Cited by 299Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyRetinal Development and Disorders

The Genetics of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Review of Progress to Date

Haddad, Stephen, Chen, Clara A., Santangelo, Susan L., Seddon, Johanna M.·2006·Survey of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of vision loss and blindness among older adults in the USA and throughout the developed world. Etiological research suggests that AMD is a complex disease, caused by the actions and interactions of multiple genes and environmental factors. Familial aggregation studies, twin studies, and segregation analyses have provided strong evidence for the heritability of AMD, and linkage and association studies have been conducted to localize the disease-causing genes. Whole genome linkage scans have implicated nearly every chromosome in the human genome, with the most replicated signals residing on 1q25-31 and 10q26. Association studies have identified a major risk variant within the complement factor H gene (CFH), and recent reports suggest that PLEKHA1/LOC387715 and the BF/C2 regions may be major risk loci for AMD as well. Several other genes have had at least one positive association finding and deserve further exploration. Among these, apolipoprotein E (APOE) may be a minor risk locus. Additional genes will likely be identified, and future studies should explore the potential interactions of these genes with other genes as well as environmental factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.05.001

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 155 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haddad, S., Chen, C. A., Santangelo, S. L., & Seddon, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Seddon, Johanna M.
Venue
Survey of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
316-363
ISSN
0039-6257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082887801
Cited by
299
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Survey of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY011309)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, genetic susceptibility, heritability, genetic linkage, genetic association, complement factor H, apolipoprotein E, gene-environment interaction, vision loss
MeSH terms
Humans, Macular Degeneration, Risk Factors, Disease Progression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review