The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS?
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Suboptimal treatment adherence remains a barrier to the control of many infectious diseases, including tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, which contribute significantly to the global disease burden. However, few of the many interventions developed to address this issue explicitly draw on theories of health behaviour. Such theories could contribute to the design of more effective interventions to promote treatment adherence and to improving assessments of the transferability of these interventions across different health issues and settings. METHODS: This paper reviews behaviour change theories applicable to long-term treatment adherence; assesses the evidence for their effectiveness in predicting behaviour change; and examines the implications of these findings for developing strategies to improve TB and HIV/AIDS medication adherence. We searched a number of electronic databases for theories of behaviour change. Eleven theories were examined. RESULTS: Little empirical evidence was located on the effectiveness of these theories in promoting adherence. However, several models have the potential to both improve understanding of adherence behaviours and contribute to the design of more effective interventions to promote adherence to TB and HIV/AIDS medication. CONCLUSION: Further research and analysis is needed urgently to determine which models might best improve adherence to long-term treatment regimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.51.3.390 · Cited by 9,098
In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.9.1102 · Cited by 8,596
The Health Belief Model: a decade later.
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 · Cited by 8,437
Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model
Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818801500203 · Cited by 5,564 · cited 1×
“Recently, self-efficacy was added into the theory [30], thereby incorporating the need to feel competent before effecting long-term change [31].”
BackgroundMaking psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach
Michie, S. (2005) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.011155 · Cited by 3,440
The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of its Applications to Health-Related Behaviors
Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87 · Cited by 3,185
Health promotion from the perspective of Social Cognitive Theory
Bandura, A. (1998) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870449808407422 · Cited by 3,087
Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change
Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9 · Cited by 2,342
Cited by
Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions?
Shepperd, S., Lewin, S., Straus, S., Clarke, M., Eccles, M. P., Fitzpatrick, R., Wong, G., & Sheikh, A. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000086 · Cited by 408
Self-citationComputer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Pal, K., Eastwood, S. V., Michie, S., Farmer, A. J., Barnard, M. L., Peacock, R., Wood, B., Inniss, J. D., & Murray, E. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008776.pub2 · Cited by 344
Adapting western research methods to indigenous ways of knowing
Simonds, V. W., & Christopher, S. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.301157 · Cited by 311
Tola, H. H., Shojaeizadeh, D., Tol, A., Garmaroudi, G., Yekaninejad, M. S., Kebede, A., Ejeta, L. T., Kassa, D., & Klinkenberg, E. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155147 · Cited by 215
“Although evidence suggests that public health and health promotion interventions that are based on behavioral science theories are more effective than those without theoretical model [26,27], available interventional studies related to TB treatment adherence lack theoretical model as guides.”
Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?
Booth, A., & Carroll, C. (2015) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/hir.12108 · Cited by 196
Holmes, E. A. F., Hughes, D. A., & Morrison, V. L. (2014) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2671 · Cited by 199
Liao, Q., Cowling, B., Lam, W. T., Ng, M. W., & Fielding, R. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013350 · Cited by 163
Atinga, R. A., Yarney, L., & Gavu, N. M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193995 · Cited by 113
Moore, G., Wilding, H., Gray, K., & Castle, D. (2019) · Journal of Participatory Medicine · doi:10.2196/11474 · Cited by 95
Molloy, G. J., Graham, H., & McGuinness, H. (2012) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-838 · Cited by 56
Past, Present, and Future Drug Delivery Systems for Antiretrovirals
Kirtane, A. R., Langer, R., & Traverso, G. (2016) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2016.09.015 · Cited by 28
Kobue, B., Moch, S., & Watermeyer, J. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2246-8 · Cited by 22
Woolf-King, S. E., Sheinfil, A. Z., Ramos, J., Foley, J. D., Moskal, D., Firkey, M., Kellen, D., & Maisto, S. A. (2022) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1806722 · Cited by 23
Harrison, A., Scott, W., Timmins, L., Graham, C. D., & Harrison, A. M. (2021) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2020.1771263 · Cited by 12
(2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Munro, S., Lewin, S., Swart, T., & Volmink, J.
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2007-06-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 104-104
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119700561
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 23.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
