The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Magical Mystery Four: How Is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?
Open accessAbstract
Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed. The ability to repeat information depends on task demands but can be distinguished from a more constant, underlying mechanism: a central memory store limited to 3 to 5 meaningful items for young adults. I discuss why this central limit is important, how it can be observed, how it differs among individuals, and why it may exist.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cowan argues that working memory has a central storage limit of about 3–5 meaningful items or chunks in young adults, observable when rehearsal, grouping, and sensory memory are controlled. The limit predicts thought and individual differences, but its underlying reasons remain unresolved.
Key findings
- A central working memory store is limited to about 3–5 chunks in young adults; in running span, only the last 3–5 digits can be recalled, and with rehearsal prevented individuals remembered only about 3 units whether items were singletons or learned pairs.
- In a dual-modality array task, people remembered about 4 squares when attending only to squares; when attending to both squares and spoken digits, they remembered fewer squares but about 4 items in all, but only when a mask wiped out sensory memory.
- Age differences appeared in storage: 7-year-olds stored about 1.5 items versus about 3.0 for older children or adults; the attention advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults when the total field was small (4 items).
- Proposed explanations split into capacity limits as weaknesses (neural timing, interference, or neuron limits) versus strengths (efficient search, chunking, and learning imperfect rules).
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis of prior behavioral studies; no new primary experiment is reported.
- Describes tasks including running span, brief simultaneous spatial arrays, unattended auditory input, articulatory suppression, paired-word chunk learning, and visual/auditory dual arrays with masks and attention conditions.
- Capacity was estimated using a hit/false-alarm formula (Cowan, 2001), with comparisons across age, attention, modality, and chunk type.
Limitations
- Stated: the reasons for the central 3–5 chunk limit remain unclear; the hypotheses are not necessarily incompatible; and precise predictions cannot yet be made for every possible task.
- Stated: some key cited results were in press at the time (e.g., Chen & Cowan; Cowan et al.), limiting available detail.
- Evident: as a review, the conclusions depend on selected prior studies and task-specific controls, with no formal meta-analysis or new data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
25 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 3 Own result
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan et al., in press
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when verbal rehearsal was prevented by having the participant repeat the word “the” throughout the trial, individuals remembered only about 3 units, no matter whether those were singletons or learned pairs.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen and Cowan (in press)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young adults can recall 3 to 5 chunks from a presented list no matter whether these are learned pairs or singletons.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults, provided that the total number of items in the field was small (4).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundary conditions are also of practical use to predict performance when the material is too brief, long, or complex to allow processing strategies such as rehearsal or grouping.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This fixed capacity limit was obtained, though, only if the items to be recalled were followed by a jumble of meaningless, mixed visual and acoustic stimuli (a mask) so that sensory memory would be wiped out and the measure of working memory would be limited to central memory.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tests of working memory demonstrate practical limits that vary, depending on whether the test circumstances allow processes such as grouping or rehearsal, focusing of attention on just the material relevant to the task, and the use of modality- or material-specific stores to supplement a central store.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies indicate that working memory capacity varies among people, predicts individual differences in intellectual ability, and changes across the life span (Cowan, 2005).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Working memory is used in mental tasks, such as language comprehension (for example, retaining ideas from early in a sentence to be combined with ideas later on), problem solving (in arithmetic, carrying a digit from the ones to the tens column while remembering the numbers), and planning (determining the best order in which to visit the bank, library, and grocery).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was also an advantage for the test of the shape to be remembered, compared to the shape to be ignored; attention helped greatly.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage-specific capacity is a more analytic concept and stays constant across a much wider variety of circumstances.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some ways, the existing limits may be ideal, or nearly so, for humans.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are probably factors of biological economy limiting central capacity”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The reasons for the central working memory storage limit of 3–5 chunks remain unclear but Cowan (2005) reviewed a variety of hypotheses.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > WHY THE STORAGE CAPACITY LIMIT?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“if they were asked to attend to both squares and digits, they could remember fewer squares, but about 4 items in all.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That central memory is especially important because it underlies problem-solving and abstract thought.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Other work suggests that storage and processing capacities both make important, partly separate and partly overlapping contributions to intelligence and development (Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recall limit is important because it measures what is termed working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960), the few temporarily active thoughts.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“He demonstrated that one can repeat back a list of no more than about seven randomly ordered, meaningful items or chunks”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller (1956)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.
“Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, the limited processing capacity of a learner's working memory (WM) is considered a bottleneck (Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956); for new, yet to be learned information, its processing capacity is limited to only 4±1 elements (Cowan 2010)”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Cowan 2010
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Self-citationPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Brown, R. W. (1960) · Language · doi:10.2307/411065 · Cited by 3,525
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
Baddeley, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · Cited by 2,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04171 · Cited by 1,367
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 977
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,000
Topological change induces an interference effect in visual working memory
Wei, N., Zhou, T., Zhuo, Y., & Chen, L. (2021) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.21.10.4 · Cited by 10
Opening Questions in Visual Working Memory
Nobre, A. C. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01920 · Cited by 10
Gadzinski, G., & Castello, A. (2022) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003594 · Cited by 10
Chawoush, B., Draschkow, D., & van Ede, F. (2023) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.23.8.9 · Cited by 10
VISUAL WORKING MEMORY- GENDER AND AGE DIFFERENCES
Amundsen, M.-L., Garmannslund, P. E., & Stokke, H. S. (2014) · European Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.19044/ejes.v1no3a1 · Cited by 10
“70.6 Billion World Citizens”: Investigating the difficulty of interpreting numbers
Frittella, F. M. (2019) · The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research · doi:10.12807/ti.111201.2019.a05 · Cited by 10
Lancaster, T., Robins, A. V., & Fincher, S. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.015 · Cited by 11
A Reinforcement One-Shot Active Learning Approach for Aircraft Type Recognition
Huang, H., Feng, Y., Huang, J., Zhang, J., & Chen, L. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2946186 · Cited by 10
Visuospatial bootstrapping: spatialized displays enhance digit and nonword sequence learning
Darling, S., Havelka, J., Allen, R. J., Bunyan, E., & Flornes, L. (2020) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14429 · Cited by 10
Morente-Molinera, J. A., Wang, Y., Gong, Z., Morfeq, A., Al‐Hmouz, R., & Herrera‐Viedma, E. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2021.3062145 · Cited by 10
Fan, G., Carlson, K. D., & Thomas, R. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614280 · Cited by 10
Children’s Motor Learning and Working Memory: The Role of Visual and Verbal Analogy Learning
Ramezani, F., Saemi, E., & Doustan, M. (2022) · Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism · doi:10.2478/pjst-2022-0008 · Cited by 10
Working memory and attention in choice
Rustichini, A., Domenech, P., Civai, C., & DeYoung, C. G. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284127 · Cited by 12
The Limit of Mental Structures
Mandler, G. (2013) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2013.807217 · Cited by 10
Executive Functioning and Visual Working Memory
Lepach, A. C., Pauls, F., & Petermann, F. (2014) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2013.860603 · Cited by 11
The role of depth of encoding in attentional capture
Sasin, E. M., Nieuwenstein, M. R., & Johnson, A. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0807-6 · Cited by 10
Sensory processing patterns predict the integration of information held in visual working memory.
Lowe, M. X., Stevenson, R. A., Wilson, K. E., Ouslis, N. E., Barense, M. D., Cant, J. S., & Ferber, S. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000131 · Cited by 12
Deity Representation: A Prototype Approach
May, R. W., & Fincham, F. D. (2018) · Archive for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1163/15736121-12341361 · Cited by 10
Relation Between Working Memory Capacity of Biological Movements and Fluid Intelligence
Tian, Y., Li, P., Zhang, Q., Gu, Q., Lu, X., Gao, Z., & Shen, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02313 · Cited by 10
Refreshing and removing items in working memory: Different approaches to equivalent processes?
Lintz, E. N., & Johnson, M. R. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104655 · Cited by 10
Behavioural insight and regulatory governance
Drummond, J., Shephard, D. D., & Trnka, D. (2021) · OECD regulatory policy working papers · doi:10.1787/ee46b4af-en · Cited by 10
An embarrassment of richnesses: the PFC isn’t the content NCC
Kozuch, B. (2024) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niae017 · Cited by 9
Ramme, R. A., Neumann, D. L., & Donovan, C. L. (2022) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101782 · Cited by 9
Training diversity promotes absolute-value-guided choice
Solomyak, L., Sharp, P. B., & Eldar, E. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010664 · Cited by 10
Working memory constraints for visuomotor retrieval strategies
Velázquez-Vargas, C. A., & Taylor, J. A. (2024) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00122.2024 · Cited by 11
Ebaid, D., & Crewther, S. G. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66773-5 · Cited by 9
MINERVA-DE: An instance model of the deficient processing theory
Collins, R. N., Milliken, B., & Jamieson, R. K. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104151 · Cited by 9
Weigand, R., & Jacobsen, T. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211050194 · Cited by 9
Augmented Reality for Cognitive Impairments
Makhataeva, Z., Akhmetov, T., & Varol, H. A. (2023) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67822-7_31 · Cited by 11
Izhak, S. B., & Michal Lavidor, B. (2023) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2023.2172413 · Cited by 11
Gangata, H., & Vigurs, K. (2023) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.24035 · Cited by 11
Flexible control of representational dynamics in a disinhibition-based model of decision-making
Shen, B., Louie, K., & Glimcher, P. W. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.82426 · Cited by 9
Barnard, I. L., Onofrychuk, T. J., Toderash, A. D., Patel, V. N., Glass, A. E., Adrian, J. C., Laprairie, R. B., & Howland, J. G. (2023) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0115-23.2023 · Cited by 10
Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat
Missaire, M., Fraize, N., Joseph, M. A., Hamieh, A. M., Parmentier, R., Marighetto, A., Salin, P. A., & Malleret, G. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173834 · Cited by 9
Two retrievals from a single cue: A bottleneck persists across episodic and semantic memory
Orscheschek, F., Strobach, T., Schubert, T., & Rickard, T. C. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021818776818 · Cited by 11
Vahrenhold, J., Cutts, Q. I., & Falkner, K. E. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.019 · Cited by 11
Independence of viewpoint and identity in face ensemble processing
Sama, M. A., Nestor, A., & Cant, J. S. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.5.2 · Cited by 9
Bateman, J. E., & Birney, D. P. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102893 · Cited by 9
Executive working memory involved in the learning of contextual cueing effect
Chen, M., Wang, C., Sclodnick, B., Zhao, G. W., & Liu, X. (2019) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05643-7 · Cited by 9
Three visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention
King, M. J., & Macnamara, B. N. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67455-y · Cited by 9
The capacity and cognitive processing of vibrotactile working memory for frequency
Wang, C., Deng, H., Dong, Y. P., Zhang, X., & Wang, D.-H. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02212-6 · Cited by 9
Calub, C. A., Rapport, M. D., Irurita, C., Eckrich, S. J., & Bohil, C. J. (2022) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2022.2047913 · Cited by 9
Incorporating evolutionary adaptions into the cognitive fit model for data visualization
Bina, S., Kaskela, T., Jones, D. R., Walden, E. A., & Graue, W. (2023) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2023.113979 · Cited by 9
Tanaka, T., Sugimoto, M., Tanida, Y., & Saito, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00765 · Cited by 9
Ontogenetic shift in plant-related cognitive specialization by a mosquito-eating predator
Carvell, G. E., Jackson, R. R., & Cross, F. R. (2017) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.022 · Cited by 9
Perception in dynamic scenes: What is your Heider capacity?
Wick, F., Soce, A. A., Garg, S., Grace, R. C., & Wolfe, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000557 · Cited by 9
A Case Study of Qualitative Methods
Lewis, C. M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.032 · Cited by 14
Slot-like capacity and resource-like coding in a neural model of multiple-item working memory
Standage, D., & Paré, M. (2018) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00778.2017 · Cited by 10
The impact of concurrent linguistic tasks on participants’ identification of spearcons
Davidson, T. J., Ryu, Y., Brecknell, B., Loeb, R. G., & Sanderson, P. M. (2019) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102895 · Cited by 9
Stress in Undergraduate Students Studying Communication Sciences and Disorders
Roos, B. H., & Schreck, J. S. (2019) · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups · doi:10.1044/2019_pers-sig10-2019-0003 · Cited by 9
Worked Examples, Cognitive Load, and Exam Assessments in a Senior Database Course
Knorr, E. M. (2020) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3328778.3366915 · Cited by 9
The Neural Dynamics of Face Ensemble and Central Face Processing
Sama, M. A., Nestor, A., & Cant, J. S. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1027-23.2023 · Cited by 8
Arnicane, A., & Souza, A. S. (2022) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02394-y · Cited by 8
Fang, W., Wang, K., Zhang, K. K., & Qian, J. (2022) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12599 · Cited by 8
Tanesini, A. (2022) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12234 · Cited by 9
Oblak, A., Dragan, O., Ozimič, A. S., Kordeš, U., Purg, N., Bon, J., & Repovš, G. (2024) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2023.103628 · Cited by 9
Huffcutt, A. I., Howes, S. S., Murphy, D., & Murphy, S. A. (2024) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2024.01.001 · Cited by 8
Kattlun, F., Hertel, E., Geis, C., Scherag, A., Wickel, J., & Finke, K. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1321145 · Cited by 8
Explicit person memories constrain the indirect reciprocation of prosocial acts
Wilkowski, B. M., & Chai, C. A. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.005 · Cited by 10
A matter of emphasis: Linguistic stress habits modulate serial recall
Taylor, J. C., Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2014) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0466-2 · Cited by 8
Shapiro, R. B., & Tissenbaum, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.021 · Cited by 9
Examining the effects of frustration on working memory capacity
Fillauer, J. P., Bolden, J., Jacobson, M. H. S., Partlow, B. H., Benavides, A., & Shultz, J. N. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3587 · Cited by 11
Empirical Assessment of Typical versus Maximal Responding in Behavior Description Interviews
Huffcutt, A. I., Howes, S. S., Dustin, S., Chmielewski, A. N., Marshall, C. A., Metzger, R. L., & Gioia, V. P. (2020) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2020.1812075 · Cited by 8
Savoy, A., Saleem, J. J., Barker, B. C., Patel, H., & Kara, A. Y. (2021) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/28783 · Cited by 8
Limited Visual Working Memory Capacity in Children with Dyslexia: An ERP Study
Lotfi, S., Ward, R. T., Mathew, A. S., Shokoohi–Yekta, M., Rostami, R., Yeganeh, N. M., Christine, C., & Lee, H. (2022) · NeuroRegulation · doi:10.15540/nr.9.2.98 · Cited by 8
Han, Z., & Sereno, A. B. (2022) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01559 · Cited by 8
Clarke, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009588577 · Cited by 8
Behavioral Nudges and Consumer Technology
Wendel, S. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31319-1_5 · Cited by 8
A self-organizing short-term dynamical memory network
Federer, C., & Zylberberg, J. (2018) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2018.06.008 · Cited by 8
Haden, P. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.007 · Cited by 10
Crows control working memory before and after stimulus encoding
Fongaro, E., & Rose, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59975-4 · Cited by 9
Computing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7
Ai, H., Zhang, S., Si, C., Liu, T., Zheng, X., Tian, X., & Bai, W. (2025) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/s12993-025-00285-y · Cited by 7
The Temporal Scaffolding of Sensory Organization
Sinha, P., Vogelsang, L., Vogelsang, M., Yonas, A., & DIAMOND, S. P. (2025) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-032525-040352 · Cited by 8
Uyar, B. T. M., Brouwer, I. G., Herforth, A., Manners, R., Delfine, M., Hesen, R., den Berg, K. J. B., Feskens, E. J. M., & Talsma, E. F. (2025) · Current Developments in Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107628 · Cited by 7
Pathways from social contingency to infant language learning
Suárez-Rivera, C., & Tamis‐LeMonda, C. S. (2026) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0359 · Cited by 7
El efecto de la teoría de carga cognitiva en el aprendizaje de la programación básica
Mercado, C. A. A., Estrada-Rentería, B. G., & Andrade, E. L. M. (2019) · Entorno · doi:10.5377/entorno.v0i67.7500 · Cited by 9
Back to Basics: An Interpretable Multi-Class Grade Prediction Framework
Alharbi, B. (2021) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-021-06153-x · Cited by 7
Fabiani, M., Asnakew, B. A., Bowie, D. C., Chism, S., Clements, G. M., Gardner, J. C., Islam, S. S., Rubenstein, S. L., & Gratton, G. (2022) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2022.08.001 · Cited by 8
Can’t see the forest for the trees
Szepannek, G., & von Holt, B.-H. (2023) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-023-00205-2 · Cited by 7
Self-Organization of Nonlinearly Coupled Neural Fluctuations Into Synergistic Population Codes
Ma, H., Qi, Y., Gong, P., Zhang, J., Lu, W., & Feng, J. (2023) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01612 · Cited by 9
Agustín, A. S., Crevillén, D., Soto-León, V., Moreno‐Piraján, J. C., Oliviero, A., & Pons, J. L. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295413 · Cited by 7
EEG, Pupil Dilations, and Other Physiological Measures of Working Memory Load in the Sternberg Task
Ahmadi, M., Michalka, S., Najafabadi, M. A., Wünsche, B. C., & Billinghurst, M. (2024) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti8040034 · Cited by 9
Systemizing Colour for Conceptual Modeling
Stark, J., Braun, R., & Esswein, W. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 7
Student Knowledge and Misconceptions
Lewis, C. M., Clancy, M. J., & Vahrenhold, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.028 · Cited by 7
Efficacy of Working Memory Training in Middle-aged Adults
George, V. M., Bajaj, G., & Bhat, J. S. (2020) · Eon'eo cheong'gag jang'ae yeon'gu/Communication sciences & disorders · doi:10.12963/csd.20768 · Cited by 8
Grouping effects in immediate reconstruction of order and the preconditions for long-term learning
Guitard, D., Saint‐Aubin, J., & Cowan, N. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211030825 · Cited by 7
Self-citationAgarwal, A., Graft, J., Schroeder, N. L., & Romine, W. L. (2021) · Signals · doi:10.3390/signals2040051 · Cited by 8
Verbal Learning and Hemispheric Asymmetry
Kljajević, V. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.809192 · Cited by 7
Capacity and Allocation across Sensory and Short-Term Memories
Wang, S., Tripathy, S. P., & Öğmen, H. (2022) · Vision · doi:10.3390/vision6010015 · Cited by 7
Varying retrieval conditions to study survival processing
Alban, M. W., & Annibal, S. C. (2022) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2022.2080226 · Cited by 7
Film in university teaching: optimising multimodal pedagogies through film literacy
Nguyen, N. N. (2023) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2163161 · Cited by 7
Yim, H. B., Lee, S. M., & Seong, P. H. (2013) · Annals of Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2013.10.029 · Cited by 7
Krefeld-Schwalb, A. (2018) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000400 · Cited by 7
You Want to Spend My Money How? Framing Effects on Tax Increases via Ballot Propositions
Braidwood, T. (2018) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1532440018798813 · Cited by 9
Shephard, K. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.011 · Cited by 8
A Fine-grained Assessment on Novice Programmers’ Gaze Patterns on Pseudocode Problems
Obaidellah, U. H. B., Blascheck, T., Guarnera, H. M., & Maletic, J. I. (2020) · ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA) · doi:10.1145/3379156.3391982 · Cited by 7
Tamm, G., Kreegipuu, K., & Harro, J. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103117 · Cited by 7
Convergent evidence for a theory of rapid, automatic, and accurate sex ratio tracking
Brandner, J. L., Dillon, H., & Brase, G. L. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103161 · Cited by 8
Changing-state irrelevant speech disrupts visual–verbal but not visual–spatial serial recall.
Marsh, J. E., Hurlstone, M. J., Marois, A., Ball, L. J., Moore, S. B., Vachon, F., Schlittmeier, S. J., Röer, J. P., Buchner, A., Aust, F., et al. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0001360 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowan, Nelson
- ORCID
- Cowan, Nelson
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2864034
- OpenAlex
- W2134598164
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f52d0f7bdb639a9ea900f7d1fecb39468358b00
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021338)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, storage capacity, short-term memory, individual differences, memory span
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
