children Reflects in the ERP’s
Kruchinina, O. V., Петровна, С. Е., Guillemard, D., & Galperina, E. I. (2022) · Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1134/s0022093022020089 · Cited by 3
Lee, K., Choi, S., Choi, S., & Kim, D. (2022) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2022.23.5.861 · Cited by 3
Dijkstra, A., & Bodamer, W. G. (2023) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12672 · Cited by 3
New perspective of stress on the design characteristics of office indoor restorative environments
Xuan, X., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108602 · Cited by 3
What insights can response times provide for education research?
Bélanger, É., Foisy, L. B., & Masson, S. (2024) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2024.2336146 · Cited by 3
Imad, M., Bitanihirwe, B. K. Y., & Barranco, K. (2024) · ADVANCE Journal · doi:10.5399/osu/advjrnl.5.1.2 · Cited by 3
Feleus, S., Vo, M.-L. T. D., Kuijper, L. C. M., Roos, R. A. C., & de Bot, S. T. (2024) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-024-12728-z · Cited by 3
Singh, N. N. (2025) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-024-02508-1 · Cited by 3
Does the experimenter presence impact children’s working memory?
Camos, V., Elsig, S. M., Öncü, Y., Wohlhauser, M., & Belletier, C. (2025) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2025.101569 · Cited by 3
Flexible working memory model with two types of plasticity
Kovaleva, N. S., Matrosov, V. V., Lobov, S. A., & Mishchenko, M. A. (2025) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01585-0 · Cited by 3
Kuhbandner, C., & Mayrhofer, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1397553 · Cited by 3
Does overnight memory consolidation support next-day learning?
Guttesen, A. Á. V., Harrington, M. O., Gaskell, M. G., & Cairney, S. A. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106241 · Cited by 3
Segundo, J., Flórez‐López, R., Elorza, M. L. V., & Sánchez, J. M. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103025 · Cited by 3
Frogner, E. R., Dahl, A., Kjelkenes, R., Moberget, T., Collins, A. G. E., Westlye, L. T., & Pedersen, M. L. (2025) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101626 · Cited by 3
Ouwehand, K., van Gog, T., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0611-1 · Cited by 3
Yamamoto, U., Mashima, N., & Hiroyasu, T. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Enhancement · doi:10.1007/s41465-017-0063-y · Cited by 3
Common Principles in Learning from Bees through to Humans
Dyer, A. G., García, J. E., Howard, S. R., Avarguès‐Weber, A., & Greentree, A. D. (2019) · Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy · doi:10.1163/23644583-00401014 · Cited by 3
Working memory and handwriting and share a common resource: An investigation of shared attention
Tindle, R., & Longstaff, M. G. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01733-4 · Cited by 3
Pooling it all together – the role of distractor pool size on stimulus-response binding
Schmalbrock, P., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2022.2026363 · Cited by 3
Is Early Bilingual Experience Associated with Greater Fluid Intelligence in Adults?
D’Souza, D., & Dakhch, Y. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7020100 · Cited by 5
File, D., Petró, B., Gaál, Z. A., Csikós, N., & Czigler, I. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.975714 · Cited by 3
Tagliabue, C. F., Varesio, G., & Mazza, V. (2022) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-022-02580-6 · Cited by 3
Measuring Cognitive Loads while Learning Computational Statistics
Quintero-Manes, R., Vieira, C., & Hernandez-Vargas, N. (2022) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie56618.2022.9962606 · Cited by 3
Tait, I., Wang, Z., O’Leary, T., & Corballis, P. M. (2022) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness · doi:10.1142/s2705078522300018 · Cited by 4
Zhao, S., Zhou, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, D. (2023) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0373-22.2023 · Cited by 3
Yue, W. L., Ng, K. K., Liu, S., Qian, X., Chong, J. S. X., Koh, A. J., Ong, M. Q. W., Ting, S. K. S., Ng, A. S. L., Kandiah, N., et al. (2024) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00358 · Cited by 3
Orthographic Learning in French-Speaking Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children
Sabatier, E., Leybaert, J., & Chetail, F. (2024) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00324 · Cited by 3
Conte, N., Pelegrina, S., Padulo, C., Marascia, E., & Fairfield, B. (2024) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-024-01929-w · Cited by 3
Deriving inferences through natural language from structured datasets for asset lifecycle management
Sanchit, Bhattacharjee, S., & Pandhare, V. (2024) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.064 · Cited by 3
Wang, S., Liu, B., Feng, Y., & Meng, L. (2024) · Cartography and Geographic Information Science · doi:10.1080/15230406.2024.2409915 · Cited by 6
Li, C., Swaminathan, S., & Kim, J. (2025) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-12-2023-0917 · Cited by 3
Tindle, R., & Longstaff, M. G. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2015.1135930 · Cited by 3
Facilitating Context Switching Through Tangible Artifacts
Okundaye, O., Quek, F. K. H., Sargunam, S. P., Suhail, M., & Das, R. (2017) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3027063.3053116 · Cited by 3
Connecting the Dots: Finding Continuity Across Visuospatial Tasks and Development
Perone, S., & Simmering, V. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01685 · Cited by 3
Antonio, R. D. L., & Pompéia, S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220222 · Cited by 4
Cortés-Rivera, C., & Cerić, F. (2020) · Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología · doi:10.1080/02109395.2020.1794719 · Cited by 3
MLE Strategies as Determinants of Executive Functions
Tzuriel, D. (2021) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75692-5_18 · Cited by 3
Stripeikyte, G., Pereira, M., Rognini, G., Potheegadoo, J., Blanke, O., & Faivre, N. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3164-20.2021 · Cited by 3
Valba, O. V., & Gorsky, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09499-w · Cited by 3
Multimedia in microbiology education: a critical sustainable resource
Grando, D. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818272-7.00011-0 · Cited by 3
The effect of video playback speed on learning and mind-wandering in younger and older adults
Murphy, D. H., Hoover, K. M., & Castel, A. D. (2023) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2023.2198264 · Cited by 3
RetractedHerbig, B., & Heiden, B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40615-8_4 · Cited by 3
Non-parametric Algorithm to Isolate Chunks in Response Sequences
Alamia, A., Solopchuk, O., Olivier, E., & Zénon, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00177 · Cited by 3
Instructional Strategy: Administration of Injury Scripts
Schilling, J. F. (2016) · Athletic Training Education Journal · doi:10.4085/1103152 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowan, Nelson
- ORCID
- Cowan, Nelson
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2864034
- OpenAlex
- W2134598164
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f52d0f7bdb639a9ea900f7d1fecb39468358b00
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021338)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, storage capacity, short-term memory, individual differences, memory span
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
