The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Magical Mystery Four: How Is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?
Open accessAbstract
Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed. The ability to repeat information depends on task demands but can be distinguished from a more constant, underlying mechanism: a central memory store limited to 3 to 5 meaningful items for young adults. I discuss why this central limit is important, how it can be observed, how it differs among individuals, and why it may exist.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cowan argues that working memory has a central storage limit of about 3–5 meaningful items or chunks in young adults, observable when rehearsal, grouping, and sensory memory are controlled. The limit predicts thought and individual differences, but its underlying reasons remain unresolved.
Key findings
- A central working memory store is limited to about 3–5 chunks in young adults; in running span, only the last 3–5 digits can be recalled, and with rehearsal prevented individuals remembered only about 3 units whether items were singletons or learned pairs.
- In a dual-modality array task, people remembered about 4 squares when attending only to squares; when attending to both squares and spoken digits, they remembered fewer squares but about 4 items in all, but only when a mask wiped out sensory memory.
- Age differences appeared in storage: 7-year-olds stored about 1.5 items versus about 3.0 for older children or adults; the attention advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults when the total field was small (4 items).
- Proposed explanations split into capacity limits as weaknesses (neural timing, interference, or neuron limits) versus strengths (efficient search, chunking, and learning imperfect rules).
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis of prior behavioral studies; no new primary experiment is reported.
- Describes tasks including running span, brief simultaneous spatial arrays, unattended auditory input, articulatory suppression, paired-word chunk learning, and visual/auditory dual arrays with masks and attention conditions.
- Capacity was estimated using a hit/false-alarm formula (Cowan, 2001), with comparisons across age, attention, modality, and chunk type.
Limitations
- Stated: the reasons for the central 3–5 chunk limit remain unclear; the hypotheses are not necessarily incompatible; and precise predictions cannot yet be made for every possible task.
- Stated: some key cited results were in press at the time (e.g., Chen & Cowan; Cowan et al.), limiting available detail.
- Evident: as a review, the conclusions depend on selected prior studies and task-specific controls, with no formal meta-analysis or new data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
25 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 3 Own result
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan et al., in press
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when verbal rehearsal was prevented by having the participant repeat the word “the” throughout the trial, individuals remembered only about 3 units, no matter whether those were singletons or learned pairs.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen and Cowan (in press)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young adults can recall 3 to 5 chunks from a presented list no matter whether these are learned pairs or singletons.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults, provided that the total number of items in the field was small (4).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundary conditions are also of practical use to predict performance when the material is too brief, long, or complex to allow processing strategies such as rehearsal or grouping.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This fixed capacity limit was obtained, though, only if the items to be recalled were followed by a jumble of meaningless, mixed visual and acoustic stimuli (a mask) so that sensory memory would be wiped out and the measure of working memory would be limited to central memory.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tests of working memory demonstrate practical limits that vary, depending on whether the test circumstances allow processes such as grouping or rehearsal, focusing of attention on just the material relevant to the task, and the use of modality- or material-specific stores to supplement a central store.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies indicate that working memory capacity varies among people, predicts individual differences in intellectual ability, and changes across the life span (Cowan, 2005).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Working memory is used in mental tasks, such as language comprehension (for example, retaining ideas from early in a sentence to be combined with ideas later on), problem solving (in arithmetic, carrying a digit from the ones to the tens column while remembering the numbers), and planning (determining the best order in which to visit the bank, library, and grocery).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was also an advantage for the test of the shape to be remembered, compared to the shape to be ignored; attention helped greatly.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage-specific capacity is a more analytic concept and stays constant across a much wider variety of circumstances.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some ways, the existing limits may be ideal, or nearly so, for humans.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are probably factors of biological economy limiting central capacity”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The reasons for the central working memory storage limit of 3–5 chunks remain unclear but Cowan (2005) reviewed a variety of hypotheses.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > WHY THE STORAGE CAPACITY LIMIT?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“if they were asked to attend to both squares and digits, they could remember fewer squares, but about 4 items in all.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That central memory is especially important because it underlies problem-solving and abstract thought.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Other work suggests that storage and processing capacities both make important, partly separate and partly overlapping contributions to intelligence and development (Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recall limit is important because it measures what is termed working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960), the few temporarily active thoughts.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“He demonstrated that one can repeat back a list of no more than about seven randomly ordered, meaningful items or chunks”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller (1956)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.
“Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, the limited processing capacity of a learner's working memory (WM) is considered a bottleneck (Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956); for new, yet to be learned information, its processing capacity is limited to only 4±1 elements (Cowan 2010)”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Cowan 2010
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Self-citationPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Brown, R. W. (1960) · Language · doi:10.2307/411065 · Cited by 3,525
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
Baddeley, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · Cited by 2,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04171 · Cited by 1,367
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 977
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Lloyd, M. L., & Berry, J. A. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818272-7.00003-1 · Cited by 15
Ibarrola, A. L. (2023) · Trends in language acquisition research · doi:10.1075/tilar.32 · Cited by 15
Chen, C., Zhang, D., Zhang, F., & Zhang, F. (2023) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101269 · Cited by 19
Hart, R., Logie, R. H., & Brown, L. A. (2024) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241284414 · Cited by 15
Cognitive Performance Impact of Augmented Reality for Network Operations Tasks
Beitzel, S., Dykstra, J., Huver, S. D., Kaplan, M., Loushine, M., & Youzwak, J. A. (2016) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41932-9_12 · Cited by 15
Effects of information accuracy and volume on decision making
Gamble, K. R., Cassenti, D. N., & Buchler, N. (2018) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995605.2018.1425586 · Cited by 16
Cognitive Load Drivers in Large Scale Software Development
Helgesson, D., Engström, E., Runeson, P., & Bjarnason, E. (2019) · International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE) · doi:10.1109/chase.2019.00030 · Cited by 15
Memory: Normative development of memory systems
Bouyeure, A., & Noulhiane, M. (2020) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-64150-2.00018-6 · Cited by 19
Designing Task Resumption Cues for Interruptions in Mobile Learning Scenarios
Schneegass, C., & Draxler, F. (2021) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30457-7_5 · Cited by 17
Binding Costs in Processing Efficiency as Determinants of Cognitive Ability
Goecke, B., Schmitz, F., & Wilhelm, O. (2021) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence9020018 · Cited by 15
Assessing the robustness of feature-based selection in visual working memory.
Arnicane, A., & Souza, A. S. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000911 · Cited by 15
Dotan, D., & Brutmann, N. (2022) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-022-00409-2 · Cited by 15
First come first served: the impact of file position on code review
Fregnan, E., Braz, L., D’Ambros, M., Çalıklı, G., & Bacchelli, A. (2022) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3540250.3549177 · Cited by 15
Towards machines that understand people
Howes, A., Jokinen, J., & Oulasvirta, A. (2023) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12116 · Cited by 19
Spatial Working Memory in the LIDA Cognitive Architecture
Madl, T., Franklin, S., Chen, K., & Trappl, R. (2013) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 15
Forget Me if You Can: Attentional capture by to-Be-remembered and to-Be-forgotten visual stimuli
Sasin, E. M., Morey, C. C., & Nieuwenstein, M. R. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1225-0 · Cited by 15
Short-term memory capacity and sensitivity to language statistics in dyslexia and among musicians
Kimel, E., Weiss, A. H., Jakoby, H., Daikhin, L., & Ahissar, M. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107624 · Cited by 16
Wirzberger, M., Bijarsari, S. E., & Rey, G. D. (2017) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.07.001 · Cited by 15
A novel approach for predicting usability of upper limb prostheses
Park, J., Zahabi, M., Huang, H., & Benden, M. E. (2024) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104344 · Cited by 14
Differentiated measurement of cognitive loads in computer programming
Quintero-Manes, R., & Vieira, C. (2024) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-024-09411-7 · Cited by 14
Disentangling processing and storage accounts of working memory development in childhood
Superbia-Guimarães, L., & Cowan, N. (2023) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2023.101089 · Cited by 14
Self-citationSigut, J., Fumero, F., Arnay, R., Estevez, J. I., & Díaz-Alemán, T. (2023) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad0798 · Cited by 14
Hutson, J., Franklin, A. E., Rogers, B., & Walker, D. (2024) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101607 · Cited by 16
Hepdarcan, I., & Can, S. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07318-9 · Cited by 15
Simmering, V. R., & Miller, H. E. (2016) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1163-y · Cited by 14
On ways to overcome the magical capacity limit of working memory
Turi, Z., Alekseichuk, I., & Paulus, W. (2018) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2005867 · Cited by 14
Pull the Andon Rope on Working Memory Capacity Interventions Until We Know More
Gillam, S. L., Holbrook, S., Mecham, J., & Weller, D. (2018) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2018_lshss-17-0121 · Cited by 15
Geissler, C. F., Domes, G., & Frings, C. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107570 · Cited by 16
Lotfi, S., Ward, R. T., Ayazi, M., Bennett, K. P., Larson, C. L., & Lee, H. (2020) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-020-10164-7 · Cited by 17
Latching dynamics as a basis for short-term recall
Ryom, K. I., Boboeva, V., Soldatkina, O., & Treves, A. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008809 · Cited by 14
Aktürk, T., de Graaf, T. A., Erdal, F., Sack, A. T., & Güntekin, B. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119650 · Cited by 14
Byrne, A. J. (2012) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07053.x · Cited by 14
Lukasik, K. M., Lehtonen, M., Salmi, J., Meinzer, M., Joutsa, J., & Laine, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00738 · Cited by 14
Engineering Education Research
Loui, M. C., & Borrego, M. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.012 · Cited by 17
van de Vijver, I., & Ligneul, R. (2019) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2019.1664389 · Cited by 14
Human factors engineering approaches to patient identification armband design
Probst, C. A., Wolf, L., Bollini, M. L., & Xiao, Y. (2015) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.018 · Cited by 14
There is a simplicity bias when generalising from ambiguous data
Durvasula, K., & Liter, A. (2020) · Phonology · doi:10.1017/s0952675720000093 · Cited by 14
Cognitive Offloading in Short-Term Memory Tasks: Trust Toward Tools as a Moderator
Peng, J.-L., & Yeh, S. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2474449 · Cited by 13
Craver, C. F., Graham, B., & Rosenbaum, R. S. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.11.001 · Cited by 13
Graham, A. J., Rhodes, S., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Cowan, N., Naveh‐Benjamin, M., Barrouillet, P., Camos, V., & Logie, R. H. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021820970744 · Cited by 14
Self-citationFrom pre‐activation to pre‐updating: A threshold mechanism for commitment to strong predictions
Ness, T., & Meltzer‐Asscher, A. (2021) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13797 · Cited by 13
Pereira, A. E., Kelly, M. O., Lu, X., & Risko, E. F. (2021) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2021.1990347 · Cited by 13
Toth, P. D. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12490 · Cited by 16
Working memory impairment in relation to the severity of anxiety symptoms
Lisica, D., Koso-Drljević, M., Stürmer, B., Džubur, A., & Valt, C. (2022) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2022.2081535 · Cited by 14
Explaining emergency physicians’ capacity to recover from interruptions
Falkland, E. C., Wiggins, M. W., Douglas, H., Sturman, D., Auton, J. C., Shieh, L. Y., & Westbrook, J. I. (2022) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103857 · Cited by 13
Effects of finger and mouse pointing on learning from online split‐attention examples
Zhang, S., de Koning, B. B., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12556 · Cited by 15
Belk, M., Germanakos, P., Fidas, C. A., Holzinger, A., & Samaras, G. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_26 · Cited by 13
Thomas, E. H. X., Maruff, P. T., Paul, J. M., & Reeve, R. A. (2015) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2015.1038989 · Cited by 14
Nonverbal auditory working memory: Can music indicate the capacity?
Jeong, E., & Ryu, H. B. (2016) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.03.003 · Cited by 13
Synaptic efficacy shapes resource limitations in working memory
Krishnan, N. P., Poll, D. B., & Kilpatrick, Z. P. (2018) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-018-0679-7 · Cited by 13
Leveraging the Integrated Development Environment for Learning Analytics
Carter, A., Hundhausen, C. D., & Olivares, D. M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.024 · Cited by 13
Lian, Z., Feng, Z., Zhou, Z., Hu, C., Tang, S., & Wang, J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2025.3555835 · Cited by 12
Pu, K., Zhang, T., Sendhilnathan, N., Freitag, S., Sodhi, R., & Jonker, T. R. (2025) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3746059.3747770 · Cited by 22
Five Tips for Managing Diagrams in Anatomy Lecture: The Cognitive Load Theory Perspective
Hadie, S. N. H. (2020) · Education in Medicine Journal · doi:10.21315/eimj2020.12.3.8 · Cited by 12
Structured interviews: moving beyond mean validity…
Huffcutt, A. I., & Murphy, S. A. (2023) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2023.42 · Cited by 12
Cross-modal working memory binding and L1-L2 word learning
Wang, S., Allen, R., Fang, S.-Y., & Li, P. (2017) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0731-2 · Cited by 12
What Makes a UI Simple? Difficulty and Complexity in Tasks Engaging Visual-Spatial Working Memory
Bakaev, M., & Разумникова, О. М. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13010021 · Cited by 12
Investigating the Benefits of Integrated Anatomy Instruction: A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective
Talip, S. B., Ismail, Z. I. M., & Hadie, S. N. H. (2021) · Education in Medicine Journal · doi:10.21315/eimj2021.13.3.1 · Cited by 13
Improving Learning Environments: Avoiding Stupidity Perspective
Pelánek, R., & Effenberger, T. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2022.3154936 · Cited by 12
Sloth bear attacks: regional differences and safety messaging
Sharp, T. R., Smith, T. S., Swaminathan, S., & Arun, A. S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07974-y · Cited by 12
Forsberg, A., Guitard, D., Greene, N. R., Naveh‐Benjamin, M., & Cowan, N. (2022) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000703 · Cited by 12
Self-citationA matter of availability: sharper tuning for memorized than for perceived stimulus features
Chota, S., Gayet, S., Kenemans, J. L., Olivers, C. N. L., & der Stigchel, S. V. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad064 · Cited by 12
Letter and Colour Matching Tasks: Parametric Measures of Developmental Working Memory Capacity
Powell, T. L., Arsalidou, M., Vogan, V. M., & Taylor, M. J. (2014) · Child Development Research · doi:10.1155/2014/961781 · Cited by 12
Cognitive functions and human error
Kanki, B. G. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-101869-9.00002-9 · Cited by 14
Guillory, S. B., Gliga, T., & Káldy, Z. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.10.005 · Cited by 12
Brady, R. J., & Hampton, R. R. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.012 · Cited by 12
da Silva, C. F., Victorino, C. G., Caticha, N., & Baldo, M. V. C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15587-z · Cited by 18
Cognitive control of working memory but not familiarity in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)
Brown, E. K., & Hampton, R. R. (2020) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-020-00432-7 · Cited by 12
ANOVA-MOP: ANOVA Decomposition for Multiobjective Optimization
Tabatabaei, M., Lovison, A., Tan, M. H. Y., Hartikainen, M. E., & Miettinen, K. (2018) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/16m1096505 · Cited by 12
Teacher Knowledge for Inclusive Computing Learning
Goode, J., & Ryoo, J. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.025 · Cited by 12
Poll, G. H., & Miller, C. (2021) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716421000011 · Cited by 11
Evaluation of children’s cognitive load in processing and storage of their spatial working memory
Chen, H.-C., Kao, C., Wang, T., & Lai, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918048 · Cited by 11
Ede, J., Hutton, R. J. B., Watkinson, P., Kent, B., & Endacott, R. (2023) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104671 · Cited by 11
Late positive slow waves as markers of chunking during encoding
Nogueira, A. M. L., Bueno, O. F. A., Manzano, G. M., Kohn, A. F., & Pompéia, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01032 · Cited by 11
Sasin, E. M., & Nieuwenstein, M. R. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1041-6 · Cited by 11
Dyslexia Limits the Ability to Categorize Talker Dialect
Long, G., Fox, R. A., & Jacewicz, E. (2016) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-s-15-0106 · Cited by 11
Li, S. Y. W., Tse, M.-K., Brecknell, B., & Sanderson, P. M. (2018) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720818797502 · Cited by 11
Current controversies in the cognitive science of short-term memory
Shevlin, H. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.02.005 · Cited by 12
Overview of Active Learning Research and Rationale for Active Learning
Huggett, K. N., & Jeffries, W. B. (2021) · IAMSE manuals · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62916-8_1 · Cited by 11
Decision Support Systems in HF based on Deep Learning Technologies
Penso, M., Solbiati, S., Moccia, S., & Caiani, E. G. (2022) · Current Heart Failure Reports · doi:10.1007/s11897-022-00540-7 · Cited by 12
Morality in the time of cognitive famine: The effects of memory load on cooperation and honesty
Mitkidis, P., Lindeløv, J. K., Elbæk, C. T., Porubanová, M., Grzymała-Moszczyńska, J., & Ariely, D. (2022) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103664 · Cited by 11
Autistic traits are associated with enhanced working memory capacity for abstract visual stimuli
Brown, L. A., & Stewart, M. E. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103905 · Cited by 11
Scharinger, C. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4087 · Cited by 11
Rebholz, T. R., Biella, M., & Hütter, M. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2369 · Cited by 11
Grouping, semantic relation and imagery effects in individuals with Down syndrome
Smith, E., & Jarrold, C. (2014) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.061 · Cited by 11
Exploring customer specific KPI selection strategies for an adaptive time critical user interface
Keck, I. R., & Ross, R. (2014) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/2557500.2557536 · Cited by 11
Modeling Interruption and Resumption in a Smartphone Task: An ACT-R Approach
Wirzberger, M., & Rußwinkel, N. (2015) · i-com · doi:10.1515/icom-2015-0033 · Cited by 11
When high working memory capacity is and is not beneficial for predicting nonlinear processes
Fischer, H., & Holt, D. V. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0665-0 · Cited by 11
Olivers, C. N. L., Awh, E., & der Burg, E. V. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000268 · Cited by 11
Wilcock, R. A., Crane, L., Hobson, Z., Nash, G., Kirke‐Smith, M., & Henry, L. A. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3412 · Cited by 11
The (lack of) effect of dynamic visual noise on the concreteness effect in short-term memory
Castellà, J., & Campoy, G. (2018) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1476550 · Cited by 11
A Hand Gesture Set for Navigating and Interacting with 3D Virtual Environments
Sampson, H., Kelly, D., Wünsche, B. C., & Amor, R. (2018) · International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ) · doi:10.1109/ivcnz.2018.8634656 · Cited by 11
The effect of sexual arousal and emotional arousal on working memory
Au, R. K. C., & Tang, V. K. Y. (2019) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2019.1645260 · Cited by 11
Impaired Recent Verbal Memory in Pornography-Addicted Juvenile Subjects
Prawiroharjo, P., Ellydar, H., Pratama, P., Edison, R. E., Suaidy, S. E. I., Amani, N. Z., & Carissima, D. (2019) · Neurology Research International · doi:10.1155/2019/2351638 · Cited by 11
Exploring the influence of temporal factors on age differences in working memory dual task costs.
Rhodes, S., Doherty, J. M., Graham, A. J., Forsberg, A., Belletier, C., Naveh‐Benjamin, M., Cowan, N., Barrouillet, P., Camos, V., & Logie, R. H. (2021) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000531 · Cited by 11
Self-citationInter- and Intra-Hemispheric Age-Related Remodeling in Visuo-Spatial Working Memory
Tagliabue, C. F., Varesio, G., & Mazza, V. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.807907 · Cited by 11
Working memory capacity estimates moderate value learning for outcome-irrelevant features
Ben-Artzi, I., Luria, R., & Shahar, N. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21832-x · Cited by 11
Wirzberger, M., Beege, M., Schneider, S., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.010 · Cited by 11
Rodríguez, R., & Pattini, A. (2012) · LEUKOS The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America · doi:10.1582/leukos.2012.08.04.003 · Cited by 11
Tunable synaptic working memory with volatile memristive devices
Ricci, S., Kappel, D., Tetzlaff, C., Ielmini, D., & Covi, E. (2023) · Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering · doi:10.1088/2634-4386/ad01d6 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowan, Nelson
- ORCID
- Cowan, Nelson
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2864034
- OpenAlex
- W2134598164
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f52d0f7bdb639a9ea900f7d1fecb39468358b00
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021338)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, storage capacity, short-term memory, individual differences, memory span
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
