CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 514Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 181 of the 184 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Investment and Personality: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship of Personality Traits to Investment in Work, Family, Religion, and Volunteerism

Lodi-Smith, Jennifer, Roberts, Brent W.·2007·Personality and Social Psychology Review
DOI 10.1177/1088868306294590
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Investing in normative, age-graded social roles has broad implications for both the individual and society. The current meta-analysis examines the way in which personality traits relate to four such investments -- work, family, religion, and volunteerism. The present study uses meta-analytic techniques (K = 94) to identify the cross-sectional patterns of relationships between social investment in these four roles and the personality trait domains of agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability. Results show that the extent of investment in social roles across these domains is positively related to agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and low psychoticism. These findings are more robust when individuals are psychologically committed to rather than simply demographically associated with the investment role.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868306294590

Cites

181 of 181 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1545 · DOI
  2. Anhalt, R. L. (1995). Exploring the relationship between personality characteristics and effective teamwork behaviors . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  3. Brandon, J. B. (2002). The development of women along the managerial track: The influence of conscientiousness and the work context . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
  4. Buettner, D., 2005, National Geographic, 208, 1
  5. Fausz, A. T. (1994). Factors related to supervisory ratings of employees’ customer service orientation . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
  6. Foust, M. S. (2001). An investigation of the antecedents of lateness behavior: The effects of attitudes, individual differences, and context . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Akron, OH.
  7. Francis, L. J., 1995, Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 14, 250
  8. Grojean, M. W. (2002). Characteristic adaptation as a mediator between personality and contextual performance: A partial test of the McCrae and Costa (1996) model . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.176 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.544 · DOI
  11. Hirschfeld, R. R. (1996). Evidence for the discriminant validity of conscientiousness and work orientation as principal components of global trait work motivation . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University, Alabama.
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.27 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/0012-1649.31.1.86 · DOI
  14. Mehl, M. R., 2004, [Manifestations of personality in students’ natural conversations]
  15. Newson, D. R. (2002). Organizational cynicism: The impact on citizenship behavior and organizational change . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa.
  16. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1190 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1037/0021-843X.106.1.52 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/0893-3200.16.2.172 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1288 · DOI
  20. Stryker, S., Journal of Personality
  21. 10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.239 · DOI
  22. Verma, O. P., 1985, Perspectives in Psychological Research, 8, 25

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 514

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
ORCID
Roberts, Brent W.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2007-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
68-86
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
DOI
10.1177/1088868306294590
OpenAlex
W2155327326
Cited by
513
References
184
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG21178, R01AG021178)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
social investment, personality traits, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, psychoticism, household investment, volunteering, psychological commitment
MeSH terms
Attitude, Family, Humans, Personality, Religion, Social Behavior, Volunteers, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review