The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Magical Mystery Four: How Is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?
Open accessAbstract
Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed. The ability to repeat information depends on task demands but can be distinguished from a more constant, underlying mechanism: a central memory store limited to 3 to 5 meaningful items for young adults. I discuss why this central limit is important, how it can be observed, how it differs among individuals, and why it may exist.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cowan argues that working memory has a central storage limit of about 3–5 meaningful items or chunks in young adults, observable when rehearsal, grouping, and sensory memory are controlled. The limit predicts thought and individual differences, but its underlying reasons remain unresolved.
Key findings
- A central working memory store is limited to about 3–5 chunks in young adults; in running span, only the last 3–5 digits can be recalled, and with rehearsal prevented individuals remembered only about 3 units whether items were singletons or learned pairs.
- In a dual-modality array task, people remembered about 4 squares when attending only to squares; when attending to both squares and spoken digits, they remembered fewer squares but about 4 items in all, but only when a mask wiped out sensory memory.
- Age differences appeared in storage: 7-year-olds stored about 1.5 items versus about 3.0 for older children or adults; the attention advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults when the total field was small (4 items).
- Proposed explanations split into capacity limits as weaknesses (neural timing, interference, or neuron limits) versus strengths (efficient search, chunking, and learning imperfect rules).
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis of prior behavioral studies; no new primary experiment is reported.
- Describes tasks including running span, brief simultaneous spatial arrays, unattended auditory input, articulatory suppression, paired-word chunk learning, and visual/auditory dual arrays with masks and attention conditions.
- Capacity was estimated using a hit/false-alarm formula (Cowan, 2001), with comparisons across age, attention, modality, and chunk type.
Limitations
- Stated: the reasons for the central 3–5 chunk limit remain unclear; the hypotheses are not necessarily incompatible; and precise predictions cannot yet be made for every possible task.
- Stated: some key cited results were in press at the time (e.g., Chen & Cowan; Cowan et al.), limiting available detail.
- Evident: as a review, the conclusions depend on selected prior studies and task-specific controls, with no formal meta-analysis or new data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
25 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 3 Own result
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan et al., in press
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when verbal rehearsal was prevented by having the participant repeat the word “the” throughout the trial, individuals remembered only about 3 units, no matter whether those were singletons or learned pairs.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen and Cowan (in press)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young adults can recall 3 to 5 chunks from a presented list no matter whether these are learned pairs or singletons.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults, provided that the total number of items in the field was small (4).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundary conditions are also of practical use to predict performance when the material is too brief, long, or complex to allow processing strategies such as rehearsal or grouping.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This fixed capacity limit was obtained, though, only if the items to be recalled were followed by a jumble of meaningless, mixed visual and acoustic stimuli (a mask) so that sensory memory would be wiped out and the measure of working memory would be limited to central memory.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tests of working memory demonstrate practical limits that vary, depending on whether the test circumstances allow processes such as grouping or rehearsal, focusing of attention on just the material relevant to the task, and the use of modality- or material-specific stores to supplement a central store.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies indicate that working memory capacity varies among people, predicts individual differences in intellectual ability, and changes across the life span (Cowan, 2005).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Working memory is used in mental tasks, such as language comprehension (for example, retaining ideas from early in a sentence to be combined with ideas later on), problem solving (in arithmetic, carrying a digit from the ones to the tens column while remembering the numbers), and planning (determining the best order in which to visit the bank, library, and grocery).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was also an advantage for the test of the shape to be remembered, compared to the shape to be ignored; attention helped greatly.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage-specific capacity is a more analytic concept and stays constant across a much wider variety of circumstances.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some ways, the existing limits may be ideal, or nearly so, for humans.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are probably factors of biological economy limiting central capacity”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The reasons for the central working memory storage limit of 3–5 chunks remain unclear but Cowan (2005) reviewed a variety of hypotheses.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > WHY THE STORAGE CAPACITY LIMIT?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“if they were asked to attend to both squares and digits, they could remember fewer squares, but about 4 items in all.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That central memory is especially important because it underlies problem-solving and abstract thought.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Other work suggests that storage and processing capacities both make important, partly separate and partly overlapping contributions to intelligence and development (Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recall limit is important because it measures what is termed working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960), the few temporarily active thoughts.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“He demonstrated that one can repeat back a list of no more than about seven randomly ordered, meaningful items or chunks”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller (1956)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.
“Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, the limited processing capacity of a learner's working memory (WM) is considered a bottleneck (Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956); for new, yet to be learned information, its processing capacity is limited to only 4±1 elements (Cowan 2010)”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Cowan 2010
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Self-citationPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Brown, R. W. (1960) · Language · doi:10.2307/411065 · Cited by 3,525
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
Baddeley, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · Cited by 2,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04171 · Cited by 1,367
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 977
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Rhodes, S., Graham, A. J., Doherty, J. M., Belletier, C., Naveh‐Benjamin, M., Cowan, N., Camos, V., Barrouillet, P., & Logie, R. H. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000539 · Cited by 63
Self-citationVerschooren, S., Schindler, S., Raedt, R. D., & Pourtois, G. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01568-y · Cited by 63
When products compete for consumers attention: How selective attention affects preferences
Florack, A., Egger, M., & Hübner, R. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.009 · Cited by 63
Horn, M., & Bers, M. U. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.023 · Cited by 63
Designing Mid-Air TV Gestures for Blind People Using User- and Choice-Based Elicitation Approaches
Dim, N. K., Silpasuwanchai, C., Sarcar, S., & Ren, X. (2016) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/2901790.2901834 · Cited by 62
Writing In-Code Comments to Self-Explain in Computational Science and Engineering Education
Vieira, C., Magana, A. J., Falk, M. L., & Garcı́a, R. E. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3058751 · Cited by 66
Optimizing Lectures From a Cognitive Load Perspective
Jordan, J., Wagner, J., Manthey, D. E., Wolff, M., Santen, S. A., & Cico, S. J. (2019) · AEM Education and Training · doi:10.1002/aet2.10389 · Cited by 61
The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm
Olkoniemi, H., Johander, E., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2018) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-018-0852-2 · Cited by 60
Darling, S., Allen, R. J., & Havelka, J. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721416665342 · Cited by 65
On the working memory of humans and great apes: Strikingly similar or remarkably different?
Read, D., Manrique, H. M., & WALKER, M. J. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.019 · Cited by 58
Increasing population size can inhibit cumulative cultural evolution
Fay, N., Kleine, N. D., Walker, B., & Caldwell, C. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1811413116 · Cited by 58
A primer on dichotic listening as a paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric asymmetry
Westerhausen, R. (2019) · Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1080/1357650x.2019.1598426 · Cited by 63
The History of Computing Education Research
Guzdial, M., & du Boulay, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.002 · Cited by 66
The Interplay Between Working Memory and Background Knowledge in L2 Reading Comprehension
Shin, J.-H., Dronjic, V., & Park, B.-J. (2018) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.482 · Cited by 59
Representation of different exact numbers of prey by a spider-eating predator
Cross, F. R., & Jackson, R. R. (2017) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2016.0035 · Cited by 56
The Capacity of Cognitive Control Estimated from a Perceptual Decision Making Task
Wu, T., Dufford, A. J., Mackie, M., Egan, L. J., & Fan, J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34025 · Cited by 55
Exact neural mass model for synaptic-based working memory
Taher, H., Torcini, A., & Olmi, S. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008533 · Cited by 60
Uniquely human intelligence arose from expanded information capacity
Cantlon, J. F., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2024) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00283-3 · Cited by 61
A new interpretable fault diagnosis method based on belief rule base and probability table
Ming, Z., Zhou, Z., Cao, Y., Tang, S., Yuan, C. H. E. N., Han, X., & He, W. (2022) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2022.08.003 · Cited by 53
Holding Multiple Items in Short Term Memory: A Neural Mechanism
Rolls, E. T., Dempere‐Marco, L., & Deco, G. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061078 · Cited by 54
Solanke, A. A. (2022) · Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2022.301403 · Cited by 52
Xie, W., & Zhang, W. (2017) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0739-7 · Cited by 52
Lei, L., & Wen, J. (2019) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102762 · Cited by 52
Hadie, S. N. H., Tan, V. P. S., Omar, N., Alwi, N. A. N. M., Lim, H. L., & Ishak, K. M. K. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.739238 · Cited by 55
Candido, V., & Cattaneo, A. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100678 · Cited by 60
A study on the effects of routing symbol design on process model comprehension
Figl, K., Recker, J., & Mendling, J. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.037 · Cited by 54
Improving working memory in children with low language abilities
Holmes, J., Butterfield, S., Cormack, F. K., van Loenhoud, A. C., Ruggero, L., Kashikar, L., & Gathercole, S. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00519 · Cited by 55
Burdick–Will, J., Grigg, J. A., Nerenberg, K. M., & Connolly, F. (2020) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122420934739 · Cited by 51
Increasing the Speed and Accuracy of Data Labeling Through an AI Assisted Interface
Desmond, M., Muller, M. J., Ashktorab, Z., Dugan, C., Duesterwald, E., Brimijoin, K., Finegan‐Dollak, C., Brachman, M., Sharma, A., Joshi, N. N., et al. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3397481.3450698 · Cited by 56
Jaiswal, S., Tsai, S., Juan, C.-H., Liang, W., & Muggleton, N. G. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00627 · Cited by 55
Popova, M., & Bretz, S. L. (2018) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c8rp00064f · Cited by 50
The Planning Horizon for Movement Sequences
Ariani, G., Kordjazi, N., Pruszynski, J. A., & Diedrichsen, J. (2021) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0085-21.2021 · Cited by 49
The effect of metacognitive training on confidence and strategic reminder setting
Engeler, N. C., & Gilbert, S. J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240858 · Cited by 52
Gignac, G. E. (2014) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.001 · Cited by 54
neuroGPT-X: toward a clinic-ready large language model
Guo, E., Gupta, M., Sinha, S., Rössler, K., Tatagiba, M. S., Akagami, R., Al‐Mefty, O., Sugiyama, T., Stieg, P. E., Pickett, G. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2023.7.jns23573 · Cited by 50
Scarampi, C., & Gilbert, S. J. (2020) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1764974 · Cited by 51
Augmented reality and visuospatial bootstrapping for second-language vocabulary recall
Costuchen, A. L., Darling, S., & Uytman, C. (2020) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2020.1806848 · Cited by 51
Mental workload as a key factor in clinical decision making
Byrne, A. (2013) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9360-5 · Cited by 47
Relationships Between Auditory Processing and Cognitive Abilities in Adults: A Systematic Review
Davidson, A. J., & Souza, P. E. (2023) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2023_jslhr-22-00716 · Cited by 47
Neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning: A systematic review with narrative synthesis
Cunff, A. L., Giampietro, V., & Dommett, E. J. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100604 · Cited by 57
Martín‐Raugh, M. P., Kell, H. J., Randall, J. G., Anguiano‐Carrasco, C., & Banfi, J. T. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2670 · Cited by 51
The Downsides of Cognitive Enhancement
Colzato, L. S., Hommel, B., & Beste, C. (2020) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858420945971 · Cited by 45
When learning goes beyond statistics: Infants represent visual sequences in terms of chunks
Slone, L. K., & Johnson, S. P. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.016 · Cited by 45
Salvidegoitia, M. P., Jacobsen, N. S. J., Bauer, A. R., Griffiths, B. J., Hanslmayr, S., & Debener, S. (2019) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13331 · Cited by 45
Assessing Mathematics Self-Efficacy
Toland, M. D., & Usher, E. L. (2015) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431615588952 · Cited by 45
Attention as foraging for information and value
Manohar, S., & Husain, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00711 · Cited by 50
Scharinger, C., Prislan, L., Bernecker, K., & Ninaus, M. (2023) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108545 · Cited by 44
Assessing the validity of the cognitive load scale in a problem-based learning setting
Hadie, S. N. H., & Yusoff, M. S. B. (2016) · Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.04.001 · Cited by 48
Spatial Encoding Strategy Theory
Margulieux, L. E. (2019) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/3291279.3339414 · Cited by 49
The role of task sequencing in L2 development as mediated by working memory capacity
Levkina, M. (2014) · Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) · Cited by 44
Hadie, S. N. H., Hassan, A., Ismail, Z. I. M., Ismail, H. N., Talip, S. B., & Rahim, A. F. A. (2016) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1252685 · Cited by 49
A Construction Grammar Approach to Genre
Hoffman, T., & Bergs, A. T. (2018) · Cognitextes · doi:10.4000/cognitextes.1032 · Cited by 43
On the importance of working memory in the driving safety field: A systematic review
Zhang, H., Guo, Y., Yuan, W., & Li, K. (2023) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2023.107071 · Cited by 43
Biggs, A. T., Seech, T. R., Johnston, S. L., & Russell, D. W. (2023) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2023.2253955 · Cited by 49
Passphrase and keystroke dynamics authentication: Usable security
Bhana, B., & Flowerday, S. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.101925 · Cited by 43
Striatum and language processing: Where do we stand?
Jacquemot, C., & Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104785 · Cited by 42
Gulley, A., Smith, L. A. M., Price, J. A., Prickett, L., & Ragland, M. F. (2017) · Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness · doi:10.1177/0145482x1711100507 · Cited by 42
Martin, A. J., Collie, R. J., Kennett, R., Liu, D., Ginns, P., Sudimantara, L. B., Dewi, E. W., & Rüschenpöhler, L. (2025) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102723 · Cited by 51
Parra, M. A., Calia, C., García, A. F., Olazarán, J., Hernandez-Tamames, J. A., Álvarez‐Linera, J., Sala, S. D., & GUINEA, S. B. F. (2019) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2019.03.025 · Cited by 44
Hartmann, M., Martarelli, C., Reber, T. P., & Rothen, N. (2020) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2020.103033 · Cited by 46
Nieder, A. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104865 · Cited by 41
Shaw, J. S., & Hosseini, S. M. H. (2021) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.14283/jpad.2020.55 · Cited by 41
On the Subitizing Effect in Language Contact
Gardani, F., & Zanini, C. (2022) · Literacy studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99891-2_10 · Cited by 41
Self-Control in Cyberspace: Applying Dual Systems Theory to a Review of Digital Self-Control Tools
Lyngs, U., Lukoff, K., Slovák, P., Binns, R., Slack, A., Inzlicht, M., Kleek, M. G. V., & Shadbolt, N. (2019) · Research Portal (King's College London) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.00157 · Cited by 42
Attention as a multi‐level system of weights and balances
Narhi‐Martinez, W., Dube, B., & Golomb, J. D. (2022) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1633 · Cited by 46
Flexible Working Memory Through Selective Gating and Attentional Tagging
Kruijne, W., Bohté, S. M., Roelfsema, P. R., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2020) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01339 · Cited by 41
The incremental predictive validity of teaching, cognitive and social presence on cognitive load
Kozan, K. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.003 · Cited by 43
Tan, G., Adams, J., Donovan, K. M., Demarest, P., Willie, J. T., Brunner, P., Gorlewicz, J. L., & Leuthardt, E. C. (2024) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2024.04.002 · Cited by 39
Multiplexed subspaces route neural activity across brain-wide networks
MacDowell, C. J., Libby, A., Jahn, C. I., Tafazoli, S., Ardalan, A., & Buschman, T. J. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58698-2 · Cited by 49
Memory for sound, with an ear toward hearing in complex auditory scenes
Snyder, J. S., & Gregg, M. K. (2011) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0189-4 · Cited by 47
Transfer of know-how based on learning outcomes for development of open innovation
Dubickis, M., & Gaile-Sarkane, E. (2017) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1186/s40852-017-0053-4 · Cited by 45
Associating working memory capacity and code change ordering with code review performance
Baum, T., Schneider, K. A., & Bacchelli, A. (2019) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-018-9676-8 · Cited by 39
Cognitive Sciences for Computing Education
Robins, A. V., Margulieux, L. E., & Morrison, B. B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.010 · Cited by 44
Ruíz, S., Rebuschat, P., & Meurers, D. (2019) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168819872859 · Cited by 48
The (Un)Clear Effects of Invalid Retro-Cues
Gressmann, M., & Janczyk, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00244 · Cited by 43
Puri, I. (2024) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13417 · Cited by 42
Glare and cognitive performance in screen work in the presence of sunlight
Rodríguez, R., Garretón, J. A. Y., & Pattini, A. (2015) · Lighting Research & Technology · doi:10.1177/1477153515577851 · Cited by 41
Charting the development of sport expertise: challenges and opportunities
Farrow, D., Reid, M. M., Buszard, T., & Kovalchik, S. A. (2017) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2017.1290817 · Cited by 38
At a Glance: Pixel Approximate Entropy as a Measure of Line Chart Complexity
Ryan, G., Mosca, A., Chang, R., & Wu, E. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2865264 · Cited by 38
Goghari, V. M., & Lawlor‐Savage, L. (2017) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00039 · Cited by 42
Measuring working memory capacity on the web with the online working memory lab (the OWL).
Hicks, K. L., Foster, J. L., & Engle, R. W. (2016) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.010 · Cited by 37
Howard, S. R., Avarguès‐Weber, A., García, J. E., Greentree, A. D., & Dyer, A. G. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205658 · Cited by 37
Expertise effects on the perceptual and cognitive tasks of indoor rock climbing
Whitaker, M. M., Pointon, G. D., Tarampi, M. R., & Rand, K. M. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00985-7 · Cited by 37
The role of working memory in long-term learning: Implications for childhood development
Forsberg, A., Adams, E. J., & Cowan, N. (2021) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2021.02.001 · Cited by 40
Self-citationThe contribution of working memory to divided attention
Santangelo, V., & Macaluso, E. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21430 · Cited by 37
Numerosity Categorization by Parity in an Insect and Simple Neural Network
Howard, S. R., Greentree, J., Avarguès‐Weber, A., García, J. E., Greentree, A. D., & Dyer, A. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.805385 · Cited by 36
Computing EducationLiterature Review and Voices from the Field
Blikstein, P., & Moghadam, S. H. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.004 · Cited by 43
van Maarseveen, O. E. C., Ham, W. H. W., van de Ven, N. L. M., Saris, T. F. F., & Leenen, L. P. H. (2019) · European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00068-019-01181-7 · Cited by 36
du Toit, S. A., Kade, S. A., Danielson, C. T., Schweizer, S., Han, J., Torok, M. H., & Wong, Q. J. J. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.085 · Cited by 36
Jones, P. R. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.04.006 · Cited by 35
Evaluating the Impact of a Multistrategy Inference Intervention for Middle-Grade Struggling Readers
Barth, A. E., & Elleman, A. M. (2016) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2016_lshss-16-0041 · Cited by 43
What College Teachers Should Know About Memory: A Perspective From Cognitive Psychology
Miller, M. (2011) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2011.580636 · Cited by 35
Working Memory Systems in the Rat
Bratch, A., Kann, S., Cain, J. A., Wu, J.-E., Rivera-Reyes, N., Dalecki, S. J., Arman, D., Dunn, A., Echevarria‐Cooper, S. L., Corbin, H. E., et al. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.068 · Cited by 35
Sankalaite, S., Huizinga, M., Warreyn, P., Dewandeleer, J., & Baeyens, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240741 · Cited by 42
Şimşek, B., DİREKÇİ, B., Koparan, B., Canbulat, M., Gülmez, M., & Nalçacıgil, E. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12864-z · Cited by 34
Context-Informed Scheduling and Analysis
van Berkel, N., Gonçalves, J., Koval, P., Hosio, S. J., Dingler, T., Ferreira, D., & Kostakos, V. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300281 · Cited by 34
Mapping Mind-Brain Development: Towards a Comprehensive Theory
Spanoudis, G. C., & Δημητρίου, Α. (2020) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence8020019 · Cited by 36
No Evidence for an Object Working Memory Capacity Benefit with Extended Viewing Time
Quirk, C., Adam, K. C. S., & Vogel, E. K. (2020) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0150-20.2020 · Cited by 34
Reconceptualizing Working Memory in Educational Research
Fenesi, B., Sana, F., Kim, J. A., & Shore, D. I. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9286-y · Cited by 40
The stability of working memory: Do previous tasks influence complex span?
Healey, M. K., Hasher, L., & Danilova, E. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0024587 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowan, Nelson
- ORCID
- Cowan, Nelson
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2864034
- OpenAlex
- W2134598164
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f52d0f7bdb639a9ea900f7d1fecb39468358b00
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021338)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, storage capacity, short-term memory, individual differences, memory span
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
