Cited by 27Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The Etiological Structure of Cognitive-Neurophysiological Impairments in ADHD in Adolescence and Young Adulthood

Open access
Michelini, Giorgia, Cheung, Celeste H. M., Kitsune, Viryanaga, Brandeis, Daniel, Banaschewski, Tobias, McLoughlin, Gráinne, Asherson, Philip, Rijsdijk, Frühling +1 more·2021·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies in children with ADHD identified two partially separable familial factors underlying cognitive dysfunction, but evidence in adolescents and adults is lacking. Here, we investigate the etiological structure of cognitive-neurophysiological impairments in ADHD in adolescents and young adults. Method: Factor analyses and multivariate familial models were run in 356 participants from ADHD and control sibling pairs aged 11 to 27 years on data on IQ, digit span forward (DSF) and backward (DSB), and cognitive-performance and event-related potential (ERP) measures from three cognitive tasks. Results: Three familial factors (cF 1-3 ), showing substantial familial overlap with ADHD, captured the familial covariation of ADHD with nine cognitive-ERP measures. cF 1 loaded on IQ, mean reaction time (MRT), and reaction-time variability (RTV); cF 2 on DSF and DSB; and cF 3 on number of errors and ERPs of inhibition and error processing. Conclusion: These results identify three partially separable etiological pathways leading to cognitive-neurophysiological impairments in adolescent and adult ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054718771191

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given the complexity and heterogeneity of neurodevelopmental disorders in terms of pathophysiology, it is highly unlikely that biomarker applications based on a single parameter will be meaningful in clinical practice.

    “Arguably, given the complexity and heterogeneity of neurodevelopmental disorders in terms of pathophysiology, it is highly unlikely that biomarker applications based on a single parameter will be meaningful in clinical practice 44-47 .”

    From Candidate diagnostic biomarkers for neurodevelopmental disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Discussion (page not provided) describes multiple, partially distinct pathways underlying cognitive and brain-function impairments in adolescents and young adults with ADHD. It does not assess whether single-parameter biomarkers would be meaningful in clinical practice, and its findings about ADHD do not establish that conclusion for neurodevelopmental disorders generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barkley RA Murphy K Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook G. Press 3rd ed. New York, NY Guildford Press 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michelini, G., Cheung, C. H. M., Kitsune, V., Brandeis, D., Banaschewski, T., McLoughlin, G., Asherson, P., Rijsdijk, F., & Kuntsi, J.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Kuntsi, Jonna
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2018-05-03
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
91-104
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2781758502
Cited by
27
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Sage Journals Data (cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (G0300189, G9817803)
  • National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062873)
  • Action Medical Research and the Peter Sowerby Charitable Foundation (GN1777)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adolescents, young adults, cognitive impairment, event-related potentials, family factors, heritability, digit span, reaction time variability, inhibition, error processing, IQ, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Reaction Time, Young Adult, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review