Cited by 124Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Effects of single dose intranasal oxytocin on social cognition in schizophrenia

Davis, Michael C., Lee, Junghee, Horan, William P., Clarke, Angelika D., McGee, Mark R., Green, Michael F., Marder, Stephen R.·2013·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Deficits in social cognition are common in schizophrenia and predict poor community functioning. Given the current limitations of psychosocial treatments and the lack of pharmacological treatments for social cognitive deficits, the development of novel therapeutic agents could greatly enhance functional recovery in schizophrenia. This study evaluated whether a single dose of intranasal oxytocin acutely improves social cognitive functioning in schizophrenia. Twenty-three male veterans with schizophrenia completed baseline assessments of social cognition that were divided into lower-level (facial affect perception, social perception, detection of lies) and higher-level (detection of sarcasm and deception, empathy) processes. One week later, patients received the same battery after being randomized to a single dose of 40 IU intranasal oxytocin or placebo. Though the groups did not differ significantly on the social cognition composite score, oxytocin improved performance for the higher-level social cognitive tasks (Cohen's d=1.0, p=0.045). Subjects were unable to accurately guess which treatment they had received. The improvements found in higher-level social cognition encourage further studies into the therapeutic potential of oxytocin in schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.023

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, M. C., Lee, J., Horan, W. P., Clarke, A. D., McGee, M. R., Green, M. F., & Marder, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers (US)
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
147
Issue
2-3
Pages
393-397
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156784242
Cited by
124
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 8
FWCI
13.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
intranasal oxytocin, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Empathy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxytocin, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Young Adult, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review