The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Magical Mystery Four: How Is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?
Open accessAbstract
Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed. The ability to repeat information depends on task demands but can be distinguished from a more constant, underlying mechanism: a central memory store limited to 3 to 5 meaningful items for young adults. I discuss why this central limit is important, how it can be observed, how it differs among individuals, and why it may exist.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cowan argues that working memory has a central storage limit of about 3–5 meaningful items or chunks in young adults, observable when rehearsal, grouping, and sensory memory are controlled. The limit predicts thought and individual differences, but its underlying reasons remain unresolved.
Key findings
- A central working memory store is limited to about 3–5 chunks in young adults; in running span, only the last 3–5 digits can be recalled, and with rehearsal prevented individuals remembered only about 3 units whether items were singletons or learned pairs.
- In a dual-modality array task, people remembered about 4 squares when attending only to squares; when attending to both squares and spoken digits, they remembered fewer squares but about 4 items in all, but only when a mask wiped out sensory memory.
- Age differences appeared in storage: 7-year-olds stored about 1.5 items versus about 3.0 for older children or adults; the attention advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults when the total field was small (4 items).
- Proposed explanations split into capacity limits as weaknesses (neural timing, interference, or neuron limits) versus strengths (efficient search, chunking, and learning imperfect rules).
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis of prior behavioral studies; no new primary experiment is reported.
- Describes tasks including running span, brief simultaneous spatial arrays, unattended auditory input, articulatory suppression, paired-word chunk learning, and visual/auditory dual arrays with masks and attention conditions.
- Capacity was estimated using a hit/false-alarm formula (Cowan, 2001), with comparisons across age, attention, modality, and chunk type.
Limitations
- Stated: the reasons for the central 3–5 chunk limit remain unclear; the hypotheses are not necessarily incompatible; and precise predictions cannot yet be made for every possible task.
- Stated: some key cited results were in press at the time (e.g., Chen & Cowan; Cowan et al.), limiting available detail.
- Evident: as a review, the conclusions depend on selected prior studies and task-specific controls, with no formal meta-analysis or new data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
25 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 3 Own result
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan et al., in press
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when verbal rehearsal was prevented by having the participant repeat the word “the” throughout the trial, individuals remembered only about 3 units, no matter whether those were singletons or learned pairs.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen and Cowan (in press)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young adults can recall 3 to 5 chunks from a presented list no matter whether these are learned pairs or singletons.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults, provided that the total number of items in the field was small (4).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundary conditions are also of practical use to predict performance when the material is too brief, long, or complex to allow processing strategies such as rehearsal or grouping.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This fixed capacity limit was obtained, though, only if the items to be recalled were followed by a jumble of meaningless, mixed visual and acoustic stimuli (a mask) so that sensory memory would be wiped out and the measure of working memory would be limited to central memory.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tests of working memory demonstrate practical limits that vary, depending on whether the test circumstances allow processes such as grouping or rehearsal, focusing of attention on just the material relevant to the task, and the use of modality- or material-specific stores to supplement a central store.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies indicate that working memory capacity varies among people, predicts individual differences in intellectual ability, and changes across the life span (Cowan, 2005).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Working memory is used in mental tasks, such as language comprehension (for example, retaining ideas from early in a sentence to be combined with ideas later on), problem solving (in arithmetic, carrying a digit from the ones to the tens column while remembering the numbers), and planning (determining the best order in which to visit the bank, library, and grocery).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was also an advantage for the test of the shape to be remembered, compared to the shape to be ignored; attention helped greatly.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage-specific capacity is a more analytic concept and stays constant across a much wider variety of circumstances.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some ways, the existing limits may be ideal, or nearly so, for humans.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are probably factors of biological economy limiting central capacity”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The reasons for the central working memory storage limit of 3–5 chunks remain unclear but Cowan (2005) reviewed a variety of hypotheses.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > WHY THE STORAGE CAPACITY LIMIT?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“if they were asked to attend to both squares and digits, they could remember fewer squares, but about 4 items in all.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That central memory is especially important because it underlies problem-solving and abstract thought.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Other work suggests that storage and processing capacities both make important, partly separate and partly overlapping contributions to intelligence and development (Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recall limit is important because it measures what is termed working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960), the few temporarily active thoughts.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“He demonstrated that one can repeat back a list of no more than about seven randomly ordered, meaningful items or chunks”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller (1956)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.
“Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, the limited processing capacity of a learner's working memory (WM) is considered a bottleneck (Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956); for new, yet to be learned information, its processing capacity is limited to only 4±1 elements (Cowan 2010)”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Cowan 2010
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Self-citationPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Brown, R. W. (1960) · Language · doi:10.2307/411065 · Cited by 3,525
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
Baddeley, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · Cited by 2,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04171 · Cited by 1,367
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 977
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
Perceptually Discriminating Chunks in Business Process Models
Stark, J., Braun, R., & Esswein, W. (2016) · IEEE Conference on Business Informatics · doi:10.1109/cbi.2016.18 · Cited by 3
Memory demands in linguistic compensation
Medimorec, S., Mander, C., & Risko, E. F. (2017) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1311353 · Cited by 3
The Simple Memory Span Experiment: A Behavioral Analysis
Bachelder, B. L., & Delprato, D. J. (2017) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-017-0222-7 · Cited by 3
Multi-layer Big Knowledge Visualization Scheme for Comprehending Neoplasm Ontology Content
Zheng, L., Ochs, C., Geller, J., Liu, H., Perl, Y., & de Coronado, S. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK) · doi:10.1109/icbk.2017.40 · Cited by 3
Castiglione, D. (2020) · Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego eBooks · doi:10.31338/uw.9788323543800.pp.43-80 · Cited by 3
Bauer, P. J., & Dugan, J. A. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814411-4.00018-4 · Cited by 3
Phonological span in children and adults: Does response format matter?
Oesterlen, E., & Seitz-Stein, K. (2019) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025419840709 · Cited by 3
Enhancing Students’ Laboratory Experiences in Undergraduate Chemistry
Lamichhane, R., & Maltese, A. V. (2019) · ACS symposium series · doi:10.1021/bk-2019-1318.ch006 · Cited by 3
Workload-Aware Systems and Interfaces for Cognitive Augmentation
Kosch, T. (2020) · Elektronische Hochschulschriften der LMU München (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07703 · Cited by 3
An Interpretable Algorithm for Uveal Melanoma Subtyping from Whole Slide Cytology ImagesPreprint
Chen, H., Liu, T. Y. A., Gómez, C., Corrêa, Z. M., & Unberath, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.06246 · Cited by 3
Toward a Theory of Programming Language and Reasoning Assistant Design: Minimizing Cognitive LoadPreprint
Coblenz, M. J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03806 · Cited by 3
Winners and losers - communicating the potential impacts of policiesPreprint
Brick, C., Skylark, W. J., Freeman, A. L. J., & Marteau, T. M. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/d8rfy · Cited by 3
Bayesian Advice Taking: Adaptive Strategy Selection in Sequential Advice SeekingPreprint
Rebholz, T. R., Hütter, M., & Voß, A. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/y8x92 · Cited by 3
Statistical learning biases working memory maintenance.Preprint
Haines, O., Owens, K., Nobre, A. C., Draschkow, D., & Boettcher, S. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vrq2c · Cited by 3
When should one be open-minded?
Duijf, H. (2024) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-024-02137-3 · Cited by 2
The Role of Working Memory Capacity in L2 Vocabulary Learning Among Saudi EFL Students
Alshehri, N. (2024) · Journal for the Study of English Linguistics · doi:10.5296/jsel.v12i1.22242 · Cited by 2
A neurocognitive mechanism for increased cooperation during group formation
Zajkowski, W. K., Badman, R. P., Haruno, M., & Akaishi, R. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00177-3 · Cited by 2
Mnemonics, Chunking, and Mind Mapping in Enhancing the Perceived Memory of Nursing Students
Sankar, C., VasanthaNila, M., Nandakumar, S., Neelakandan, P., & Suresh, G. (2025) · International journal of Nutrition Pharmacology Neurological Diseases · doi:10.4103/ijnpnd.ijnpnd_32_25 · Cited by 3
Dönmez, S., Şener, A., Işık, N. İ., Koca, S., & Akbaş, İ. (2025) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.04.032 · Cited by 2
Working Memory Skills in the Preschool Period
Karadeniz, S. A. (2025) · Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.46778/goputeb.1668229 · Cited by 2
Surwanti, D., Loyens, S. M. M., Burke, M., Hikmah, I., Gemilang, A. V., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15101392 · Cited by 2
Low-regret strategies for energy systems planning in a highly uncertain future
Wiest, G., Nolzen, N., Baader, F. J., Bardow, A., & Moret, S. (2025) · Cell Reports Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100585 · Cited by 2
Retrieving on a topic graph for long document question answering
Chen, S., Liang, B., Yu, Y., Wong, K., Wang, H., & Xu, R. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.132447 · Cited by 2
Hawani, A., Tannoubi, A., Gasmi, M., Ursu, V. E., & Geantă, V. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2025.1736195 · Cited by 2
Generalized Technology Readiness Level Scale for Measuring Technology Maturity
Townes, M. S. (2026) · Journal of Research Management and Administration · doi:10.18552/jorma.v5i1.1285 · Cited by 2
Robust incremental learning of visual concepts without catastrophic forgetting
Barari, N., Lian, X., & MacLellan, C. J. (2026) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2026.101447 · Cited by 4
Rizvi, S. W. F., Yankouskaya, A., Alshakhsi, S. A. A., Al‐Thani, D., & Ali, R. (2025) · International Conference on Foundation and Large Language Models (FLLM) · doi:10.1109/fllm67465.2025.11391082 · Cited by 2
Islam, M. Z., Hossain, A., & Talukder, R. M. (2026) · Pharmacy Education · doi:10.46542/pe.2026.261.116126 · Cited by 2
Syntactic and Prosodic Phrasal Alignment in Naturalistic Language
Bannon, J., Hlachova, B., & Ferreira, F. (2026) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70224 · Cited by 2
Explaining individual differences in children’s vocabulary growth
Rowland, C. F., Jones, G., Peter, M., Bidgood, A., Jessop, A., Durrant, S., Stinson, P., & Pine, J. M. (2026) · Trends in language acquisition research · doi:10.1075/tilar.35.04row · Cited by 2
Unload the load: Optimizing anatomy instruction with cognitive load theory
Rizvi, F. A., Choudhury, B., Bakar, Y. I. A., Ghani, A. S. A., Talip, S. B., & Hadie, S. N. H. (2026) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.70266 · Cited by 2
Goetz, T., Stoll, S. E. M., Adam, C. A., Bieleke, M., Frenzel, A. C., Fries, J., Kraiger, L., Stempfer, L., Yanagida, T., & Pekrun, R. H. (2026) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0001045 · Cited by 3
Peng, C.-C., Lin, C., Woo, P., Tai, H. C.-H., & Feng, C. (2016) · Diagnosis · doi:10.1515/dx-2016-0017 · Cited by 2
Charting the trajectory of forgetting: Insights from a working memory period paradigm
Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., & Horton, N. J. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00916-6 · Cited by 2
Construction of The Arabic Phonological Short Term Memory Test on Egyptian Children
ElNeshwey, H. M., Baraka, M. A. S., Rifaie, N. A. A., Saber, A. S., & Sarwat, S. A. (2018) · The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.21608/ejhm.2018.10166 · Cited by 2
The Role of Attention, Executive Processes, and Memory in Aesthetic Experience
Mullennix, J. W. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198824350.013.35 · Cited by 2
Nador, J., Harel, A., Juvina, I., & Minnery, B. S. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01566 · Cited by 3
Working memory for emotions in adolescents and young adults with traumatic brain injury
Byom, L. J., Whaln, M. S., & Turkstra, L. S. (2021) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1017/brimp.2021.20 · Cited by 2
The linguistic constraints of precision of verbal working memory
Bouffier, M., Poncelet, M., & Majerus, S. (2022) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-022-01283-5 · Cited by 2
Szewczyk, M., Augustynowicz, P., & Szubielska, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.974791 · Cited by 2
Turnbull, M. M., MacRoy‐Higgins, M., & Martin, B. A. (2023) · Communication Disorders Quarterly · doi:10.1177/15257401231181905 · Cited by 2
Incidental graphical perception: How marks and display time influence accuracy
Moreira, J., Mendes, D., & Gonçalves, D. J. V. (2023) · Information Visualization · doi:10.1177/14738716231189218 · Cited by 2
Anugrah, T., Sumaryanti, S., Ambardini, R. L., Nugroho, S., Sutapa, P., Arovah, N. I., & Simatupang, N. (2024) · Retos · doi:10.47197/retos.v58.102542 · Cited by 2
Hijacking limitations of working memory load to test for composition in language
Ullman, M. T., Bulut, T., & Walenski, M. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105875 · Cited by 2
Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of learning and memory
Marhenke, R. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99727-0.00003-3 · Cited by 2
Parsons Problems for Equivalence Proofs in Logic
van den Berg, M., Heeren, B. J., & Rahimi, E. (2024) · Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3699538.3699551 · Cited by 2
Novel Colors in Packaging: Boosting Consumers Learning Through Greater Expectation Violation
Lin, X., Ji, S., Liu, M., & Huang, J. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2444 · Cited by 2
Adaptive Technologies for Aging Populations
Turcas, N., Anderson, J. A. E., & West, R. L. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92970-0_9 · Cited by 2
Sex differences in visual working memory processing dynamics
Gonzalez-Garrido, A. A., Ávila-Garibay, A., Woltering, S., Gómez-Velázquez, F. R., & Gallardo‐Moreno, G. B. (2026) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2026.116127 · Cited by 2
Improving the Security of Mobile Devices Through Multi-Dimensional and Analog Authentication
Gurary, J. (2018) · EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University) · Cited by 2
Boonchutima, S., & Sahakitpijarn, K. (2022) · Fashion Style & Popular Culture · doi:10.1386/fspc_00152_1 · Cited by 2
Will Artificial Intelligence Take Over Human Writer?
Kojima, A. (2024) · Science Insights · doi:10.15354/si.24.co160 · Cited by 2
Working memory load recognition with deep learning time series classification
Pang, R.-D., Sang, H., Yi, L., Gao, C., Xu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, L., & Sun, J. (2024) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.516063 · Cited by 2
Gullberg, K., Johansson, V., & Johansson, R. (2024) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages9030085 · Cited by 2
The effect of color on license plate recall
Johnson, H. R., Scofield, J. E., & Kostic, B. N. (2024) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104279 · Cited by 2
Evocation of the self: self-defining mental photographs
Nourkova, V. V., & Sulim, O. S. (2023) · Etnograficheskoe obozrenie · doi:10.31857/s0869541523060052 · Cited by 2
Decoding load or selection in visuospatial working memory?
Tortajada, M., Fahrenfort, J. J., Sandoval‐Lentisco, A., Martínez‐Pérez, V., Palmero, L. B., Castillo, A., Fuentes, L. J., Campoy, G., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2024) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14636 · Cited by 2
Baker, A. A. (2025) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.70038 · Cited by 3
Toward Conscious Service Robots
Behnke, S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93623-4_13 · Cited by 2
Attentional Control and Retrieval Induced Forgetting Self-regulation Perspective
Kolańczyk, A., Reszko, M., & Mordasiewicz, P. (2013) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.2478/ppb-2013-0007 · Cited by 2
Cohen, A. L., Rotello, C. M., & Fiorenzo, L. M. (2014) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000029 · Cited by 2
Tindle, R., & Longstaff, M. G. (2016) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.003 · Cited by 2
Sasaki, K., & Inoue, T. (2019) · Mobile Information Systems · doi:10.1155/2019/4545917 · Cited by 2
The Generalizability of Dual N-Back Training in Younger Adults
Heffernan, A. L. (2014) · DalSpace (Dalhousie University) · Cited by 2
Mallik, P. R., Metzger, M. M., Loucks, A. M., Jardin, E., Bielawski, M., Clinger, N., Rasmus, L., & Jurosic, B. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2022.2055043 · Cited by 2
A normative comparison of threshold views through computer simulations
Huang, A. C. W. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03784-x · Cited by 2
Mutual interference in working memory updating: A hierarchical Bayesian model
Chen, Y., Peruggia, M., & Zandt, T. V. (2022) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2022.102706 · Cited by 2
Using more native-like language acquisition processes in the foreign language classroom
Green, K. (2018) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2018.1429134 · Cited by 2
Chakraborty, N., & Mondal, S. (2018) · IET Information Security · doi:10.1049/iet-ifs.2017.0538 · Cited by 2
Deck, S. L., Powell, M. B., Goodman‐Delahunty, J., & Westera, N. J. (2022) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2022.2057106 · Cited by 2
A Self-Organizing Short-Term Dynamical Memory NetworkPreprint
Federer, C., & Zylberberg, J. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/144683 · Cited by 2
Fernandes, T. J. (2018) · doi:10.14393/ufu.di.2018.513 · Cited by 2
Sama, M. A. (2017) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 2
Fay, N., Kleine, N. D., Walker, B., & Caldwell, C. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1911176116 · Cited by 2
Rohde, P. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9cfw3 · Cited by 2
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108894333.007 · Cited by 3
The Application of Metacognition to Business Decision Making
Turner-Walker, E. (2016) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17019569 · Cited by 2
Refreshing and Removing Items in Working Memory: Different Approaches to Equivalent Processes?Preprint
Lintz, E. N., & Johnson, M. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/z52vf · Cited by 2
Cognition-centered design principles for digital assessment tasks and items
Keehner, M., Arslan, B., & Lindner, M. A. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.10025-9 · Cited by 3
Synaptic Theory of Chunking in Working MemoryPreprint
Zhong, W., Katkov, M., & Tsodyks, M. V. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.08.14.607952 · Cited by 3
On the limit: Working memory capacity constrains learning of complex visuomotor mappingsPreprint
Bejjanki, V. R., & Taylor, J. A. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.30.702906 · Cited by 2
Hadie, S. N. H., Asari, M. A., Kasim, F., Yusof, N. A. M., Simok, A. A., Shamsuddin, S. A., Amin, M. S. I. M., Mukhtar, S. F., & Ismail, Z. I. M. (2023) · Education in Medicine Journal · doi:10.21315/eimj2023.15.1.9 · Cited by 3
Accuracy of the Formation of Spatial Representations of Dynamic Scenes in Working Memory
Saveleva, O. A., Menshikova, G. Y., & Bugriy, G. S. (2023) · Experimental Psychology (Russia) · doi:10.17759/exppsy.2023160404 · Cited by 1
Gestures in Cognition: Actions that Bridge the Mind and the World
Alibali, M. W., & Hostetter, A. B. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108638869.020 · Cited by 1
Canavese, P., & Mori, L. Y. (2024) · Comparative Legilinguistics · doi:10.14746/cl.2024.58.3 · Cited by 1
Du, C., Sun, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, Q., & Zeng, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2025.1534839 · Cited by 1
Moon, B., Bourdage, J. S., & Roulin, N. (2025) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-025-10042-7 · Cited by 1
Ethics trumps resources in women’s and men’s evaluations of potential mates and competitors
Karthikeyan, S., Aung, T., & Fisher, M. L. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-06611-8 · Cited by 1
Chen, J., Li, Q., Tao, H., Xu, C., Gao, Y., Yang, J., & Wu, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1594306 · Cited by 1
Improving Performance during Image-Guided Procedures: A Human Factors Perspective
Duncan, J. R., Berg, J. J., & Cao, C. G. L. (2025) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2025.07.025 · Cited by 1
Körner, S., Staller, M. S., & Zaiser, B. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-48196-4_6 · Cited by 1
Load-Dependent Retrospective Attentional Benefits During Visual Working Memory
Hu, Y., Yuan, X., Li, Y., Kong, Y., Huang, J., Song, Y., & Li, D. (2025) · Neuroscience Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s12264-025-01556-4 · Cited by 1
Attention Control and Working Memory, Varying Definitions and Measurements
Byrnes, D., & Was, C. A. (2026) · International Journal of Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijcs2010004 · Cited by 1
Cheng, C. (2026) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.70096 · Cited by 1
Altıntaş, M., ŞANLI, A., & ODACI, D. (2026) · 3 SEKTÖR SOSYAL EKONOMİ DERGİSİ · doi:10.63556/tisej.2026.1811 · Cited by 1
The role of load reduction instruction in assisting students with weak mental imagery
Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., Pearson, J., Kennett, R., & Burns, E. C. (2026) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102913 · Cited by 1
Teng, M. F., & Yin, F. (. (2026) · Computers & Education X Reality · doi:10.1016/j.cexr.2026.100168 · Cited by 1
Liang, H., Li, Q., Wang, L., Chi, C.-F., Zhang, Y., & Ng, K. K. H. (2026) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2026.105081 · Cited by 1
AEED: Agentic Edge-AI Engagement Detection for K-12 Classrooms
Arnold, I., Burch, E., Zha, S., Shelley-Tremblay, J. F., & Gong, N. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2026.3724409 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowan, Nelson
- ORCID
- Cowan, Nelson
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2864034
- OpenAlex
- W2134598164
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f52d0f7bdb639a9ea900f7d1fecb39468358b00
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021338)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, storage capacity, short-term memory, individual differences, memory span
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
