Cited by 101Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsPolitical Theory and Democracy

Affective Polarisation in Times of Political Instability and Conflict. Spain from a Comparative Perspective

Open access
Torcal, Mariano, Comellas, Josep M.·2022·South European Society and Politics

Abstract

This is an introductory article for a special issue on affective polarisation in Spain. After discussing the concept and its operationalisation in multi-party settings, we offer data on affective polarisation in Spain and Southern Europe from a comparative perspective using the Comparative National Election Project (CNEP) and Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES). In the second part, we pay special attention to the Spanish case, analysing different dimensions of affective polarisation and its evolution overtime, by taking advantage of an extensive number of indicators from the E-DEM panel survey. Finally, we describe its relationship with ideological polarisation and analyse its possible multidimensional nature. We conclude by introducing the rest of contributions of this special issue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13608746.2022.2044236

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Alvarez, M. R. & Nagler, J. (2004) 'Party system compactness: measurement and consequences', Political Analysis, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 46-62.
  2. Bankert, A., Huddy, L. & Rosema, M. (2017) 'Measuring partisanship as a social identity in multi-party systems', Political Behavior, vol. 39, pp. 103-132.
  3. Bartolini, S. & Mair, P. (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885-1985, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  4. Bischof, D. & Wagner, M. (2019) 'Do voters polarize when radical parties enter parliament?', American Journal of Political Science, vol. 63, pp. 888-904.
  5. Bougher, L. D. (2017) 'The correlates of discord: identity, issue alignment, and political hostility in polarized America', Political Behavior, vol. 39, pp. 731-762.
  6. Criado, H., Herreros, F., Miller, L. & Ubeda, P. (2015) 'Ethnicity and trust: a multifactorial experiment', Political Studies, vol. 63, no. S1, pp. 131-152.
  7. Criado, H., Herreros, F., Miller, L. & Ubeda, P. (2018) 'The unintended consequences of political mobilization on trust: the case of the secessionist process in Catalonia', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 231-253.
  8. Curini, L. & Hino, A. (2012) 'Missing links in party-system polarization: how institutions and voters matter', The Journal of Politics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 460-473.
  9. Druckman, J. N. & Levendusky, M. S. (2019) 'What do we measure when we measure affective polarization?', Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 114-122.
  10. Ezrow, L. (2007) 'The variance matters: how party systems represent the preferences of voters', Journal of Politics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 182-192.
  11. Franklin, M. N., Mackie, T. T. & Valen, H. (1992) Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  12. Garmendia Madariaga, A. & Riera, P. (2022) 'Territorial polarisation after radical parties' break- through in Spain', South European Society and Politics, vol. 27, no.
  13. Harteveld, E. (2021a) 'Fragmented foes: affective polarization in the multiparty context of the Netherlands', Electoral Studies, vol. 71, pp. 102332.
  14. Hazan, R. Y. (1995) 'Center parties and systemic polarization: an exploration of recent trends in Western Europe', Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 421-445.
  15. Hernández, E., Anduiza, E. & Rico, G. (2021) 'Affective polarization and the salience of elections', Electoral Studies, vol. 69, pp. article 102203.
  16. Hetherington, M. J. (2009) 'Putting polarization in perspective', British Journal of Political Science, vol. 39, pp. 413-448
  17. Hetherington, M. J., Long, M. T. & Rudolph, T. J. (2016) 'Revisiting the myth: new evidence of a polarized electorate', Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 80, no. S1, pp. 321-350.
  18. Hobolt, S. B., Leeper, T. J. & Tilley, J. (2020) 'Divided by the vote: affective polarization in the wake of the Brexit referendum', British Journal of Political Science. online.
  19. Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2018) 'Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage', Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 109-135.
  20. Huddy, L. (2001) 'From social to political identity: a critical examination of social identity theory', Political Psychology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 127-156.
  21. Huddy, L., Bankert, A. & Davies, C. (2018) 'Expressive versus instrumental partisanship in multiparty European systems', Advances in Political Psychology, vol. 39, no. S1, pp. 173-199.
  22. Huddy, L., Mason, L. & Aarøe, L. (2015) 'Expressive partisanship: campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity', American Political Science Review, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 1-17.
  23. Kingzette, J. (2021) 'Who do you loathe? Feelings towards politicians vs. ordinary people in the opposing party', Journal of Experimental Political Science, vol. 8, pp. 75-84.
  24. Kitschelt, H. & Rehm, P. (2015) 'Party alignments: change and continuity', in The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, eds P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt & H. Kriesi, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 179-201.
  25. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S. & Wüest, B. (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  26. Lipset, S. M. & Rokkan, S. (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments, Free Press, New York.
  27. Lorenzo-Rodríguez, J. & Torcal, M. (2022) 'Twitter and affective polarisation: following political leaders in Spain', South European Society and Politics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 147-173.
  28. Lupu, N. (2015) 'Party polarization and mass partisanship: a comparative perspective', Political Behavior, vol. 37, pp. 331-356.
  29. MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L. & Marcus, G. E. (2010) 'Civic engagements: resolute partisan- ship or reflective deliberation', American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 440-458.
  30. Mason, L. (2018b) 'Ideologues without issues: the polarizing consequences of ideological identities', Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 82, no. S1, pp. 866-887.
  31. McCarty, N., Poole, K. T. & Rosenthal, H. (2006) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  32. McCoy, J. (2019) '"Pernicious polarizations" threat to democracy: lessons for the U.S. from abroad', APSA Newsletter Comparative Politics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 22-29.
  33. McCoy, J., Rahman, T. & Somer, M. (2018) 'Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities', American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 16-42.
  34. McCoy, J. & Somer, M. (2019) 'Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: comparative evidence and possible remedies', The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 234-l271.
  35. Miller, L. (2020) 'Polarización en España: más divididos por ideología e identidad que por políticas públicas', EsadeEcPol Insight, vol. 18, pp. 1-14.
  36. Orriols, L. & León, S. (2020) 'Looking for affective polarisation in Spain: PSOE and Podemos from conflict to coalition', South European Society and Politics, vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 351-379.
  37. Padró-Solanet, A. & Balcells, J. (2022) 'Media diet and polarisation: evidence from Spain', South European Society and Politics, vol. 27, no.
  38. Pallarés, F. & Keating, M. (2003) 'Multi-level electoral competition: regional elections and party systems in Spain', European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 239-255.
  39. Reiljan, A., Garzia, D., da Silva, F. F. & Trechsel, A. H. (2021) 'Patterns of affective polarization in the democratic world: comparing the polarized feelings towards parties and leaders', paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Online conference, 17-28 May.
  40. Rodon, T. (2022) 'Affective and territorial polarisation: the impact on vote choice in Spain', South European Society and Politics, vol. 27, no.
  41. Rodríguez, I., Santamaría, D. & Miller, L. (2022) 'Competition and partisan affective polarisation in Spain', South European Society and Politics, vol. 27, no.
  42. Rudolph, T. J. & Hetherington, M. J. (2021) 'Affective polarization in political and nonpolitical settings', International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 591-606.
  43. Serani, D. (2022) 'In-party like, out-party dislike and propensity to vote in Spain', South European Society and Politics, vol. 27, no.
  44. Sides, J., Tesler, M. & Vavreck, L. (2018) Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and Battle for the Meaning of America, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  45. Somer, M. (2019) 'Turkey: the slippery slope from reformist to revolutionary polarization and democratic breakdown', The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 42-61.
  46. Somer, M. & McCoy, J. (2018a) 'Transformations through polarizations and global threats to democracy', The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 8-22.
  47. Somer, M. & McCoy, J. (2018b) 'Déjà vu? Polarization and endangered democracies in the 21st century', American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 3-15.
  48. Suhay, E., Bello-Pardo, E. & Maurer, B. (2018) 'The polarizing effects of online partisan criticism: evidence from two experiments', The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 95-115.
  49. Svolik, M. W. (2019) 'Polarization versus democracy', Journal of Democracy, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 20-32.
  50. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979) 'An integrative theory of intergroup conflict', in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds W. G. Austin & S. Worchel, Brooks/Cole, Monterrey, pp. 33-47.
  51. Thomassen, J. & Rosema, M. (2009) 'Party identification revisited', in Political Parties and Partisanship: Social Identity and Individual Attitudes, eds J. Bartle & P. Bellucci, Routledge/ ECPR Studies in European Political Science (No. 57), Oxford, pp. 42-59.
  52. Torcal, M. & Carty, E. (2022) 'Partisan sentiments and political trust: a longitudinal study of Spain', South European Society and Politics, vol. 27, no.
  53. Torcal, M., Santana, A., Carty, E. & Comellas, J. M. (2020) 'Political and affective polarisation in a democracy in crisis: the E-DEM panel survey dataset (Spain, 2018-2019)', Data in Brief, vol. 32, pp. 106059.
  54. Ward, D. G. & Tavits, M. (2019) 'How partisan affect shapes citizens' perception of the political world', Electoral Studies, vol. 60, pp. article 102045.
  55. Webster, S. W. & Abramowitz, A. I. (2017) 'The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the U.S. electorate', American Politics Research, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 621-647.
  56. Westwood, S. J., Iyengar, S., Walgrave, S., Leonisio, R., Miller, L. & Strijbis, O. (2018) 'The tie that divides: cross-national evidences of the primacy of partyism', European Journal of Political Research, vol. 57, pp. 333-354.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Torcal, M., & Comellas, J. M.
Affiliations
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Corresponding author
Torcal, Mariano
Venue
South European Society and Politics
Published
2022-01-02
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 1360-8746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9612
OpenAlex
W4223554657
Cited by
101
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 8
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • South European Society & Politics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (2019)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (2019)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
affective polarization, political instability, political conflict, multiparty system, ideological polarization, Spanish politics, Southern Europe, comparative politics, Comparative Study of Electoral Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review