Cited by 91Stress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Burnout

Effort-reward imbalance and overcommitment at work,associations with police burnout

Open access
Violanti, John M., Mnatsakanova, Anna, Andrew, Michael E., Allison, Penelope, Gu, Ja Kook, Fekedulegn, Desta·2018·Police Quarterly

Abstract

The present study examined associations of effort–reward imbalance (ERI) and overcommitment at work with burnout among police officers using data from 200 (mean age = 46 years, 29% women) officers enrolled in the Buffalo Cardio-Metabolic Occupational Police Stress Study. ERI and overcommitment were assessed using Siegrist’s “effort/reward” questionnaire. The Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey was used to assess burnout and its three subscales (exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy). Analysis of covariance was used to examine mean values of burnout scores across quartiles of ERI and overcommitment. Linear regression was used to test for linear trend. ERI and overcommitment were positively and significantly associated with cynicism and exhaustion (trend p value < .001), while professional efficacy showed an inverse association with overcommitment ( p = .026). Cynicism and exhaustion scores were significantly higher in officers who reported both overcommitment and ERI compared with their counterparts ( p < .001). The results suggest that ERI and overcommitment at work are determinants of higher cynicism and exhaustion. The inverse association of overcommitment with professional efficacy (an indicator of engagement at work) suggests that extreme involvement in work may negatively affect efficacy. Overcommitment may be related to a need for approval and inability of officers to withdraw from work, even in an off-duty status. Police agencies should consider organizational remedies to maintain acceptable levels of commitment by officers. In addition, there is a need to monitor and improve effort–reward imbalance experienced by officers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1098611118774764

Cites

55 of 56 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bartone P (2000). Hardiness as a resiliency factor for United States Forces in the Gulf War In Violanti JM, Paton D, & Dunning C (Eds.), Posttraumatic stress intervention: Challenges, issues and perspectives (pp. 115– 133). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher Ltd.
  2. Burke R, & Richardsen A (2001) Psychological burnout in organizations: Research and intervention In Golembiewski RT (ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (2nd ed, pp. 327– 364). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
  3. Burke R (2017). Stress in policing: An overview In Burke RJ (Ed.), Stress in policing: Sources, consequences, and interventions (pp. 3– 28). London, Englnd: Routledge.
  4. Ellison K, & Genz J (1978). The police officer as burned out Samaritan. FBI LawEnforcement Bulletin, 47(3), 1– 7.
  5. Green D, Walkey F, & Taylor A (1991). The three factor structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 453– 472.
  6. Kirschman E, Kamena M, & Fay J (2014). Working with police families (pp. 169– 175). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  7. Leiter MP (1992). Burnout as a developmental process: Consideration of models In Shaufeli WB, Maslach C, & Marek T (Eds.), Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 236– 250). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
  8. Leiter M, & Maslach C (2004). Areas of work life: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout In Perrewe P & Ganster DC (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (pp. 91– 134). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
  9. Maslach C, Jackson S, & Leiter M (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. Third edition Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc.
  10. McCanlies EC, Miller D, Andrew ME, Wirth O, Burchfiel CM, & Violanti JM (2014). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, psychobiology, and coexisting disorders in police officers In Violanti JM (Ed.), Dying for the job: Police work exposure and health (pp. 155– 168). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  11. Paton D, Violanti J, Johnston P, Clarke J, Burjke K, & Keenan D (2013). Stress shield: A model of police resiliency In Territo L & Sewell JD (Eds.), Stress management in law enforcement (3rd ed, pp. 501– 522). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  12. Reich JW, Zautra AJ, & Hall JS (2011). Resilience science and practice: Current status and future directions In Celinski J & Gow K (Eds.), Continuity vs. Creative response to challenge (pp. 33– 50). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  13. Schaufeli W, Leiter M, Maslach C, & Jackson S (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS) In Maslach C, Jackson S, & Leiter M (Eds.), MBI manual (3rd ed). Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc.
  14. Siegrist J (2002). Effort-reward imbalance at work and health In Perrewe P & Ganster D (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being, Vol. 2: Historical and current perspectives on stress and health (pp. 261– 291). New York, NY: JAI Elsevier.
  15. Violanti J, Paton D, & Dunning C (Eds.). (2000). Posttraumatic stress intervention: Challenges, issues, and perspectives (pp. 25– 45). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Violanti, J. M., Mnatsakanova, A., Andrew, M. E., Allison, P., Gu, J. K., & Fekedulegn, D.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Violanti, John M.
Venue
Police Quarterly
Published
2018-05-21
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
440-460
ISSN
  • 1098-6111 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-745X
OpenAlex
W2804242289
Cited by
91
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Police Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1R01OH009640-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
effort-reward imbalance, overcommitment, cynicism, exhaustion, professional efficacy, occupational stress, police officers, work engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review