The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Magical Mystery Four: How Is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?
Open accessAbstract
Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed. The ability to repeat information depends on task demands but can be distinguished from a more constant, underlying mechanism: a central memory store limited to 3 to 5 meaningful items for young adults. I discuss why this central limit is important, how it can be observed, how it differs among individuals, and why it may exist.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cowan argues that working memory has a central storage limit of about 3–5 meaningful items or chunks in young adults, observable when rehearsal, grouping, and sensory memory are controlled. The limit predicts thought and individual differences, but its underlying reasons remain unresolved.
Key findings
- A central working memory store is limited to about 3–5 chunks in young adults; in running span, only the last 3–5 digits can be recalled, and with rehearsal prevented individuals remembered only about 3 units whether items were singletons or learned pairs.
- In a dual-modality array task, people remembered about 4 squares when attending only to squares; when attending to both squares and spoken digits, they remembered fewer squares but about 4 items in all, but only when a mask wiped out sensory memory.
- Age differences appeared in storage: 7-year-olds stored about 1.5 items versus about 3.0 for older children or adults; the attention advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults when the total field was small (4 items).
- Proposed explanations split into capacity limits as weaknesses (neural timing, interference, or neuron limits) versus strengths (efficient search, chunking, and learning imperfect rules).
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis of prior behavioral studies; no new primary experiment is reported.
- Describes tasks including running span, brief simultaneous spatial arrays, unattended auditory input, articulatory suppression, paired-word chunk learning, and visual/auditory dual arrays with masks and attention conditions.
- Capacity was estimated using a hit/false-alarm formula (Cowan, 2001), with comparisons across age, attention, modality, and chunk type.
Limitations
- Stated: the reasons for the central 3–5 chunk limit remain unclear; the hypotheses are not necessarily incompatible; and precise predictions cannot yet be made for every possible task.
- Stated: some key cited results were in press at the time (e.g., Chen & Cowan; Cowan et al.), limiting available detail.
- Evident: as a review, the conclusions depend on selected prior studies and task-specific controls, with no formal meta-analysis or new data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
25 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 3 Own result
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan et al., in press
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when verbal rehearsal was prevented by having the participant repeat the word “the” throughout the trial, individuals remembered only about 3 units, no matter whether those were singletons or learned pairs.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen and Cowan (in press)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young adults can recall 3 to 5 chunks from a presented list no matter whether these are learned pairs or singletons.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults, provided that the total number of items in the field was small (4).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundary conditions are also of practical use to predict performance when the material is too brief, long, or complex to allow processing strategies such as rehearsal or grouping.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This fixed capacity limit was obtained, though, only if the items to be recalled were followed by a jumble of meaningless, mixed visual and acoustic stimuli (a mask) so that sensory memory would be wiped out and the measure of working memory would be limited to central memory.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tests of working memory demonstrate practical limits that vary, depending on whether the test circumstances allow processes such as grouping or rehearsal, focusing of attention on just the material relevant to the task, and the use of modality- or material-specific stores to supplement a central store.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies indicate that working memory capacity varies among people, predicts individual differences in intellectual ability, and changes across the life span (Cowan, 2005).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Working memory is used in mental tasks, such as language comprehension (for example, retaining ideas from early in a sentence to be combined with ideas later on), problem solving (in arithmetic, carrying a digit from the ones to the tens column while remembering the numbers), and planning (determining the best order in which to visit the bank, library, and grocery).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was also an advantage for the test of the shape to be remembered, compared to the shape to be ignored; attention helped greatly.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage-specific capacity is a more analytic concept and stays constant across a much wider variety of circumstances.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some ways, the existing limits may be ideal, or nearly so, for humans.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are probably factors of biological economy limiting central capacity”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The reasons for the central working memory storage limit of 3–5 chunks remain unclear but Cowan (2005) reviewed a variety of hypotheses.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > WHY THE STORAGE CAPACITY LIMIT?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“if they were asked to attend to both squares and digits, they could remember fewer squares, but about 4 items in all.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That central memory is especially important because it underlies problem-solving and abstract thought.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Other work suggests that storage and processing capacities both make important, partly separate and partly overlapping contributions to intelligence and development (Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recall limit is important because it measures what is termed working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960), the few temporarily active thoughts.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“He demonstrated that one can repeat back a list of no more than about seven randomly ordered, meaningful items or chunks”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller (1956)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.
“Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, the limited processing capacity of a learner's working memory (WM) is considered a bottleneck (Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956); for new, yet to be learned information, its processing capacity is limited to only 4±1 elements (Cowan 2010)”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Cowan 2010
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Self-citationPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Brown, R. W. (1960) · Language · doi:10.2307/411065 · Cited by 3,525
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
Baddeley, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · Cited by 2,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04171 · Cited by 1,367
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 977
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,000
The Origins of a Spontaneous Thought: EEG Correlates and Thinkers’ Source Attributions
Godwin, C. A., Morsella, E., & Geisler, M. W. (2016) · AIMS neuroscience · doi:10.3934/neuroscience.2016.2.203 · Cited by 7
Li, Y., Mo, L., Wang, X., & Yu, M. (2017) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2017.1390515 · Cited by 7
Um framework de classificação de complexidade para infográficos
Lyra, K. T., Reis, R. C. D., Cruz, W. M., & Isotani, S. (2019) · Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação · doi:10.5753/rbie.2019.27.01.196 · Cited by 7
Karami, A. (2021) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2021.1891613 · Cited by 9
Does perceptual grouping improve visuospatial working memory? Optimized processing or encoding bias
Prieto, A., Peinado, V., & Mayas, J. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01555-w · Cited by 7
Commentary 2: knowledge integration in mathematics learning: the case of inversion
Schneider, M. (2011) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9373-7 · Cited by 7
Self-Control in Cyberspace: Applying Dual Systems Theory to Digital Self-Control ToolsPreprint
Lyngs, U., Lukoff, K., Slovák, P., Binns, R., Slack, A., Inzlicht, M., Kleek, M. G. V., & Shadbolt, N. (2019) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/685tm · Cited by 8
No Evidence for an Object Working Memory Capacity Benefit with Extended Viewing TimePreprint
Quirk, C., Adam, K. C. S., & Vogel, E. K. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/pzy5q · Cited by 7
Cipriani, G. A., González‐García, C., Martín‐Arévalo, E., Lupiáñez, J., & Botta, F. (2024) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2024.2435652 · Cited by 6
Gao, J., Liang, S., Sun, S., & Wang, S. (2025) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875251341304 · Cited by 6
Time Series Information Visualization - A Review of Approaches and Tools
Ortigossa, E. S., Dias, F. F., do Nascimento, D. C., & Nonato, L. G. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3609404 · Cited by 6
Graf, B., Beinig, R., Schwickert, S., & Schischke, D. (2026) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2026.103045 · Cited by 7
Văduva, A., Șerban, C. L., Lăzureanu, C., Cornea, R. F., Viţa, O. C., Gheju, A., Jurescu, A., Mihai, I. M., Olteanu, G., Lupu, V., et al. (2020) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2041 · Cited by 6
Influence of Three Feedback Conditions on Performing a Swallow Motor Pattern in Healthy Adults
Galek, K. E., Bice, E. M., & Allen, K. (2022) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000525634 · Cited by 6
Wang, M., Yang, M., & Kyle, W. C. (2023) · Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research · doi:10.1186/s43031-023-00083-4 · Cited by 6
Sensory stimulation enhances visual working memory capacity
Pileckyte, I., & Soto‐Faraco, S. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00158-6 · Cited by 6
Optimising episodic encoding within segmented virtual contexts
Logie, M. R., & Donaldson, D. I. (2025) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2024.103807 · Cited by 6
Looks like SNARC spirit: Coexistence of short- and long-term associations between letters and space
Roth, L., Huber, J. F., Kronenthaler, S., van Dijck, J., Cipora, K., Butz, M. V., & Nuerk, H. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218251324437 · Cited by 6
Delaunay, J., Galárraga, L. A., Largouët, C., & van Berkel, N. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711011 · Cited by 6
Enhancing creativity with domain-specific design heuristics for digital product innovation
Jin, X., Dong, H., & Evans, M. (2025) · The Design Journal · doi:10.1080/14606925.2025.2496711 · Cited by 6
Toward personalized AI-powered recommender systems to support users’ daily music choice experiences
Shin, Y., Ranjan, K., Kowalski, M. C., & Yoon, J. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103574 · Cited by 6
The effects of aging on the working memory processes of multimodal information
Solesio‐Jofre, E., López-Frutos, J. M., Cashdollar, N. M., Aurtenetxe, S., de Ramón, I., & Maestú, F. (2016) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2016.1207749 · Cited by 9
Chunking to improve verbal forward spans in Korsakoff’s syndrome
Haj, M. E., Kessels, R. P. C., Urso, L., & Nandrino, J. (2018) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2018.1499023 · Cited by 6
Field study on visual and cognitive stressors in Visual Display Terminal office work
Rodriguez, R. G., Dumit, C., Rosso, R. D., Peterle, A., Staneloni, A., & Pattini, A. (2019) · Americanae (AECID Library) · doi:10.25762/k6rf-n252 · Cited by 6
Roussel, S. (2019) · Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité · doi:10.4000/apliut.7162 · Cited by 6
Bouffier, M., Barbu, C., & Majerus, S. (2020) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.525 · Cited by 6
Consumers’ ability to identify a surplus when returns to attributes are nonlinear
Lunn, P., & Somerville, J. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008391 · Cited by 6
Quantifying navigation complexity in transportation networks
Jiang, Z., Dong, L., Wu, L., & Liu, Y. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac126 · Cited by 7
Forgetting distractors in working memory: Removal or decay?
Werner, L. L. S., & Parks, C. M. (2022) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2022.104367 · Cited by 6
Ehlert, A., Poltz, N., Quandte, S., Kohn, J., Kucian, K., von Aster, M., & Esser, G. (2022) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence10030070 · Cited by 6
Wehrle, F. M., Furrer, M., Feldmann, M., Liamlahi, R., Naef, N., Tuura, R., Latal, B., & Huber, R. (2022) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2022.2140796 · Cited by 6
The effect of information content and length on name recollection
Etgar, A., Friedman, R., Haiman, S., Perez, D., & Feitelson, D. G. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) · doi:10.1145/3524610.3529159 · Cited by 6
Using iconic hand gestures in teaching a year 8 science lesson
Bentley, B., Walters, K., & Yates, G. C. R. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4052 · Cited by 6
Identifying Lines and Interpreting Vertical Jumps in Eye Tracking Studies of Reading Text and Code
Shamy, M., & Feitelson, D. G. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Applied Perception · doi:10.1145/3579357 · Cited by 6
Formica, S., Palenciano, A. F., Vermeylen, L., Myers, N. E., Braß, M., & González‐García, C. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105739 · Cited by 6
Memory model of information transmitted in absolute judgment
Nizami, L. (2011) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/03684921111117942 · Cited by 6
Intégration relationnelle en mémoire de travail et intelligence fluide chez l’enfant
Perret, P., Dauvier, B., Bailleux, C., & Thomachot, L. (2013) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.4074/s0003503313002030 · Cited by 7
The Influence of Story Context on a Working Memory Span Task
Schroeder, P. J., Copeland, D. E., & Bies-Hernandez, N. J. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.622047 · Cited by 6
Bevilacqua, A., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & Krigbaum, G. (2016) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.1177/0031512516633344 · Cited by 6
Instructional Strategy: Didactic Media Presentation to Optimize Student Learning
Schilling, J. F. (2017) · Athletic Training Education Journal · doi:10.4085/120151 · Cited by 6
Deficits in visual working-memory capacity and general cognition in African Americans with psychosis
Mathias, S. R., Knowles, E. E. M., Barrett, J., Beetham, T., Leach, O., Buccheri, S., Aberizk, K., Blangero, J., Poldrack, R. A., & Glahn, D. C. (2017) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.015 · Cited by 6
Ko, A. J., & Fincher, S. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.005 · Cited by 7
Lonsdale, D. J., & Lonsdale, M. D. S. (2019) · Intelligence & National Security · doi:10.1080/02684527.2019.1592841 · Cited by 6
Effects of visual short-term memory load and attentional demand on the contrast response function
Konstantinou, N., & Nilli Lavie, C. (2020) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.20.10.6 · Cited by 6
Compositional memory in attractor neural networks with one-step learning
Davis, G. P., Katz, G. E., Gentili, R. J., & Reggia, J. A. (2021) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2021.01.031 · Cited by 6
Procedural Control Versus Resources as Potential Origins of Human Hyper Selectivity
Ulrich Ansorge, A., Büsel, C., Forstinger, M., Gugerell, D., Grüner, M., Pomper, U., Stolte, M., Schmid, R. R., & Valuch, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718141 · Cited by 6
Krasnoff, J., & Souza, A. S. (2024) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-023-01514-3 · Cited by 6
Task set induces dynamic reallocation of resources in visual short-term memory
Sheremata, S., & Shomstein, S. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1181-8 · Cited by 6
Students As Teachers and Communicators
Simon, B., Hundhausen, C. D., McDowell, C., Werner, L., Hu, H. H., & Kussmaul, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.030 · Cited by 6
A novel practical pedagogy for terminal assessment
Hennah, N. (2018) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c8rp00186c · Cited by 6
Algorithmic Cognition and the Computational Nature of the Mind
Zenil, H., & Gauvrit, N. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_707-2 · Cited by 7
Fincher, S. A., & Robins, A. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.001 · Cited by 9
Tian, J., & Yang, W. (2024) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26110902 · Cited by 6
Integrating Virtual Reality, Chatbots, and BDI Agents: VEsNA Goes Fast!
Ferrando, A., Gatti, A., & Mascardi, V. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01082-7_11 · Cited by 5
Multi-Level Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Human-Centered AI
Schoenherr, J. R., & Michael, K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-8440-0_100-1 · Cited by 5
Zamanifar, M., & Hartmann, T. (2021) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-021-09824-0 · Cited by 5
Wang, Z., & Schroeder, N. L. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3932 · Cited by 6
Meng, L. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media · doi:10.54254/2753-7048/3/2022359 · Cited by 8
Reasoning More Efficiently with Primary Knowledge Despite Extraneous Cognitive Load
Lespiau, F., & Tricot, A. (2024) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/14747049241252694 · Cited by 8
Rowland, C. F., Bidgood, A., Jones, G., Jessop, A., Stinson, P., Pine, J. M., Durrant, S., & Peter, M. (2024) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12671 · Cited by 5
Search advantages for facing social groups reflect optimal interactive group sizes
Yan, L., Colombatto, C., & Ristic, J. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111105 · Cited by 5
Blischke, K., & Malangré, A. (2016) · Journal of Human Kinetics · doi:10.1515/hukin-2015-0163 · Cited by 6
Effects of Self-explanations as Scaffolding Tool for Learning Computer Programming
Garces, S., Ravai, G., Vieira, C., & Magana, A. J. (2019) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028561 · Cited by 5
Avital-Cohen, R., & Gronau, N. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000921 · Cited by 5
Gurubatham, M. R. (2023) · Palgrave studies in workplace spirituality and fulfillment · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05839-4_6 · Cited by 5
Comparison of semantic and phonological false memories in short- and long-term tests
Coane, J. H., McBride, D. M., Chang, K., Cam, Y., & Marsh, E. J. (2024) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241231575 · Cited by 5
Access to inner language enhances memory for events.
Banks, B., & Connell, L. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0001351 · Cited by 7
Sahar, T., Gronau, N., & Makovski, T. (2024) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-024-01611-x · Cited by 5
Gaze-based Augmented Reality Interfaces to Support Scalable Human-Robot Teaming
Petlowany, C., Pryor, M., & Hahn, N. (2024) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731399 · Cited by 5
Weinert, C., Maier, C., & Laumer, S. (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 5
Caregivers' memory for medical information: The effects of stress and the presence of a young child
Birtwell, K. B., & Sandberg, E. H. (2014) · Journal of Communications In Healthcare · doi:10.1179/1753807614y.0000000057 · Cited by 5
Relative frequency and the holistic processing of morphology
Heffernan, K., & Sato, Y. (2017) · Asia-Pacific Language Variation · doi:10.1075/aplv.3.1.04hef · Cited by 5
Trimmel, M., & Trimmel, K. (2017) · The Ergonomics Open Journal · doi:10.2174/1875934301710010014 · Cited by 5
Injoque‐Ricle, I., Barreyro, J. P., Formoso, J., & Brurin, D. I. (2018) · Temas em Psicologia · doi:10.9788/tp2018.1-16 · Cited by 5
Shell, D. F., & Flowerday, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316823279.032 · Cited by 5
The effect of memory load on object reconstruction: Insights from an online mouse-tracking task
Li, A. Y., Yuan, J. Y., Pun, C., & Barense, M. D. (2023) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-022-02650-9 · Cited by 6
Designing mathematics standards in agreement with science
Hartman, J. R., Hart, S., Nelson, E. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2023) · International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education · doi:10.29333/iejme/13179 · Cited by 9
Learning and Recalling Melodies
Silas, S. J., & Müllensiefen, D. (2023) · Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2023.41.2.77 · Cited by 5
Renaud, J. M., Al-Mallah, M. H., Soman, P., deKemp, R. A., Beanlands, R. S., Arumugam, P., Armstrong, I. S., Prior, J. O., Madamanchi, C., Goonewardena, S. N., et al. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.102023 · Cited by 5
Disrupted Working Memory Circuitry in Adolescent Psychosis
Eckfeld, A., Karlsgodt, K. H., Haut, K. M., Bachman, P., Jalbrzikowski, M., Zinberg, J. L., van Erp, T. G. M., Cannon, T. D., & Bearden, C. E. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00394 · Cited by 6
Data Visualization of Complex Information Through Mind Mapping in Spain and the European Union
Guerrero, J. M. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812443-7.00008-9 · Cited by 5
Judy, A. D. (2018) · SEU FIRE Scholars (Southeastern University) · Cited by 5
Davies, S. J., Bourke, L., & Harrison, N. (2019) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-019-09974-3 · Cited by 5
Optimal Real-time Scheduling of Human Attention for a Human and Multi-robot Collaboration System
Yao, N., & Zhang, F. (2020) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc45564.2020.9147782 · Cited by 5
Shen, Z., Ding, Y., Satel, J., & Wang, Z. (2020) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2020.1858215 · Cited by 5
Rappe, S. (2019) · Pragmatics & Cognition · doi:10.1075/pc.19001.rap · Cited by 5
Tamm, G., Kreegipuu, K., & Harro, J. (2021) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113255 · Cited by 5
Ward, R. T., Lotfi, S., Stout, D. M., Mattson, S., Lee, H., & Larson, C. L. (2021) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108091 · Cited by 5
Shared Memories Driven by the Intrinsic Memorability of Items
Bainbridge, W. A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81465-6_7 · Cited by 5
Carter, J. A., & Gordon, E. C. (2017) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2017.1285395 · Cited by 5
Memory skills mediating superior memory in a world-class memorist
Ericsson, K. A., Cheng, X., Pan, Y., Ku, Y., Ge, Y., & Hu, Y. (2017) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2017.1296164 · Cited by 5
Generative Music, Cognitive Modelling, and Computer-Assisted Composition in MusiCog and ManuScore
Maxwell, J. B. (2014) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.1159.9525 · Cited by 5
Nelson, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00085 · Cited by 5
Henry, L. A., Moran, A., & Messer, D. J. (2020) · The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/9781119171492.wecad116 · Cited by 5
Reflections on some key issues and challenges for marketing for social good
Badejo, A., Maclaran, P., Chatzidakis, A., Pettigrew, S., Gordon, R., Spotswood, F., & Dibb, S. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2022.2110702 · Cited by 5
Jessop, A., Pine, J. M., & Gobet, F. R. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dukpt · Cited by 5
Dynamic prioritization reshapes neural geometries for action in human working memoryPreprint
Padezhki, I., Domingo, J. L., & González‐García, C. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.18.665374 · Cited by 5
Retrospective judgments of confidence in a complex span task
Lau, G., Moulin, C. J. A., & Portrat, S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-45552-y · Cited by 5
Why More Biologists Must Embrace Quantitative Modeling
Milligan, B. G., & Rohde, A. T. (2024) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icae038 · Cited by 4
Does presentation size of instructional materials influence the split‐attention effect?
Zhang, S., de Koning, B. B., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4223 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowan, Nelson
- ORCID
- Cowan, Nelson
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2864034
- OpenAlex
- W2134598164
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f52d0f7bdb639a9ea900f7d1fecb39468358b00
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021338)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, storage capacity, short-term memory, individual differences, memory span
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
