Cited by 123Smoking Behavior and CessationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Mindfulness training for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

Oikonomou, Maria Theodora, Arvanitis, Marios, Sokolove, Robert L·2017·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that mindfulness training has a promising potential for smoking treatment. In order to examine the efficacy of mindfulness training in smoking cessation, we performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Four randomized controlled trials with 474 patients were included in our analysis. The results showed that 25.2 percent of participants remained abstinent for more than 4 months in the mindfulness group compared to 13.6 percent of those who received usual care therapy (relative risk, 1.88; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.04-3.40). Our results suggest that mindfulness training may have an important role to play in efforts to lower cigarette smoking rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105316637667

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brewer 2011 accounts for the difference between the conclusions of Oikonomou 2017's review and this review, because Brewer 2011 indicated a strong benefit of mindfulness training with high imprecision (RR 4.97, 95% CI 1.52 to 16.22; 88 participants).

    “Brewer 2011 accounts for the difference between the conclusions of Oikonomou 2017's review and our review. Brewer 2011's results indicated a strong benefit of mindfulness training, albeit with high levels of imprecision (RR 4.97, 95% CI 1.52 to 16.22; 88 participants).”

    From Mindfulness for smoking cessation (2022) · cites this paper as Oikonomou 2017

  • Similar to Oikonomou 2017, Goldberg 2018 differs from this review's results because it included Brewer 2011, which showed a strong benefit of mindfulness on abstinence rates.

    “Similar to Oikonomou 2017, this differs from our results because it included Brewer 2011, which showed a strong benefit of mindfulness on abstinence rates.”

    From Mindfulness for smoking cessation (2022) · cites this paper as Oikonomou 2017

  • Oikonomou 2017 pooled data from three of four included studies and showed significantly greater smoking abstinence rates in smokers who received mindfulness treatment compared to control at 17- to 24-week follow-up (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.40; I2 = 44%; 419 participants).

    “Pooled data from three of their four included studies showed significantly greater smoking abstinence rates in smokers who received mindfulness treatment compared to control at 17‐ to 24‐week follow‐up (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.40; I2 = 44%; 419 participants).”

    From Mindfulness for smoking cessation (2022) · cites this paper as Oikonomou 2017

  • Some, but not all, studies and meta-analyses have found that meditation can decrease various forms of psychological and psychosocial distress such as perceived stress, anxiety, and negative affect; increase smoking cessation rates; and modestly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures.

    “Some, but not all, studies and meta-analyses have found that meditation can decrease various forms of psychological and psychosocial distress such as perceived stress, anxiety, and negative affect; increase smoking cessation rates; and modestly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures. 81,213-218”
  • Mindfulness practice reduces emotion distress, craving and withdrawal symptoms for nicotine-deprived smokers, in combination with lower relapse in smoking cessation.

    “Mindfulness practice reduces the emotion distress, craving and withdrawal symptoms for nicotine-deprived smokers,45 in combination with lower relapse in smoking cessation.46”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oikonomou, M. T., Arvanitis, M., & Sokolove, R. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Sokolove, Robert L
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2016-04-04
Volume
22
Issue
14
Pages
1841-1850
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W2341026505
Cited by
123
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
mindfulness training, smoking cessation, nicotine dependence, smoking abstinence, tobacco dependence treatment
MeSH terms
Tobacco Smoking, Humans, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Smoking Cessation, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review