Cited by 720Psychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchFree Will and AgencyPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Navigating Into the Future or Driven by the Past

Seligman, Martin E. P., Railton, Peter, Baumeister, Roy F., Sripada, Chandra·2013·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Prospection (Gilbert & Wilson, 2007), the representation of possible futures, is a ubiquitous feature of the human mind. Much psychological theory and practice, in contrast, has understood human action as determined by the past and viewed any such teleology (selection of action in light of goals) as a violation of natural law because the future cannot act on the present. Prospection involves no backward causation; rather, it is guidance not by the future itself but by present, evaluative representations of possible future states. These representations can be understood minimally as "If X, then Y" conditionals, and the process of prospection can be understood as the generation and evaluation of these conditionals. We review the history of the attempt to cast teleology out of science, culminating in the failures of behaviorism and psychoanalysis to account adequately for action without teleology. A wide range of evidence suggests that prospection is a central organizing feature of perception, cognition, affect, memory, motivation, and action. The authors speculate that prospection casts new light on why subjectivity is part of consciousness, what is "free" and "willing" in "free will," and on mental disorders and their treatment. Viewing behavior as driven by the past was a powerful framework that helped create scientific psychology, but accumulating evidence in a wide range of areas of research suggests a shift in framework, in which navigation into the future is seen as a cor…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691612474317

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One function of vmPFC is prospection, the representation of possible futures.

    “Given our caution about the multifarious functions and structures of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, it has not escaped our notice that one such function is prospection, the representation of possible futures (Seligman et al., 2013).”

    From Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. (2016) · cites this paper as Seligman et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2013-02-27
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
119-141
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2106363968
Cited by
720
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
62.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
prospection, possible futures, teleology, free will, retrocausality, behaviorism, psychoanalysis, conditionals, consciousness, subjectivity, motivation, memory, mental illness, animal behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review