The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Magical Mystery Four: How Is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?
Open accessAbstract
Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed. The ability to repeat information depends on task demands but can be distinguished from a more constant, underlying mechanism: a central memory store limited to 3 to 5 meaningful items for young adults. I discuss why this central limit is important, how it can be observed, how it differs among individuals, and why it may exist.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cowan argues that working memory has a central storage limit of about 3–5 meaningful items or chunks in young adults, observable when rehearsal, grouping, and sensory memory are controlled. The limit predicts thought and individual differences, but its underlying reasons remain unresolved.
Key findings
- A central working memory store is limited to about 3–5 chunks in young adults; in running span, only the last 3–5 digits can be recalled, and with rehearsal prevented individuals remembered only about 3 units whether items were singletons or learned pairs.
- In a dual-modality array task, people remembered about 4 squares when attending only to squares; when attending to both squares and spoken digits, they remembered fewer squares but about 4 items in all, but only when a mask wiped out sensory memory.
- Age differences appeared in storage: 7-year-olds stored about 1.5 items versus about 3.0 for older children or adults; the attention advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults when the total field was small (4 items).
- Proposed explanations split into capacity limits as weaknesses (neural timing, interference, or neuron limits) versus strengths (efficient search, chunking, and learning imperfect rules).
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis of prior behavioral studies; no new primary experiment is reported.
- Describes tasks including running span, brief simultaneous spatial arrays, unattended auditory input, articulatory suppression, paired-word chunk learning, and visual/auditory dual arrays with masks and attention conditions.
- Capacity was estimated using a hit/false-alarm formula (Cowan, 2001), with comparisons across age, attention, modality, and chunk type.
Limitations
- Stated: the reasons for the central 3–5 chunk limit remain unclear; the hypotheses are not necessarily incompatible; and precise predictions cannot yet be made for every possible task.
- Stated: some key cited results were in press at the time (e.g., Chen & Cowan; Cowan et al.), limiting available detail.
- Evident: as a review, the conclusions depend on selected prior studies and task-specific controls, with no formal meta-analysis or new data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
25 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 3 Own result
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan et al., in press
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when verbal rehearsal was prevented by having the participant repeat the word “the” throughout the trial, individuals remembered only about 3 units, no matter whether those were singletons or learned pairs.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen and Cowan (in press)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young adults can recall 3 to 5 chunks from a presented list no matter whether these are learned pairs or singletons.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this advantage for the attended shape was just as large in 7-year-olds as in adults, provided that the total number of items in the field was small (4).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundary conditions are also of practical use to predict performance when the material is too brief, long, or complex to allow processing strategies such as rehearsal or grouping.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This value was lower for 7-year-olds (~1.5) than for older children or adults (~3.0), indicating that the age groups differed in storage.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This fixed capacity limit was obtained, though, only if the items to be recalled were followed by a jumble of meaningless, mixed visual and acoustic stimuli (a mask) so that sensory memory would be wiped out and the measure of working memory would be limited to central memory.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tests of working memory demonstrate practical limits that vary, depending on whether the test circumstances allow processes such as grouping or rehearsal, focusing of attention on just the material relevant to the task, and the use of modality- or material-specific stores to supplement a central store.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies indicate that working memory capacity varies among people, predicts individual differences in intellectual ability, and changes across the life span (Cowan, 2005).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Working memory is used in mental tasks, such as language comprehension (for example, retaining ideas from early in a sentence to be combined with ideas later on), problem solving (in arithmetic, carrying a digit from the ones to the tens column while remembering the numbers), and planning (determining the best order in which to visit the bank, library, and grocery).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was also an advantage for the test of the shape to be remembered, compared to the shape to be ignored; attention helped greatly.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage-specific capacity is a more analytic concept and stays constant across a much wider variety of circumstances.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in some ways, the existing limits may be ideal, or nearly so, for humans.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are probably factors of biological economy limiting central capacity”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > CONCLUSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The reasons for the central working memory storage limit of 3–5 chunks remain unclear but Cowan (2005) reviewed a variety of hypotheses.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > WHY THE STORAGE CAPACITY LIMIT?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“if they were asked to attend to both squares and digits, they could remember fewer squares, but about 4 items in all.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saults & Cowan, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That central memory is especially important because it underlies problem-solving and abstract thought.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Other work suggests that storage and processing capacities both make important, partly separate and partly overlapping contributions to intelligence and development (Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006).”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL CAPACITY LIMITS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cowan, Fristoe, Elliott, Brunner, & Saults, 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recall limit is important because it measures what is termed working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960), the few temporarily active thoughts.”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baddeley & Hitch, 1974
- Not checked yetcites Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1960
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“He demonstrated that one can repeat back a list of no more than about seven randomly ordered, meaningful items or chunks”
§ The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller (1956)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.
“Working memory storage capacity is important because cognitive tasks can be completed only with sufficient ability to hold information as it is processed.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, the limited processing capacity of a learner's working memory (WM) is considered a bottleneck (Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956); for new, yet to be learned information, its processing capacity is limited to only 4±1 elements (Cowan 2010)”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Cowan 2010
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Self-citationPlans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Brown, R. W. (1960) · Language · doi:10.2307/411065 · Cited by 3,525
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
Baddeley, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · Cited by 2,432
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · Cited by 1,414
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04171 · Cited by 1,367
Cowan, N. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315625560 · Cited by 977
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rudin, C. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x · Cited by 10,561
Machine Learning Interpretability: A Survey on Methods and Metrics
Carvalho, D. V., Pereira, E. M., & Cardoso, J. S. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8080832 · Cited by 1,842
Meta-learning with memory-augmented neural networks
Santoro, A., Bartunov, S., Botvinick, M., Wierstra, D., & Lillicrap, T. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 1,504
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002 · Cited by 1,502
The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy
Moro, C., Štromberga, Z., Raikos, A., & Stirling, A. (2017) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1696 · Cited by 1,151
Working Memory Underpins Cognitive Development, Learning, and Education
Cowan, N. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y · Cited by 1,048
Self-citationMiller, E. K., Lundqvist, M., & Bastos, A. M. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.023 · Cited by 797
Cognition in schizophrenia: core psychological and neural mechanisms
Barch, D. M., & Ceaser, A. E. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.015 · Cited by 792
Working Memory From the Psychological and Neurosciences Perspectives: A Review
Chai, W. J., Hamid, A. I. A., & Abdullah, J. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401 · Cited by 603
Anatomical insights into the interaction of emotion and cognition in the prefrontal cortex
Ray, R. D., & Zald, D. H. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.08.005 · Cited by 446
In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect
Souza, A., & Oberauer, K. (2016) · Attention, perception & psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5 · Cited by 379
One-shot Learning with Memory-Augmented Neural NetworksPreprint
Santoro, A., Bartunov, S., Botvinick, M., Wierstra, D., & Lillicrap, T. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.06065 · Cited by 515
Collins, A. G. E., & Frank, M. J. (2012) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07980.x · Cited by 457
Memory encoding and aging: A neurocognitive perspective
Craik, F. I. M., & Rose, N. S. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.007 · Cited by 352
On the law relating processing to storage in working memory.
Barrouillet, P., Portrat, S., & Camos, V. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0022324 · Cited by 327
Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts
Bruch, E. E., & Feinberg, F. M. (2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053622 · Cited by 318
The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: attribution of mental states to other species
Urquiza-Haas, E. G., & Kotrschal, K. M. (2015) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.011 · Cited by 304
What’s magic about magic numbers? Chunking and data compression in short-term memory
Mathy, F., & Feldman, J. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.003 · Cited by 259
The cognitive challenges of effective teaching
Chew, S. L., & Cerbin, W. J. (2020) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266 · Cited by 292
Attention Restoration Theory: Exploring the Role of Soft Fascination and Mental Bandwidth
Basu, A. S., Duvall, J., & Kaplan, R. (2018) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916518774400 · Cited by 279
Turning Attention Inside Out: How Working Memory Serves Behavior
van Ede, F., & Nobre, A. C. (2022) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-021422-041757 · Cited by 259
Lyngs, U., Lukoff, K., Slovák, P., Binns, R., Slack, A., Inzlicht, M., Kleek, M. G. V., & Shadbolt, N. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300361 · Cited by 272
Cairney, P., & Kwiatkowski, R. M. (2017) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-017-0046-8 · Cited by 243
Cognitive load theory and its relationships with motivation: A self-determination theory perspective
Evans, P., Vansteenkiste, M., Parker, P., Kingsford-Smith, A., & Zhou, S. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09841-2 · Cited by 200
A Flexible Model of Working Memory
Bouchacourt, F., & Buschman, T. J. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.020 · Cited by 207
Cognitive Load Theory and Human Movement: Towards an Integrated Model of Working Memory
Sepp, S., Howard, S. J., Tindall‐Ford, S., Agostinho, S., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09461-9 · Cited by 207
Novice Programmers and Introductory Programming
Robins, A. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.013 · Cited by 191
Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x · Cited by 180
Dissociable cognitive strategies for sensorimotor learning
McDougle, S. D., & Taylor, J. A. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07941-0 · Cited by 186
Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108894333.008 · Cited by 203
Gürsoy, D. (2018) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.003 · Cited by 181
The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length.
Kenett, Y. N., Levi, E., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000391 · Cited by 165
Short-term memory based on activated long-term memory: A review in response to Norris (2017).
Cowan, N. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000199 · Cited by 159
Self-citationThe development of visual working memory capacity during early childhood
Simmering, V. R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.007 · Cited by 146
Neural mechanisms of attending to items in working memory
Manohar, S., Zokaei, N., Fallon, S. J., Vogels, T. P., & Husain, M. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.017 · Cited by 156
Asgari, E., Kaur, J., Nuredini, G., Balloch, J., Taylor, A. M., Sebire, N., Robinson, R., Peters, C., Sridharan, S., & Pimenta, D. (2024) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/55499 · Cited by 142
Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Sanchez-Stockhammer, C., & Schneider, S. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09738-0 · Cited by 139
Cunningham, C. A., & Egeth, H. E. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615626564 · Cited by 139
Why Forget? On the Adaptive Value of Memory Loss
Nørby, S. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615596787 · Cited by 156
Sortwell, A., Trimble, K., Ferraz, R. M. P., Geelan, D., Hine, G., Ramírez‐Campillo, R., Carter-Thuillier, B. I., Gkintoni, E., & Xuan, Q. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16177826 · Cited by 160
Characterizing cognitive aging in humans with links to animal models
Alexander, G. E., Ryan, L., Bowers, D., Foster, T. C., Bizon, J. L., Geldmacher, D., & Glisky, E. L. (2012) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2012.00021 · Cited by 144
The synergy of embodied cognition and cognitive load theory for optimized learning
Zou, L., Zhang, Z., Mavilidi, M., Chen, Y., Herold, F., Ouwehand, K., & Paas, F. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02152-2 · Cited by 131
Working memory in older adults declines with age, but is modulated by sex and education
Pliatsikas, C., Veríssimo, J., Babcock, L., Pullman, M. Y., Glei, D. A., Weinstein, M., Goldman, N., & Ullman, M. T. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021818791994 · Cited by 143
The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research
Fincher, S., Robins, A. V., Margulieux, L. E., Morrison, B. B., Shephard, K., Loui, M., Borrego, M., Lancaster, T., Falkner, K., Sheard, J., et al. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555 · Cited by 141
Working memory impairment as an endophenotypic marker of a schizophrenia diathesis
Park, S., & Gooding, D. C. (2014) · Schizophrenia Research Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.scog.2014.09.005 · Cited by 135
Unloading and reloading working memory: Attending to one item frees capacity.
Souza, A. S., Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0036331 · Cited by 117
Distribution of cognitive load in Web search
Jacek Gwizdka, A. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21385 · Cited by 130
The primacy of behavioral research for understanding the brain.
Niv, Y. (2021) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/bne0000471 · Cited by 124
Educating the Developing Mind: Towards an Overarching Paradigm
Δημητρίου, Α., Spanoudis, G. C., & Mouyi, A. (2011) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9178-3 · Cited by 129
Collins, A. G. E., Albrecht, M. A., Waltz, J. A., Gold, J. M., & Frank, M. J. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.017 · Cited by 111
Synaptic Correlates of Working Memory Capacity
Mi, Y., Katkov, M., & Tsodyks, M. V. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.004 · Cited by 116
Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning
Hu, F., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.002 · Cited by 112
Extracting multistage screening rules from online dating activity data
Bruch, E. E., Feinberg, F. M., & Lee, K. Y. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1522494113 · Cited by 105
Devos, H., Gustafson, K. M., Ahmadnezhad, P., Liao, K., Mahnken, J. D., Brooks, W. M., & Burns, J. M. (2020) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci10120994 · Cited by 115
Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, C. M. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119636113.ch5 · Cited by 112
The neuroscience of active learning and direct instruction
Dubinsky, J. M., & Hamid, A. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105737 · Cited by 121
Trends in Language Acquisition Research
Abbot‐Smith, K. (2013) · Trends in language acquisition research · doi:10.1075/tilar · Cited by 98
The Tortoise and the Hare: Interactions between Reinforcement Learning and Working Memory
Collins, A. G. E. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01238 · Cited by 97
Darcy, I., Park, H., & Yang, C.-L. M. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.005 · Cited by 96
Improved matrix reasoning is limited to training on tasks with a visuospatial component
Stephenson, C. L., & Halpern, D. F. (2013) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.05.006 · Cited by 95
Children with low working memory and children with ADHD: same or different?
Holmes, J., Hilton, K. A., Place, M., Alloway, T. P., Elliott, J. G., & Gathercole, S. E. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00976 · Cited by 94
Working Memory Capacity as a Dynamic Process
Simmering, V. R., & Perone, S. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00567 · Cited by 93
Bawa, P. (2019) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239518804173 · Cited by 92
Antecedents and outcomes of consumers’ confusion in the online tourism domain
Lu, A. C. C., Gürsoy, D., & Lu, C. Y. R. (2016) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2015.11.020 · Cited by 92
Introducing Language and Cognition
Smith, M. S. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316591505 · Cited by 91
Kim, Y., Park, H., Kim, H., Kim, J., & Seo, K. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103093 · Cited by 101
Human factors in anaesthesia: a narrative review
Kelly, F. E., Frerk, C., Bailey, C. R., Cook, T. M., Ferguson, K., Flin, R. H., Fong, K. J., Groom, P., John, C., Lang, A. R., et al. (2023) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.15920 · Cited by 92
Effects of group experience and information distribution on collaborative learning
Jimmy Zambrano, R., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-019-09495-0 · Cited by 87
Improving working memory efficiency by reframing metacognitive interpretation of task difficulty.
Autin, F., & Croizet, J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0027478 · Cited by 102
Working memory predicts children’s analogical reasoning
Simms, N. K., Frausel, R. R., & Richland, L. E. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.005 · Cited by 95
Is bilingualism associated with better working memory capacity? A meta-analysis
Monnier, C., Boiché, J., Armandon, P., Baudoin, S., & Bellocchi, S. (2021) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2021.1908220 · Cited by 92
Zumbrunn, S. K., Broda, M., Varier, D., & Conklin, S. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12315 · Cited by 95
Visual working memory and action: Functional links and bi-directional influences
van Ede, F. (2020) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2020.1759744 · Cited by 90
A theory of memory for binary sequences: Evidence for a mental compression algorithm in humans
Planton, S., van Kerkoerle, T., Abbih, L., Maheu, M., Meyniel, F., Sigman, M., Wang, L., Figueira, S. D., Romano, S., & Dehaene, S. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008598 · Cited by 94
Familiarity increases the number of remembered Pokémon in visual short-term memory
Xie, W., & Zhang, W. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0679-7 · Cited by 83
Encoding Deficits Impede Word Learning and Memory in Adults With Developmental Language Disorders
McGregor, K. K., Gordon, K. R., Eden, N. M., Arbisi-Kelm, T., & Oleson, J. (2017) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-l-17-0031 · Cited by 91
Sequence learning is driven by improvements in motor planning
Ariani, G., & Diedrichsen, J. (2019) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00041.2019 · Cited by 82
Choice Set Formation in Residential Mobility and Its Implications for Segregation Dynamics
Bruch, E. E., & Swait́, J. (2019) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-019-00810-5 · Cited by 87
Divergent thinking and the core executive functions: a state-of-the-art review
Palmiero, M., Fusi, G., Crepaldi, M., Borsa, V. M., & Rusconi, M. L. (2022) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-022-01091-4 · Cited by 90
Joint attention enhances visual working memory.
Gregory, S. E. A., & Jackson, M. C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000294 · Cited by 80
Curzon, P., Bell, T., Waite, J., & Dorling, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.018 · Cited by 85
Modeling Working Memory in a Spiking Neuron Network Accompanied by Astrocytes
Gordleeva, S., Tsybina, Y., Krivonosov, M., Ivanchenko, M., Zaikin, A. A., Kazantsev, V., & Gorban, A. N. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2021.631485 · Cited by 83
Neuromorphic learning, working memory, and metaplasticity in nanowire networks
Loeffler, A., Álvarez, A. D., Zhu, R., Ganesh, N., Shine, J. M., Nakayama, T., & Kuncic, Z. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg3289 · Cited by 81
Working Memory Capacity as a Predictor of Cognitive Training Efficacy in the Elderly Population
Matysiak, O., Kroemeke, A., & Brzezicka, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00126 · Cited by 85
Learning in double time: The effect of lecture video speed on immediate and delayed comprehension
Murphy, D. H., Hoover, K. M., Agadzhanyan, K., Kuehn, J. C., & Castel, A. D. (2021) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3899 · Cited by 85
CNTRICS Imaging Biomarkers Selection: Working Memory
Barch, D. M., Moore, H. M., Nee, D. E., Manoach, D. S., & Luck, S. J. (2011) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbr160 · Cited by 76
Pornographic Picture Processing Interferes with Working Memory Performance
Laier, C., Schulte, F. P., & Brand, M. (2012) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.716873 · Cited by 80
Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions
Buszard, T., Farrow, D., Verswijveren, S. J. J. M., Reid, M. M., Williams, J., Polman, R. C. J., Ling, F. C. M., & Masters, R. S. W. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01350 · Cited by 74
Selective attention, filtering, and the development of working memory
Plebanek, D. J., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2018) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12727 · Cited by 73
Serrano, C. I., & Karahanna, E. (2016) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2016/40.3.04 · Cited by 72
Oscillatory EEG dynamics underlying automatic chunking during sentence processing
Bonhage, C., Meyer, L., Gruber, T., Friederici, A. D., & Mueller, J. L. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.018 · Cited by 72
How Humans Solve Complex Problems: The Case of the Knapsack Problem
Murawski, C., & Bossaerts, P. L. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34851 · Cited by 70
Medical artificial intelligence for clinicians: the lost cognitive perspective
Tikhomirov, L., Semmler, C., McCradden, M. D., Searston, R. A., Ghassemi, M., & Oakden‐Rayner, L. (2024) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(24)00095-5 · Cited by 69
Working memory and developmental language impairments
Henry, L. A., & Botting, N. (2016) · Child Language Teaching and Therapy · doi:10.1177/0265659016655378 · Cited by 84
Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000245 · Cited by 70
Slonimska, A., Özyürek, A., & Capirci, O. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104246 · Cited by 67
Integrating Motivation and Instruction: Towards a Unified Approach in Educational Psychology
Martin, A. J. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09774-w · Cited by 75
Programming Paradigms and Beyond
Krishnamurthi, S., & Fisler, K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.014 · Cited by 69
No accounting for taste? Idiographic models of aesthetic judgment in music.
Juslin, P. N., Sakka, L. S., Barradas, G. T., & Liljeström, S. (2016) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/aca0000034 · Cited by 65
The role of numerical competence in a specialized predatory strategy of an araneophagic spider
Nelson, X. J., & Jackson, R. R. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0498-6 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowan, Nelson
- ORCID
- Cowan, Nelson
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2864034
- OpenAlex
- W2134598164
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f52d0f7bdb639a9ea900f7d1fecb39468358b00
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021338)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory, storage capacity, short-term memory, individual differences, memory span
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
