Cited by 181Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeural dynamics and brain function

Unconscious High-Level Information Processing: Implication for Neurobiological Theories of Consciousness

van Gaal, Simon, Lamme, Victor A. F.·2012·The Neuroscientist

Abstract

Theories about the neural correlates and functional relevance of consciousness have traditionally assigned a crucial role to the prefrontal cortex in generating consciousness as well as in orchestrating high-level conscious control over behavior. However, recent neuroscientific findings show that prefrontal cortex can be activated unconsciously. The depth, direction, and scope of these activations depend on several top-down factors such as the task being probed (task-set, strategy) and on (temporal/spatial) attention. Regardless, such activations-when mediated by feedforward activation only-do not lead to a conscious sensation. Although unconscious, these prefrontal activations are functional, in the sense that they are associated with behavioral effects of cognitive control, such as response inhibition, task switching, conflict monitoring, and error detection. These findings challenge the pivotal role of the prefrontal cortex in consciousness. Instead, it appears that specific brain areas (or cognitive modules) may support specific cognitive functions but that consciousness is independent of this. Conscious sensations arise only when the brain areas involved engage in recurrent interactions enabling the long-lasting exchange of information between brain regions. Moreover, recent evidence suggests that also the state of consciousness, for example, in vegetative state patients or during sleep and anesthesia, is closely related to the scope and extent of residual recurrent inte…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073858411404079

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One of the main debates in the literature is regarding the existence, extent, and scope of unconscious processing.

    “One of the main debates in the literature is regarding the existence, extent, and scope of unconscious processing (Dehaene and Naccache 2001; Kunde et al. 2012; van Gaal and Lamme 2012; Hassin 2013; Newell and Shanks 2014; Meyen et al. 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Gaal, S., & Lamme, V. A. F.
Affiliations
  • Cognitive Neuroscience Group, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
The Neuroscientist
Published
2011-05-31
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
287-301
ISSN
  • 1073-8584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4098
OpenAlex
W2125978348
Cited by
181
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Neuroscientist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
consciousness, neural correlates of consciousness, cognitive control, top-down attention, response inhibition, task switching, conflict monitoring, error detection, vegetative state, sleep, anesthesia, states of consciousness
MeSH terms
Cognition, Consciousness, Humans, Models, Neurological, Unconscious, Psychology, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review