Cited by 373Genetic Associations and EpidemiologySchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Research Topics

Endophenotype: a conceptual analysis

Open access
Kendler, K S, Neale, M C·2010·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

This paper provides a conceptual analysis of the endophenotype (EP) construct that is having an increasing role in genetic strategies for unraveling the etiology of psychiatric disorders (PDs). We make six major points illustrated through the method of path analysis. First, it is important to distinguish between mediational and liability-index (or 'risk indicator') models for EP, as only the former requires genetic risk for PD to pass through EP. Second, the relative reliability of EP and PD can have a critical role in the interpretation of results. Ignoring them can lead to substantial errors of inference. Third, we need to consider bidirectional relationships between an EP and a PD, and the possibility that genetic effects on PD are only partially mediated by EP. Fourth, EP models typically assume that all genetic effects that have an impact on EP also alter risk for PD. However, among the genetic influences on EP and PD, it is also plausible that some will influence only EP, some only PD and some both. Fifth, we should also consider models incorporating multiple EPs and PDs, which can be well captured by multivariate genetic methods. Sixth, EPs may also reflect the impact of the environment on risk for PDs. The EP concept has important potential lessons for etiological research in PDs that can be optimized by considering it as a special case of a broader set of multivariate genetic models, which can be fitted using currently available methodology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mp.2010.8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Threshold-dependent models postulate that disease is more likely in individuals with extreme values of underlying endophenotypes.

    “Threshold-dependent models77 postulate that disease is more likely to arise in individuals who have extreme values of underlying endophenotypes78,79.”

    From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [79]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Neale MC Kendler KS Models of comorbidity for multifactorial disorders Am J Hum Genet 1995 57 935 953 7573055 PMC1801512

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendler, K. S., & Neale, M. C.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Kendler, K S
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2010-02-09
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
789-797
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W2079474105
Cited by
373
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 34
FWCI
19.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA-011408, R37AA011408, R01AA011408)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-068643, R01MH068643)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA011287, DA011287, DA-18673, R01DA018673, R37DA018673)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
endophenotypes, mental illness, genetic etiology, mediation model, genetic risk, reliability statistics, bidirectional relationship, environmental influences, path analysis
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Models, Molecular, Reproducibility of Results, Endophenotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review