Cited by 60Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Ordered subset linkage analysis supports a susceptibility locus for age-related macular degeneration on chromosome 16p12

Open access
Schmidt, Silke, Scott, William K, Postel, Eric A, Agarwal, Anita, Hauser, Elizabeth R, De La Paz, Monica A, Gilbert, John R, Weeks, Daniel E +3 more·2004·BMC Genetics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a complex disorder that is responsible for the majority of central vision loss in older adults living in developed countries. Phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity complicate the analysis of genome-wide scans for AMD susceptibility loci. The ordered subset analysis (OSA) method is an approach for reducing heterogeneity, increasing statistical power for detecting linkage, and helping to define the most informative data set for follow-up analysis. OSA assesses the linkage evidence in subsets of potentially more homogeneous families by rank-ordering family-specific lod scores with respect to trait-associated covariates or phenotypic features. Here, we present results of incorporating five continuous covariates into our genome-wide linkage analysis of 389 microsatellite markers in 62 multiplex families: Body mass index (BMI), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, intraocular pressure (IOP), and pack-years of cigarette smoking. Chromosome-wide significance of increases in nonparametric multipoint lod scores in covariate-defined subsets relative to the overall sample was assessed by permutation. RESULTS: Using a correction for testing multiple covariates, statistically significant lod score increases were observed for two chromosomal regions: 14q13 with a lod score of 3.2 in 28 families with average IOP </= 15.5 (p = 0.002), and 6q14 with a lod score of 1.6 in eight families with average BMI >/= 30.1 (p = 0.0004). On chromosome 16p12, nominally significant lod score increases (p </= 0.05), up to a lod score of 2.9 in 32 families, were observed with several covariate orderings. While less significant, this was the only region where linkage evidence was associated with multiple clinically meaningful covariates and the only nominally significant finding when analysis was restricted to advanced forms of AMD. Families with linkage to 16p12 had higher averages of SBP, IOP and BMI and were primarily affected with neovascular AMD. For all three regions, linkage signals at or very near the peak marker have previously been reported. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a susceptibility gene on chromosome 16p12 may predispose to AMD, particularly to the neovascular form, and that further research into the previously suggested association of neovascular AMD and systemic hypertension is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2156-5-18

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Scott WK Schmidt S Fan Y-T Postel EA Agarwal A Gass JDM Gilbert JR Haines JL Pericak-Vance MA Cigarette smoking and APOE genotype interaction in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004, 45: 2302 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, S., Scott, W. K., Postel, E. A., Agarwal, A., Hauser, E. R., De La Paz, M. A., Gilbert, J. R., Weeks, D. E., Gorin, M. B., Haines, J. L., & Pericak-Vance, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Silke
Venue
BMC Genetics
Published
2004-07-06
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
18-18
ISSN
1471-2156 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098575615
Cited by
60
References
85
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-11268, P60AG011268)
  • National Eye Institute (EY 09859, R01EY009859, R01EY012118, U10EY012118, EY12118)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, neovascular AMD, genetic susceptibility loci, intraocular pressure, body mass index, blood pressure, smoking, systemic hypertension, genetic heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Blood Pressure, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16, Female, Genotype, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Genetic Linkage, Lod Score, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Smoking, Body Mass Index, Microsatellite Repeats, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review