Cited by 46Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neuropsychological Functioning in Adults With ADHD and Adults With Other Psychiatric Disorders: The Issue of Specificity

Holst, Ylva, Thorell, Lisa B.·2017·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate how well neuropsychological measures can discriminate between adults with ADHD and those with other psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Adults with ADHD and a clinical control group ( n = 110) were included. Neuropsychological functioning was investigated using measures of inhibition, working memory, set shifting, planning, fluency, reaction-time variability, and delay aversion. RESULTS: Adults with ADHD performed more poorly compared with clinical controls with regard to all constructs. The effects of verbal memory, inhibition, set shifting, fluency, and delay aversion remained significant when controlling for IQ. However, when controlling for basic cognitive functions, only the effects of inhibition, fluency, and delay aversion were significant. Sensitivity ranged between 64% and 75%, and specificity between 66% and 81%. CONCLUSION: Neuropsychological tests have a relatively poor ability to discriminate between adults with ADHD and clinical controls, but they may be used to identify individuals at particularly high risk for poor daily functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054713506264

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holst, Y., & Thorell, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Thorell, Lisa B.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
137-148
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2075204066
Cited by
46
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
adult ADHD, neuropsychological performance, mental illness, differential diagnosis, inhibition, working memory, set-shifting, planning, verbal fluency, reaction time variability, delay aversion, sensitivity and specificity, daily functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Case-Control Studies, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review