The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Magical Mystery Four: How Is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?
Open accessAbstract
Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed. The ability to repeat information depends on task demands but can be distinguished from a more constant, underlying mechanism: a central memory store limited to 3 to 5 meaningful items for young adults. I discuss why this central limit is important, how it can be observed, how it differs among individuals, and why it may exist.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cowan argues that working memory has a central storage limit of about 3–5 meaningful items or chunks in young adults, observable when rehearsal, grouping, and sensory memory are controlled. The limit predicts thought and individual differences, but its underlying reasons remain unresolved.
Key findings
- A central working memory store is limited to about 3–5 chunks in young adults; in running span, only the last 3–5 digits can be recalled, and with rehearsal prevented individuals remembered only about 3 units whether items were singletons or learned pairs.
- In a dual-modality array task, people remembered about 4 squares when attending only to squares; when attending to both squares and spoken digits, they remembered fewer squares but about 4 items in all, but only when a mask wiped out sensory memory.
- Age differences appeared in storage: 7-year-olds stored about 1.5 items versus about 3.0 for older children or adults; the attention advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults when the total field was small (4 items).
- Proposed explanations split into capacity limits as weaknesses (neural timing, interference, or neuron limits) versus strengths (efficient search, chunking, and learning imperfect rules).
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis of prior behavioral studies; no new primary experiment is reported.
- Describes tasks including running span, brief simultaneous spatial arrays, unattended auditory input, articulatory suppression, paired-word chunk learning, and visual/auditory dual arrays with masks and attention conditions.
- Capacity was estimated using a hit/false-alarm formula (Cowan, 2001), with comparisons across age, attention, modality, and chunk type.
Limitations
- Stated: the reasons for the central 3–5 chunk limit remain unclear; the hypotheses are not necessarily incompatible; and precise predictions cannot yet be made for every possible task.
- Stated: some key cited results were in press at the time (e.g., Chen & Cowan; Cowan et al.), limiting available detail.
- Evident: as a review, the conclusions depend on selected prior studies and task-specific controls, with no formal meta-analysis or new data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
25 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 3 Own result
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan et al., in press
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when verbal rehearsal was prevented by having the participant repeat the word “the” throughout the trial, individuals remembered only about 3 units, no matter whether those were singletons or learned pairs.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen and Cowan (in press)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young adults can recall 3 to 5 chunks from a presented list no matter whether these are learned pairs or singletons.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults, provided that the total number of items in the field was small (4).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundary conditions are also of practical use to predict performance when the material is too brief, long, or complex to allow processing strategies such as rehearsal or grouping.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This fixed capacity limit was obtained, though, only if the items to be recalled were followed by a jumble of meaningless, mixed visual and acoustic stimuli (a mask) so that sensory memory would be wiped out and the measure of working memory would be limited to central memory.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tests of working memory demonstrate practical limits that vary, depending on whether the test circumstances allow processes such as grouping or rehearsal, focusing of attention on just the material relevant to the task, and the use of modality- or material-specific stores to supplement a central store.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies indicate that working memory capacity varies among people, predicts individual differences in intellectual ability, and changes across the life span (Cowan, 2005).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Working memory is used in mental tasks, such as language comprehension (for example, retaining ideas from early in a sentence to be combined with ideas later on), problem solving (in arithmetic, carrying a digit from the ones to the tens column while remembering the numbers), and planning (determining the best order in which to visit the bank, library, and grocery).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was also an advantage for the test of the shape to be remembered, compared to the shape to be ignored; attention helped greatly.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage-specific capacity is a more analytic concept and stays constant across a much wider variety of circumstances.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some ways, the existing limits may be ideal, or nearly so, for humans.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are probably factors of biological economy limiting central capacity”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The reasons for the central working memory storage limit of 3–5 chunks remain unclear but Cowan (2005) reviewed a variety of hypotheses.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > WHY THE STORAGE CAPACITY LIMIT?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“if they were asked to attend to both squares and digits, they could remember fewer squares, but about 4 items in all.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That central memory is especially important because it underlies problem-solving and abstract thought.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Other work suggests that storage and processing capacities both make important, partly separate and partly overlapping contributions to intelligence and development (Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recall limit is important because it measures what is termed working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960), the few temporarily active thoughts.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“He demonstrated that one can repeat back a list of no more than about seven randomly ordered, meaningful items or chunks”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller (1956)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.
“Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, the limited processing capacity of a learner's working memory (WM) is considered a bottleneck (Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956); for new, yet to be learned information, its processing capacity is limited to only 4±1 elements (Cowan 2010)”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Cowan 2010
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Self-citationPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Brown, R. W. (1960) · Language · doi:10.2307/411065 · Cited by 3,525
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
Baddeley, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · Cited by 2,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04171 · Cited by 1,367
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 977
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
Mental Imagery for Musical Changes in Loudness
Bailes, F., Bishop, L., Stevens, C., & Dean, R. T. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00525 · Cited by 23
Westbrook, A., van den Bosch, R., Hofmans, L., Papadopetraki, D., Määttä, J. I., Collins, A. G. E., Frank, M. J., & Cools, R. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61099-0 · Cited by 22
Under Pressure to Achieve? The Impact of Type and Style of Task Instructions on Student Cheating
Pulfrey, C., Vansteenkiste, M., & Michou, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01624 · Cited by 26
Just write it down: Similarity in the benefit from cognitive offloading in young and older adults
Burnett, L. K., & Richmond, L. L. (2023) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-023-01413-7 · Cited by 22
Augmented-Reality-Based Human Memory Enhancement Using Artificial Intelligence
Makhataeva, Z., Akhmetov, T., & Varol, H. A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2023.3307397 · Cited by 23
Sankalaite, S., Huizinga, M., Pollé, S., Xu, C., de Vries, N., Hens, E., & Baeyens, D. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13111149 · Cited by 35
Manrique, H. M., Read, D., & WALKER, M. J. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105543 · Cited by 23
Li, M., Zhang, B., Li, L., Sun, T., & Brown, A. (2024) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/10944281241229784 · Cited by 27
Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance
Chunharas, C., Rademaker, R. L., Sprague, T. C., Brady, T. F., & Serences, J. T. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.1.4 · Cited by 22
Mirkovski, K., Gaskin, J. E., Hull, D. M., & Lowry, P. B. (2019) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12240 · Cited by 22
Rational Adaptation in Lexical Prediction: The Influence of Prediction Strength
Ness, T., & Meltzer‐Asscher, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622873 · Cited by 23
Spatial encoding strategy theory: the relationship between spatial skill and STEM achievement
Margulieux, L. E. (2020) · ACM Inroads · doi:10.1145/3381891 · Cited by 24
The Associations Between Music Training, Musical Working Memory, and Visuospatial Working Memory
Silas, S. J., Müllensiefen, D., Gelding, R. W., Frieler, K., & Harrison, P. M. C. (2022) · Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2022.39.4.401 · Cited by 27
Developmental origins of recoding and decoding in memory
Kibbe, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2014) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.08.001 · Cited by 23
A suicidal mind tends to maintain less negative information in visual working memory
Xie, W., Li, H., Zou, Y.-M., Sun, X., & Shi, C. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.043 · Cited by 22
Short-term memory conjunctive binding in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cecchini, M. A., Parra, M. A., Brazzelli, M. G., Logie, R. H., & Sala, S. D. (2022) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000825 · Cited by 21
Bertaccini, R., Ellena, G., Macedo-Pascual, J., Carusi, F., Trajkovic, J., Poch, C., & Romei, V. (2022) · Vision · doi:10.3390/vision6020030 · Cited by 23
Mechanisms for individual, group-based and crowd-based attention to social information
Ristic, J., & Capozzi, F. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00118-z · Cited by 26
Lünich, M., & Keller, B. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658953 · Cited by 27
A novel computational model to probe visual search deficits during motor performance
Singh, T., Fridriksson, J., Perry, C. M., Tryon, S. C., Ross, A., Fritz, S. L., & Herter, T. M. (2016) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00561.2016 · Cited by 21
Dual Modality Code Explanations for Novices
Morrison, B. B. (2017) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/3105726.3106191 · Cited by 23
Gaze-based and attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory.
Souza, A. S., Czoschke, S., & Lange, E. B. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000771 · Cited by 21
Analysis of the Latin Square Task with linear logistic test models
Zeuch, N., Holling, H., & Kuhn, J. (2011) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.004 · Cited by 21
Visual working memory capacity is limited by two systems that change across lifespan
Ozimič, A. S., & Repovš, G. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104090 · Cited by 20
Clinical Reasoning among Registered Nurses in Emergency Medical Services: A Case Study
Andersson, U., Hagiwara, M. A., Sundström, B. W., Andersson, H., & Söderholm, H. M. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434221097788 · Cited by 20
Jurado‐Castro, J. M., Vargas-Molina, S., Gómez‐Urquiza, J. L., & Benítez‐Porres, J. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1310 · Cited by 22
Learning and retrieval processes predict fluid intelligence over and above working memory
Wang, T., Ren, X., & SCHWEIZER, K. W. (2017) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.12.005 · Cited by 20
Allen, J. V., Noser, A. E., Littlefield, A. K., Seegan, P. L., Clements, M. A., & Patton, S. R. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsx094 · Cited by 20
Security analysis and psychological study of authentication methods with PIN codes
Bultel, X., Dreier, J., Giraud, M., Izaute, M., Kheyrkhah, T., Lafourcade, P., Lakhzoum, D., Marlin, V., & Mota, L. (2018) · International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS) · doi:10.1109/rcis.2018.8406648 · Cited by 20
Cowan, N., & Rachev, N. R. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.06.001 · Cited by 21
Self-citationMonitoring vital signs with time-compressed speech.
Sanderson, P. M., Brecknell, B., Leong, S., Klüber, S., Wolf, E., Hickling, A., Tang, T.-L., Bell, E., Li, S. Y. W., & Loeb, R. G. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000217 · Cited by 20
Lee, H. J., & Cho, Y. S. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00930-8 · Cited by 20
Beege, M., Wirzberger, M., Nebel, S., Schneider, S., Schmidt, N., & Rey, G. D. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00086 · Cited by 21
Up to the magical number seven: An evolutionary perspective on the capacity of short term memory
Manoochehri, M. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06955 · Cited by 20
Cognitive Control in Schizophrenia
Barch, D. M., & Sheffield, J. M. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118920497.ch31 · Cited by 20
Dekkers, T. J., Rapport, M. D., Calub, C. A., Eckrich, S. J., & Irurita, C. (2021) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2020.1793924 · Cited by 19
van Engen, Q., Chau, G., Smith, A., Adam, K. C. S., Donoghue, T., & Voytek, B. (2026) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2340-24.2025 · Cited by 19
Influence of semantic cues on hazard-inspection performance: a case in construction safety
Liu, M., Liao, P., Wang, X., Li, S., & Rau, P. P. (2018) · International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/10803548.2018.1541648 · Cited by 19
What to expect when you are expecting earthquake early warning
Minson, S. E., Cochran, E. S., Saunders, J. K., McBride, S. K., Wu, S., Baltay, A. S., & Milner, K. R. (2022) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggac246 · Cited by 19
Wals, S. F., & Wichary, S. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2098576 · Cited by 20
Hesse, L. S., & Namburete, A. I. L. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16437-8_48 · Cited by 19
Interpretability and Explainability in Machine Learning
Tsang, W. K., & Benoit, D. F. (2022) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11593-6_5 · Cited by 19
Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., Nagy, R. P., Collie, R. J., & Bostwick, K. C. P. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102147 · Cited by 19
Visual short‐term memory‐related EEG components in a virtual reality setup
Klotzsche, F., Gaebler, M., Villringer, A., Sommer, W., Nikulin, V. V., & Ohl, S. (2023) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14378 · Cited by 19
Evans, P., & Martin, A. J. (2023) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2023.2290442 · Cited by 25
Trying Harder: How Cognitive Effort Sculpts Neural Representations during Working Memory
Master, S. L., Li, S., & Curtis, C. E. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0060-24.2024 · Cited by 21
Simmering, V. R., & Patterson, R. (2012) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.08.001 · Cited by 19
A re-examination of “bias” in human randomness perception.
Warren, P. A., Gostoli, U., Farmer, G., El‐Deredy, W., & Hahn, U. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000462 · Cited by 19
Human Voice as a Measure of Mental Load Level
Boyer, S., Paubel, P., Ruiz, R., Yagoubi, R. E., & Daurat, A. (2018) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2018_jslhr-s-18-0066 · Cited by 19
Test-retest reliability for common tasks in vision science
Clark, K., Birch-Hurst, K., Pennington, C. R., Petrie, A. C. P., Lee, J. T., & Hedge, C. (2022) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.22.8.18 · Cited by 21
Swiderski, S. M. (2011) · The Clearing House A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas · doi:10.1080/00098655.2011.590549 · Cited by 19
Peeters, M. J. (2015) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2015.06.015 · Cited by 19
Trade-off between Capacity and Precision in Visuospatial Working Memory
Roggeman, C., Klingberg, T., Feenstra, H. E. M., Compte, A., & Almeida, R. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00485 · Cited by 19
“Do we need to memorize that?” or cognitive science for chemists
Hartman, J. R., & Nelson, E. A. (2015) · Foundations of Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s10698-015-9226-z · Cited by 19
Abstraction from demonstration for efficient reinforcement learning in high-dimensional domains
Cobo, L. C., Subramanian, K., Isbell, C. L., Lanterman, A. D., & Thomaz, A. L. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2014.07.003 · Cited by 19
Doolittle, P. E., & Byrnes, M. K. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119852865.ch3 · Cited by 20
From theory to practice: a roadmap for applying dual-process theory in design cognition research
Lawrie, E., Flus, M., Olechowski, A., Hay, L., & Wodehouse, A. (2024) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2024.2336837 · Cited by 18
Alnasib, B. N. M., & Alharbi, N. S. (2024) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v14n5p501 · Cited by 18
Mennenga, S. E., Baxter, L. C., Grunfeld, I. S., Brewer, G. A., Aiken, L. S., Engler-Chiurazzi, E. B., Camp, B. W., Acosta, J. I., Braden, B. B., Schaefer, K. R., et al. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00294 · Cited by 20
Affective bias in visual working memory is associated with capacity
Xie, W., Li, H., Ying, X., Zhu, S., Fu, R., Zou, Y.-M., & Cui, Y. (2016) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1223020 · Cited by 19
Spalding, D. M., Obonsawin, M. C., Eynon, C., Glass, A., Holton, L., McGibbon, M., McMorrow, C. L., & Brown, L. A. (2020) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2020.1803217 · Cited by 18
Baker, T. B., Bolt, D. M., & Smith, S. S. (2021) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702621994551 · Cited by 19
Usability of the login authentication process: passphrases and passwords
Bhana, B., & Flowerday, S. (2021) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-07-2021-0093 · Cited by 18
The primacy of behavioral research for understanding the brainPreprint
Niv, Y. (2020) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.31234/osf.io/y8mxe · Cited by 24
Scharinger, C. (2024) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-024-01939-8 · Cited by 17
Cognitive Load Inference Using Physiological Markers in Virtual Reality
Wei, J., Siegel, E. H., Sundaramoorthy, P., Gomes, A., Zhang, S., Vankipuram, M., Smathers, K., Ghosh, S., Horii, H., Bailenson, J. N., et al. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr59515.2025.00098 · Cited by 20
Overloaded minds and machines: a cognitive load framework for human-AI symbiosis
Wang, P., Liu, H., Zou, L., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-026-11510-z · Cited by 18
Minkley, N., Kärner, T., Jojart, A., Nobbe, L., & Krell, M. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21446 · Cited by 17
Is the word-length effect linked to subvocal rehearsal?
Jacquemot, C., Emmanuel Dupoux, A., & Bachoud‐Lévi, A. (2010) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.07.007 · Cited by 17
PROSPECTS AND PITFALLS IN COMBINING EYE TRACKING DATA AND VERBAL REPORTS
Helle, L. (2017) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v5i3.254 · Cited by 17
Thomas, C., Panagiotopoulos, T., Kotipalli, P., Haynes, M., & Starner, T. E. (2018) · ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) · doi:10.1145/3267242.3267290 · Cited by 17
Managers’ cognitive capabilities and perception of market research usefulness
Tarka, P. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2018.11.005 · Cited by 17
Malmi, L., Utting, I., & Ko, A. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.022 · Cited by 18
Computing for Other Disciplines
Guzdial, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.020 · Cited by 20
Long-term memory effects on working memory updating development
Artuso, C., & Palladino, P. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217697 · Cited by 17
Tracing physics content knowledge gains using content complexity levels
Woitkowski, D. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1772520 · Cited by 17
Wutz, A., Zazio, A., & Weisz, N. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0231-20.2020 · Cited by 17
Learning by task repetition enhances object individuation and memorization in the elderly
Tagliabue, C. F., Assecondi, S., Cristoforetti, G., & Mazza, V. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75297-x · Cited by 17
Jones, K., Lennon, E., McCathie, K., Millar, A. M., Isles, C., McFadyen, A. K., & Shearer, H. (2022) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001789 · Cited by 17
Krems, J. A., & Wilkes, J. (2018) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.09.004 · Cited by 17
The Sources of Dual-task Costs in Multisensory Working Memory Tasks
Katus, T., & Martin Eimer, A. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01348 · Cited by 16
The societal responses to COVID-19: Evidence from the G7 countries
de Miranda, K. L., & Snower, D. J. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2117155119 · Cited by 16
How Do Subway Signs Affect Pedestrians’ Wayfinding Behavior through Visual Short-Term Memory?
Li, H., Xu, J., Zhang, X., & Ma, F. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13126866 · Cited by 17
The puzzle of experience vs. memory: Peak-end theory and strategic gamification design in M-commerce
Li, M., Jiang, Z. J., & Ma, G. (2022) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103749 · Cited by 17
Vossen, A. Y., Ross, V., Jongen, E. M. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Smulders, F. T. Y. (2015) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12572 · Cited by 16
Retention-error patterns in complex alphanumeric serial-recall tasks
Mathy, F., & Varré, J. (2013) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.769607 · Cited by 16
Remembering the dynamic changes in pain intensity and unpleasantness: A psychophysical study
Khoshnejad, M., Fortin, M., Rohani, F., Duncan, G. H., & Rainville, P. (2013) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.015 · Cited by 16
Szczygiel, D. D., & Maruszewski, T. (2015) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1515/ppb-2015-0041 · Cited by 16
Jacek Gwizdka, A. (2017) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3020165.3022148 · Cited by 16
Learning Outside the Classroom
Begel, A., & Ko, A. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.027 · Cited by 18
Lucas, I., Urieta, P., Balada, F., Blanco, E., & Aluja, A. (2020) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112722 · Cited by 16
What Can Neural Activity Tell Us About Cognitive Resources in Aging?
Tagliabue, C. F., & Mazza, V. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753423 · Cited by 16
Capacity limitations in template-guided multiple color search
Kerzel, D., & Grubert, A. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02040-6 · Cited by 16
Jaswal, S., & Logie, R. H. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.712540 · Cited by 16
The cost of parallel consolidation into visual working memory
Rideaux, R., & Edwards, M. (2016) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/16.6.1 · Cited by 16
Huang, G., & Quinn, A. J. (2017) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/3059454.3059481 · Cited by 16
Semantic Zooming for Ontology Graph Visualizations
Wiens, V., Lohmann, S., & Auer, S. (2017) · International Conference on Knowledge Capture · doi:10.1145/3148011.3148015 · Cited by 16
Messer, M. H., Verhagen, J., Boom, J., Mayo, A. Y., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.001 · Cited by 16
Visentin, C., & Prodi, N. (2018) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2018_jslhr-h-17-0418 · Cited by 16
Excluding and Including: News Tailoring Strategies in an Era of News Overload
Lor, Z., Oh, H. J., & Choi, J. (2022) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2048187 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowan, Nelson
- ORCID
- Cowan, Nelson
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2864034
- OpenAlex
- W2134598164
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f52d0f7bdb639a9ea900f7d1fecb39468358b00
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021338)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, storage capacity, short-term memory, individual differences, memory span
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
