Cited by 65Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Attachment style and oxytocin receptor gene variation interact in influencing social anxiety

Notzon, S., Domschke, K., Holitschke, K., Ziegler, C., Arolt, V., Pauli, P., Reif, A., Deckert, J. +1 more·2016·The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives Social anxiety has been suggested to be promoted by an insecure attachment style. Oxytocin is discussed as a mediator of trust and social bonding as well as a modulator of social anxiety. Applying a gene-environment (G × E) interaction approach, in the present pilot study the main and interactive effects of attachment styles and oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene variation were probed in a combined risk factor model of social anxiety in healthy probands. Methods Participants (N = 388; 219 females, 169 males; age 24.7 ± 4.7 years) were assessed for anxiety in social situations (Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory) depending on attachment style (Adult Attachment Scale, AAS) and OXTR rs53576 A/G genotype. Results A less secure attachment style was significantly associated with higher social anxiety. This association was partly modulated by OXTR genotype, with a stronger negative influence of a less secure attachment style on social anxiety in A allele carriers as compared to GG homozygotes. Conclusions The present pilot data point to a strong association of less secure attachment and social anxiety as well as to a gene-environment interaction effect of OXTR rs53576 genotype and attachment style on social anxiety possibly constituting a targetable combined risk marker of social anxiety disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/15622975.2015.1091502

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Notzon, S., Domschke, K., Holitschke, K., Ziegler, C., Arolt, V., Pauli, P., Reif, A., Deckert, J., & Zwanzger, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Domschke, K.
Venue
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Published
2015-10-21
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
76-83
ISSN
  • 1562-2975 (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-1412
OpenAlex
W2163675850
Cited by
65
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
social anxiety, attachment styles, insecure attachment, oxytocin receptor gene, OXTR rs53576, gene-environment interaction, social anxiety disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Female, Genotype, Germany, Humans, Male, Object Attachment, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Genetic Variation, Receptors, Oxytocin, Young Adult, Self Report, Gene-Environment Interaction, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review