Cited by 691Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEmotions and Moral BehaviorEthics, Aesthetics, and Art

In bad taste: evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust

Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., Anderson, A. K.·2009·Science

Abstract

In common parlance, moral transgressions “leave a bad taste in the mouth.” This metaphor implies a link between moral disgust and more primitive forms of disgust related to toxicity and disease, yet convincing evidence for this relationship is still lacking. We tested directly the primitive oral origins of moral disgust by searching for similarity in the facial motor activity evoked by gustatory distaste (elicited by unpleasant tastes), basic disgust (elicited by photographs of contaminants), and moral disgust (elicited by unfair treatment in an economic game). We found that all three states evoked activation of the levator labii muscle region of the face, characteristic of an oralnasal rejection response. These results suggest that immorality elicits the same disgust as disease vectors and bad tastes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1165565

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings extend previous reports of risk group differences, suggesting that overall differences in social, communication, and behavioral characteristics between high-risk and low-risk children are relatively subtle.

    “Findings of slightly elevated levels of ASD-related characteristics in HR siblings without ASD outcomes extends previous reports of risk group differences, suggesting that overall differences in social, communication, and behavioral characteristics between HR and LR children are relatively subtle.8,10,11,34”
  • Original sensory taste disgust may have been extended in human evolution to include also conceptual forms of disgust, such as in perceived physical contaminations or moral contaminations.

    “Original sensory taste disgust may have been extended in human evolution to include also conceptual forms of disgust, such as in perceived physical contaminations (e.g., by germs, mutilation or putrefaction), or moral contaminations (e.g., particular acts of violence or sex or prejudice) (Rozin et al., 2008; Chapman et al., 2009).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Chapman et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Chapman, H. A.
  • Anderson, A. K.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-02-27
Volume
323
Issue
5918
Pages
1222-1226
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1973931642
Cited by
691
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 46
FWCI
20.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Keywords
moral disgust, evolution of morality, economic fairness, facial electromyography
MeSH terms
Anger, Electromyography, Emotions, Facial Expression, Facial Muscles, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Morals, Motor Activity, Social Values, Taste, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review